Chris_in_Tampa wrote:Saved radar.
http://img803.imageshack.us/img803/7964 ... p200km.gif
From the hard to load Cuba site.
That's a big difference from a couple of hours ago, really wrapping back up now.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Chris_in_Tampa wrote:Saved radar.
http://img803.imageshack.us/img803/7964 ... p200km.gif
From the hard to load Cuba site.
Aric Dunn wrote:panhandle is at very high risk ... more than areas west. two runs of models are not a consensus . gfs went 4 days from the big bend to destin ... at 2 runs of west is nothing to make certain yet.. the system still needs to organize more. next couple runs will help.... we did get past a big hurtle today with islands so it will be a little more straight forward tomorrow
Blinhart wrote:Aric is politely agree to disagree with you, I'm starting to think that the GFS is more in line with what will actually happen, I know you are a Pro Met, but many different news agencies around are buying into the latest run of the GFS, so there must be some credence to it. I'm not trying to start an argument just stating that is pretty bold to say that the GFS is pretty off here. If I misunderstood, I'm sorry.
Jag95 wrote:NativeFloridaGirl wrote:So the Florida panhandle is in the clear now?
Hardly...don't forget the Euro. Personally, I wouldn't think you're all clear until it's west of you.
Aric Dunn wrote:panhandle is at very high risk ... more than areas west. two runs of models are not a consensus . gfs went 4 days from the big bend to destin ... at 2 runs of west is nothing to make certain yet.. the system still needs to organize more. next couple runs will help.... we did get past a big hurtle today with islands so it will be a little more straight forward tomorrow
SouthernBreeze wrote:he's moved quite a bit north from the previous Cuban radar on this page!
ozonepete wrote:SouthernBreeze wrote:he's moved quite a bit north from the previous Cuban radar on this page!
Not just on the radar, but satellite as well, it has moved a LOT northwest. This could have serious implications for track.
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
ozonepete wrote:SouthernBreeze wrote:he's moved quite a bit north from the previous Cuban radar on this page!
Not just on the radar, but satellite as well, it has moved a LOT northwest. This could have serious implications for track.
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
ozonepete wrote:SouthernBreeze wrote:he's moved quite a bit north from the previous Cuban radar on this page!
Not just on the radar, but satellite as well, it has moved a LOT northwest. This could have serious implications for track.
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests