ATL: DEBBY - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7183
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#561 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:48 am

Air Force Met wrote:
AHS2011 wrote:Once Debby forms, I would like to see how wide the cone of uncertainty is.


The cone of uncertainty is always the same width...the NHC does not modify it for any given storm or forecast. All the cone is is an error probability circle...meaning 2/3 of the time the track at a given time will be in that circle.

IN other words, 2/3 the error circle for the 72 hr forecast track is 144 miles. That means 2/3 of the time the NHC track will hit in that circle in 72 hrs...but it also means 1/3 of the time they are wrong. You connect ALL the valid times and their circles together...and you get the cone.

There is nothing magical or manipulated about the cone. It's pure statistical error and each cone width is the same...regardless of storm or how well behaved.


In addition, there are some private weather services that also have cones, tracks, triangles, rectangles, etc. and as we have seen in the past, those shapes and sizes change on a regular basis.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#562 Postby tailgater » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:49 am

:uarrow: That's not what I'm saying, But I don't think the center has relocated, it could easily later but I don't see anything yet.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#563 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:50 am

tolakram wrote:GFS has the first well defined center at the 21 hour mark.

[img]http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/7460/zz96gfs.png[/mg]

The euro doesn't have anything well defined until 72 hours, though this may be a resolution issue.

[img]http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/2559/zz96euro.png[/ig]



if you look at this then you can see around 48 hours a lobe is pulled north likely the convection on the east side ne if the yucatan than somewhere between then a 72 its wraps up. but It wont take that long thats why im not buying the euro atm.

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/ECMW ... floop.html
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
trave2
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:15 am
Location: Tampa FL.

Re:

#564 Postby trave2 » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:54 am

Aric Dunn wrote:So all in all until convection build over a larger area within the large gyro nothing will ever consolidate. SO the gfs pulling some pieces of energy off as the trough approaches is not out of the question since its so broad.


Well said!
0 likes   

User avatar
vaffie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:11 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#565 Postby vaffie » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:55 am

The center is reforming over the deepest convection in the Yucatan channel. The lowest pressures seem to be now just east of the Yucatan peninsula, and dropping quickly. I've seen two ship reports now down to 1005.7 mb in that area. There are also a couple of sustained wind reports finding 29-30 knots in that area. Yesterday the highest we saw was 20 knots. At this rate, it should be a tropical storm by afternoon.

edit by tolakram: added disclaimer

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#566 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:55 am

They should probably just hold off on recon till tomorrow. unless they just want to incorporate the location of all the vorts spinning around this thing for the models.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
trave2
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:15 am
Location: Tampa FL.

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#567 Postby trave2 » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:57 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
tolakram wrote:GFS has the first well defined center at the 21 hour mark.

[img]http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/7460/zz96gfs.png[/mg]

The euro doesn't have anything well defined until 72 hours, though this may be a resolution issue.

[img]http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/2559/zz96euro.png[/ig]



if you look at this then you can see around 48 hours a lobe is pulled north likely the convection on the east side ne if the yucatan than somewhere between then a 72 its wraps up. but It wont take that long thats why im not buying the euro atm.

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/ECMW ... floop.html


Yes...also the gfs seems way more "fluid" than other models when it comes to disorganized messes like this
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#568 Postby tolakram » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:57 am

vaffie, what is the source of your data?
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
vaffie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:11 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#569 Postby vaffie » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:59 am

tolakram wrote:vaffie, what is the source of your data?


National Data Buoy Center website's observation search:

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/radial_search. ... t=A&time=3
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#570 Postby tolakram » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:01 am

vaffie wrote:
tolakram wrote:vaffie, what is the source of your data?


National Data Buoy Center website's observation search:

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/radial_search. ... t=A&time=3


Excellent, thanks.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Rgv20
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2466
Age: 38
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Edinburg/McAllen Tx

#571 Postby Rgv20 » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:01 am

HPC's overnight discussion.

MODEL UNCERTAINTY REMAINS VERY HIGH WITH LOW
PRESSURE NEAR THE YUCATAN PENINSULA...WITH THE UKMET FARTHEST WEST
THROUGH THE ENTIRE PERIOD...FOLLOWED BY THE ECMWF...CANADIAN...AND
FINALLY THE GFS WHICH IS ON THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE GUIDANCE.
ORIENTATION OF THE UPPER HIGH OVER THE PLAINS SUPPORTS WEST OR
EVEN SOUTHWESTWARD MOVEMENT EVENTUALLY BUT WHEN THAT BEGINS IS
CRUCIAL TO ITS PATH.
FOR NOW...WILL REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH
YESTERDAY'S FORECAST POINTS BASED ON THE DAILY COORDINATION CALL
WITH THE NHC WHICH RESULTED IN A LOW REMAINING NEAR THE CENTER OF
THE GULF THROUGH DAY 7. ELSEWHERE...THE PRELIMINARY
PRESSURES/FRONTS WERE STARTED WITH THE 00Z ECMWF BEFORE
TRANSITIONING TOWARD INCREASING PERCENTAGES OF THE ECMWF ENSEMBLE
MEAN TO ACCOUNT FOR THE GROWING UNCERTAINTY WITH TIME.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#572 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:02 am

Rgv20 wrote:HPC's overnight discussion.

MODEL UNCERTAINTY REMAINS VERY HIGH WITH LOW
PRESSURE NEAR THE YUCATAN PENINSULA...WITH THE UKMET FARTHEST WEST
THROUGH THE ENTIRE PERIOD...FOLLOWED BY THE ECMWF...CANADIAN...AND
FINALLY THE GFS WHICH IS ON THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE GUIDANCE.
ORIENTATION OF THE UPPER HIGH OVER THE PLAINS SUPPORTS WEST OR
EVEN SOUTHWESTWARD MOVEMENT EVENTUALLY BUT WHEN THAT BEGINS IS
CRUCIAL TO ITS PATH.
FOR NOW...WILL REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH
YESTERDAY'S FORECAST POINTS BASED ON THE DAILY COORDINATION CALL
WITH THE NHC WHICH RESULTED IN A LOW REMAINING NEAR THE CENTER OF
THE GULF THROUGH DAY 7. ELSEWHERE...THE PRELIMINARY
PRESSURES/FRONTS WERE STARTED WITH THE 00Z ECMWF BEFORE
TRANSITIONING TOWARD INCREASING PERCENTAGES OF THE ECMWF ENSEMBLE
MEAN TO ACCOUNT FOR THE GROWING UNCERTAINTY WITH TIME.


The center of the gulf through day 7 ... lol
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#573 Postby Sanibel » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:03 am

Appears to be a spiral center near 23N-86.5W (Close to GFS spot)
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#574 Postby Air Force Met » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:05 am

vaffie wrote:The center is reforming over the deepest convection in the Yucatan channel. The lowest pressures seem to be now just east of the Yucatan peninsula, and dropping quickly. I've seen two ship reports now down to 1005.7 mb in that area. There are also a couple of sustained wind reports finding 29-30 knots in that area. Yesterday the highest we saw was 20 knots. At this rate, it should be a tropical storm by afternoon.

[/b]


I think the potential is there for the center to get reformed...but it isn't yet.

First, the convection is going to have to last...and we are coming into a diurnal min.

Second, the real clue will be watch the CU field to the east. The cu lines are still screaming into the convection. This leads me to believe there is NO low pressure there right now. IF there where, the winds would be backing more towards the south. The atmosphere doesn't make right turns. So the primary reason for the convective explosion is convergence of the inflow and the low.

Lastly...in order for the surface low to tuck under the convection, you usually need mid level vorticity to get going. I think that has occurred...but as I said above...the convection has to last.

Give it time. Watch the cu streets to the east ad south. These are your indicators on whether or not there is a low.
0 likes   

adam0983

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#575 Postby adam0983 » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:08 am

Does anyone know the time frame on when or if invest 96L will hit land?
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#576 Postby tolakram » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:10 am

adam0983 wrote:Does anyone know the time frame on when or if invest 96L will hit land?


Not really at this time. GFS has a Florida hit in 3 days, Euro hits Texas in 5 or 6 days. At this moment in time there is no really good consensus.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#577 Postby mattpetre » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:12 am

Center of the gulf for 7 days could really help zap the heat content for a while. Maybe this thing could just spin itself into oblivion without ever reaching land... just rains for the places that need them... now that is -removed-.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#578 Postby tolakram » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:16 am

Loop: http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... umframes=5

I'm watching the areas indicated on the image below. I think convection building and any signs of banding will be the first indicator of organization.

Image


Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#579 Postby tailgater » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:20 am

I think this RAP model seems plausible. A relocation sort of.
http://weather.rap.ucar.edu/model/displ ... all&hours=
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Dave
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 13442
Age: 74
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: Milan Indiana
Contact:

#580 Postby Dave » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:21 am

000
NOUS42 KNHC 221415
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
1015 AM EDT FRI JUN 22 2012
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
VALID 23/1100Z TO 24/1100Z JUN 2012
TCPOD NUMBER.....12-035

I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA (GULF OF MEXICO)
FLIGHT ONE -- TEAL 70 --
A. 23/1800Z
B. AFXXX 01AAA INVEST
C. 23/1615Z
D. 25.5N 888.5W
E. 23/1715Z TO 23/2130Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT

FLIGHT TWO -- TEAL 71 --
A. 24/1200,1800Z
B. AFXXX 0204A CYCLONE
C. 24/1015Z
D. 27.1N 88.5W
E. 24/1100Z TO 24/1800Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT

2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY: CONTINUE 6-HRLY FIXES.
3. REMARK: LOW LEVEL INVEST FOR 22/1800Z CANCELED
BY NHC AT 22/1230Z.


II. PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK.....NEGATIVE.
JWP
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2012”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests