CPAC: ISELLE - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15960
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

#1141 Postby Yellow Evan » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:01 am

They probs kept it as a hurricane for public alarm reasons.
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: CPAC: ISELLE - Hurricane

#1142 Postby supercane4867 » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:03 am

Iselle's long lasting journey as a hurricane finally comes to an end...

Even 60kt is likely somewhat generous now
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15960
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: CPAC: ISELLE - Hurricane

#1143 Postby Yellow Evan » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:16 am

supercane4867 wrote:Iselle's long lasting journey as a hurricane finally comes to an end...

Even 60kt is likely somewhat generous now


I'd give it 60 knts if I was doing the ATCF.
0 likes   

Chris_in_Tampa
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4963
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Contact:

#1144 Postby Chris_in_Tampa » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:25 am

Given it is moving closer to west, the north quadrant may be more likely to have the higher winds, as opposed to the NE quadrant how they flew. So, it could be a little higher there especially.
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15960
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

#1145 Postby Yellow Evan » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:29 am

The Hawaii News seems to think it has passed south of Hilo. Radar begs to differ.
0 likes   

Iceman56

Re: CPAC: ISELLE - Hurricane

#1146 Postby Iceman56 » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:29 am

Alyono wrote:
I have to strongly disagree with lowering of the winds. I am not seeing this any more ragged than when the aircraft measured the 65 to 70 kt winds. Not saying this is the most organized hurricane, but it appears to me, based upon sat and radar, to have maintained intensity.

Would it have been better to wait for recon at 6Z to lower the winds?


You're welcome to disagree, of course. But there were several of us (with many years of operational tropical cyclone experience in the Pacific) with eyes on this thing for the 03Z advisory and we all agreed 70 knots was no longer appropriate for this system given that the low level center was increasingly separating from the deep convection (due to rapidly increasing northerly shear), as well as a ragged and very asymmetric, non-banded appearance that was worsening on satellite. It looked very similar to the evolution of Jimena in 2003 when it made it's CPA to the Big Island. The latest VORTEX drop of 996 mb confirms my thinking.
Last edited by Iceman56 on Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re:

#1147 Postby supercane4867 » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:30 am

Chris_in_Tampa wrote:Given it is moving closer to west, the north quadrant may be more likely to have the higher winds, as opposed to the NE quadrant how they flew. So, it could be a little higher there especially.

Radar did found a small area of 60-65kt winds at 5000 feet just offshore the island, don't know how well these winds mixing down to the surface

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15960
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: CPAC: ISELLE - Hurricane

#1148 Postby Yellow Evan » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:31 am

Iceman56 wrote:
Alyono wrote:
I have to strongly disagree with lowering of the winds. I am not seeing this any more ragged than when the aircraft measured the 65 to 70 kt winds. Not saying this is the most organized hurricane, but it appears to me, based upon sat and radar, to have maintained intensity.

Would it have been better to wait for recon at 6Z to lower the winds?


You're welcome to disagree, of course. But there were several of us (with many years of operational tropical cyclone experience in the Pacific) with eyes on this thing for the 03Z advisory and we all agreed 70 knots was no longer appropriate for this system given that the low level center was increasingly separating from the deep convection (due to rapidly increasing northerly shear), as well as a ragged and very asymmetric, non-banded appearance that was worsening on satellite. It looked very similar to the evolution of Jimena in 2003 when it made it's CPA to the Big Island. The latest VORTEX drop of 996 mb confirms my thinking.


Lowering it IMO was risky. Granted, as I said, it's probs 55-60 knots right now, so it did not backfire.
0 likes   

Iceman56

Re: CPAC: ISELLE - Hurricane

#1149 Postby Iceman56 » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:36 am

Yellow Evan wrote:
Lowering it IMO was risky. Granted, as I said, it's probs 55-60 knots right now, so it did not backfire.


It wasn't risky at all, it was a solid consensus (unanimous, in fact) decision based on experience and extensive training. This is what we do. 8-)
0 likes   

Chris_in_Tampa
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4963
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Contact:

#1150 Postby Chris_in_Tampa » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:37 am

Making an important N to S pass.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: CPAC: ISELLE - Hurricane

#1151 Postby Alyono » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:47 am

Iceman56 wrote:
Alyono wrote:
I have to strongly disagree with lowering of the winds. I am not seeing this any more ragged than when the aircraft measured the 65 to 70 kt winds. Not saying this is the most organized hurricane, but it appears to me, based upon sat and radar, to have maintained intensity.

Would it have been better to wait for recon at 6Z to lower the winds?


You're welcome to disagree, of course. But there were several of us (with many years of operational tropical cyclone experience in the Pacific) with eyes on this thing for the 03Z advisory and we all agreed 70 knots was no longer appropriate for this system given that the low level center was increasingly separating from the deep convection (due to rapidly increasing northerly shear), as well as a ragged and very asymmetric, non-banded appearance that was worsening on satellite. It looked very similar to the evolution of Jimena in 2003 when it made it's CPA to the Big Island. The latest VORTEX drop of 996 mb confirms my thinking.


No doubt, it has weakened and this probably is no longer a hurricane. The NW shear got to the core just prior to landfall

However, given the fact that the core became more convective at after the 0Z 70 kts were found, I wouldn't have lowered the winds because the wind from aloft was likely being transported to the surface (we just saw that with Bertha last week and I've seen that many times as well in my many years of experience, albeit mainly in the Atlantic)

Now... in these sheared environments, what I have also seen is that after a burst, the storm quickly weakens. Ida was a classic example
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15960
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

#1152 Postby Yellow Evan » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:51 am

LLC looks 1-2 hours away from hitting the coast. Landfall should be around 0930z based on recent radar trends.
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: CPAC: ISELLE - Hurricane

#1153 Postby supercane4867 » Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:05 am

Saved radar

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15960
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

#1154 Postby Yellow Evan » Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:07 am

Based on recon, this is no more than a mid-grade TS.
0 likes   

Equilibrium

#1155 Postby Equilibrium » Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:12 am

Looks to it now clipping the land and appears to be 50-55 knots.
High end TS ATM.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
0 likes   

Chris_in_Tampa
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4963
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Contact:

#1156 Postby Chris_in_Tampa » Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:18 am

URPN12 KNHC 080712
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE EP092014
A. 08/06:58:00Z
B. 18 deg 57 min N
154 deg 34 min W
C. 700 mb 3085 m
D. 52 kt
E. 356 deg 38 nm
F. 107 deg 48 kt
G. 356 deg 38 nm
H. 999 mb
I. 8 C / 3046 m
J. 16 C / 3049 m
K. NA / NA
L. NA
M. NA
N. 1345 / 7
O. 0.02 / 3 nm
P. AF302 0709C ISELLE OB 08
MAX FL WIND 48 KT 357 / 51 NM 06:43:00Z
Sonde surface wind 135 / 16 kts
Curved band of moderate echoes 45nm NE of center
0 likes   

Equilibrium

#1157 Postby Equilibrium » Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:19 am

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15462
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

#1158 Postby Kingarabian » Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:39 am

Still waiting on landfall.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: CPAC: ISELLE - Hurricane

#1159 Postby supercane4867 » Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:40 am

EP, 09, 2014080806, , BEST, 0, 189N, 1544W, 60, 995, TS
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15462
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

#1160 Postby Kingarabian » Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:48 am

Hawaiians/locals here can't tell the difference between 70mph and 75mph anyways.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant


Return to “2014”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests