CPAC: ISELLE - Post-Tropical
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- Yellow Evan
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 15960
- Age: 25
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
- Contact:
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
Re: CPAC: ISELLE - Hurricane
Iselle's long lasting journey as a hurricane finally comes to an end...
Even 60kt is likely somewhat generous now
Even 60kt is likely somewhat generous now
0 likes
- Yellow Evan
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 15960
- Age: 25
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
- Contact:
Re: CPAC: ISELLE - Hurricane
supercane4867 wrote:Iselle's long lasting journey as a hurricane finally comes to an end...
Even 60kt is likely somewhat generous now
I'd give it 60 knts if I was doing the ATCF.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4963
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
- Contact:
- Yellow Evan
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 15960
- Age: 25
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
- Contact:
Re: CPAC: ISELLE - Hurricane
Alyono wrote:
I have to strongly disagree with lowering of the winds. I am not seeing this any more ragged than when the aircraft measured the 65 to 70 kt winds. Not saying this is the most organized hurricane, but it appears to me, based upon sat and radar, to have maintained intensity.
Would it have been better to wait for recon at 6Z to lower the winds?
You're welcome to disagree, of course. But there were several of us (with many years of operational tropical cyclone experience in the Pacific) with eyes on this thing for the 03Z advisory and we all agreed 70 knots was no longer appropriate for this system given that the low level center was increasingly separating from the deep convection (due to rapidly increasing northerly shear), as well as a ragged and very asymmetric, non-banded appearance that was worsening on satellite. It looked very similar to the evolution of Jimena in 2003 when it made it's CPA to the Big Island. The latest VORTEX drop of 996 mb confirms my thinking.
Last edited by Iceman56 on Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
Re:
Chris_in_Tampa wrote:Given it is moving closer to west, the north quadrant may be more likely to have the higher winds, as opposed to the NE quadrant how they flew. So, it could be a little higher there especially.
Radar did found a small area of 60-65kt winds at 5000 feet just offshore the island, don't know how well these winds mixing down to the surface
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/a6Nf68n.png)
0 likes
- Yellow Evan
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 15960
- Age: 25
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
- Contact:
Re: CPAC: ISELLE - Hurricane
Iceman56 wrote:Alyono wrote:
I have to strongly disagree with lowering of the winds. I am not seeing this any more ragged than when the aircraft measured the 65 to 70 kt winds. Not saying this is the most organized hurricane, but it appears to me, based upon sat and radar, to have maintained intensity.
Would it have been better to wait for recon at 6Z to lower the winds?
You're welcome to disagree, of course. But there were several of us (with many years of operational tropical cyclone experience in the Pacific) with eyes on this thing for the 03Z advisory and we all agreed 70 knots was no longer appropriate for this system given that the low level center was increasingly separating from the deep convection (due to rapidly increasing northerly shear), as well as a ragged and very asymmetric, non-banded appearance that was worsening on satellite. It looked very similar to the evolution of Jimena in 2003 when it made it's CPA to the Big Island. The latest VORTEX drop of 996 mb confirms my thinking.
Lowering it IMO was risky. Granted, as I said, it's probs 55-60 knots right now, so it did not backfire.
0 likes
Re: CPAC: ISELLE - Hurricane
Yellow Evan wrote:
Lowering it IMO was risky. Granted, as I said, it's probs 55-60 knots right now, so it did not backfire.
It wasn't risky at all, it was a solid consensus (unanimous, in fact) decision based on experience and extensive training. This is what we do.
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4963
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
- Contact:
Re: CPAC: ISELLE - Hurricane
Iceman56 wrote:Alyono wrote:
I have to strongly disagree with lowering of the winds. I am not seeing this any more ragged than when the aircraft measured the 65 to 70 kt winds. Not saying this is the most organized hurricane, but it appears to me, based upon sat and radar, to have maintained intensity.
Would it have been better to wait for recon at 6Z to lower the winds?
You're welcome to disagree, of course. But there were several of us (with many years of operational tropical cyclone experience in the Pacific) with eyes on this thing for the 03Z advisory and we all agreed 70 knots was no longer appropriate for this system given that the low level center was increasingly separating from the deep convection (due to rapidly increasing northerly shear), as well as a ragged and very asymmetric, non-banded appearance that was worsening on satellite. It looked very similar to the evolution of Jimena in 2003 when it made it's CPA to the Big Island. The latest VORTEX drop of 996 mb confirms my thinking.
No doubt, it has weakened and this probably is no longer a hurricane. The NW shear got to the core just prior to landfall
However, given the fact that the core became more convective at after the 0Z 70 kts were found, I wouldn't have lowered the winds because the wind from aloft was likely being transported to the surface (we just saw that with Bertha last week and I've seen that many times as well in my many years of experience, albeit mainly in the Atlantic)
Now... in these sheared environments, what I have also seen is that after a burst, the storm quickly weakens. Ida was a classic example
0 likes
- Yellow Evan
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 15960
- Age: 25
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
- Contact:
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
- Yellow Evan
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 15960
- Age: 25
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
- Contact:
Looks to it now clipping the land and appears to be 50-55 knots.
High end TS ATM.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
High end TS ATM.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4963
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
- Contact:
URPN12 KNHC 080712
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE EP092014
A. 08/06:58:00Z
B. 18 deg 57 min N
154 deg 34 min W
C. 700 mb 3085 m
D. 52 kt
E. 356 deg 38 nm
F. 107 deg 48 kt
G. 356 deg 38 nm
H. 999 mb
I. 8 C / 3046 m
J. 16 C / 3049 m
K. NA / NA
L. NA
M. NA
N. 1345 / 7
O. 0.02 / 3 nm
P. AF302 0709C ISELLE OB 08
MAX FL WIND 48 KT 357 / 51 NM 06:43:00Z
Sonde surface wind 135 / 16 kts
Curved band of moderate echoes 45nm NE of center
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE EP092014
A. 08/06:58:00Z
B. 18 deg 57 min N
154 deg 34 min W
C. 700 mb 3085 m
D. 52 kt
E. 356 deg 38 nm
F. 107 deg 48 kt
G. 356 deg 38 nm
H. 999 mb
I. 8 C / 3046 m
J. 16 C / 3049 m
K. NA / NA
L. NA
M. NA
N. 1345 / 7
O. 0.02 / 3 nm
P. AF302 0709C ISELLE OB 08
MAX FL WIND 48 KT 357 / 51 NM 06:43:00Z
Sonde surface wind 135 / 16 kts
Curved band of moderate echoes 45nm NE of center
0 likes
- Kingarabian
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 15462
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
- Kingarabian
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 15462
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests