ATL: ARTHUR - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20011
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: ARTHUR - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1781 Postby tolakram » Thu Jul 03, 2014 12:40 am

For intensification, the primary concern is the front approaching from the west. With the SW to NE flow it's in a perfect spot to act as strong ventilation for the outflow and could, I say could, lead to more rapid intensification that if it wasn't there.

How rapid is the big question, if rapid at all.

Zoom 2 live IR view. You can see the front approaching and Arthur growing in size.

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/get-goes?satellite=GOES-E%20CONUS&lat=31&lon=-79&info=ir&zoom=2&width=1000&height=800&quality=95&type=Animation&palette=ir1.pal&numframes=10

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Time_Zone
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 4:15 am

Re: ATL: ARTHUR - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1782 Postby Time_Zone » Thu Jul 03, 2014 12:41 am

Thanks :). I didn't expect this storm to likely skip hop and jump from 70 to 80+ mph within hours. I expected it to hold steady for a good day or so. That only makes me wonder if it could exceed the current predicted landfall intensity. We'll see what the next update says from the NHC.. like many times before, even though something blatantly is stronger, the NHC doesn't like to acknowledge that right away.[/quote]

It hasn't. One poster speculated he thinks he may have. Personally. I'm thinking maybe 75 MPH. I see no way it goes above 80 by the time recon is there. Knowing Arthur he could very well still be the same intensity.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 42
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#1783 Postby Hammy » Thu Jul 03, 2014 12:50 am

Looking at how much the radar is degrading in the last hour now I'm thinking maybe 65mph. The eyewall has splintered and it looks at least in the short term that it's feeling the effects of some westerly shear.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#1784 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Jul 03, 2014 12:53 am

although limited.. there has clearly been some increase in moisture into the system.. recon very likely to find a 75 to 80 mph ...
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Time_Zone
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 4:15 am

#1785 Postby Time_Zone » Thu Jul 03, 2014 12:55 am

Looking at the latest water vapor loop dry air appears to be suddenly abating...Why? Or am am I seeing things?
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5472
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: ARTHUR - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1786 Postby chaser1 » Thu Jul 03, 2014 12:57 am

'Ol Arthur tryin' to make a name for himself, huh? Looks like yesterday near its maximum point of organization, with the difference being that the LLC isnt running ahead of it mid level center, but catching up to it. The main envelope appears to have possibly temporarily stalled (deepening?), and if the LLC does become embedded and an outflow channel does develop, then his training wheels might come off in a pretty big way.

One other thought; if Arthur has slowed temporarily in response to deepening, that may prove a blessing to the N.C. Outer Cape. Any delayed northward motion could prove to be just the extra few hours needed for the mid level flow to begin pushing Arthur Northeastward and possibly skirting south and east of actual landfall. Obviously the farther north Arthur gets prior to a N.E. motion, the harder it'll be to recurve prior to landfall.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20011
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: ARTHUR - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1787 Postby tolakram » Thu Jul 03, 2014 12:57 am

0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#1788 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Jul 03, 2014 12:59 am

Time_Zone wrote:Looking at the latest water vapor loop dry air appears to be suddenly abating...Why? Or am am I seeing things?


though it s possible to decern mid level from upper level in a normal WV loop.. most of what you see is not having any part in it..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#1789 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:04 am

ok..... recon...
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#1790 Postby ConvergenceZone » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:04 am

Interesting tidbit in the latest discussion just posted:

" the center of the guidance envelope has again shifted a little westward
toward the North Carolina coast.The GFS has made a rather
significant shift since the previous run, and it now brings the
center of Arthur across eastern North Carolina. The new forecast
track is shifted a little closer to the coast, but it will stay in
the center of the guidance envelope to the east of the GFS."
0 likes   

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

#1791 Postby HurriGuy » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:06 am

what the heck??? faulty equipment right when passing through???
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Jevo
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1729
Age: 47
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:45 pm
Location: The Flemish Cap
Contact:

Re: ATL: ARTHUR - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1792 Postby Jevo » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:07 am

0z Euro is West of previous run as well.. Unfortunately we only get 24 hour plots from the free sites, but this run is showing 978mb approaching E-NC and the OBX

http://i.imgur.com/GNMgOHP.gif
Last edited by Jevo on Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Disclaimer: 50% of the time I have no clue of what I am talking about. Chances are I am taking a less than educated guess that sounds good because 10 years ago I stole Mike Watkins book 'The Hurricane and its Impact'. For official information please direct yourself to the NHC and their cadre of weather geniuses.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#1793 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:08 am

HurriGuy wrote:what the heck??? faulty equipment right when passing through???


not sure but they were flying at 9 to 10 k feet not AF level at all..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: ARTHUR - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1794 Postby ConvergenceZone » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:09 am

Jevo wrote:0z Euro is West of previous run as well.. Unfortunately we only get 24 hour plots from the free sites, but the last run is showing 978mb approaching E-NC and the OBX

http://i.imgur.com/GNMgOHP.gif



Yea, I wouldn't be shocked if when all is said and done that the center moves right along the coast before it moves further out to sea.....I wouldn't be surprised at all...
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#1795 Postby Alyono » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:10 am

EC is around 967 as it makes its closest approach to the Outer Banks

dont have the scaled winds yet, but it looks to be around 95-100 KT using the raw winds
0 likes   

Time_Zone
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 4:15 am

Re:

#1796 Postby Time_Zone » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:12 am

Alyono wrote:EC is around 967 as it makes its closest approach to the Outer Banks

dont have the scaled winds yet, but it looks to be around 95-100 KT using the raw winds


I highly doubt it gets anywhere near 100 KTS
0 likes   

ncweatherwizard
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1243
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:45 am
Location: Ft. Collins, CO

Re: ATL: ARTHUR - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1797 Postby ncweatherwizard » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:13 am

tolakram wrote:For intensification, the primary concern is the front approaching from the west. With the SW to NE flow it's in a perfect spot to act as strong ventilation for the outflow and could, I say could, lead to more rapid intensification that if it wasn't there.

How rapid is the big question, if rapid at all.

Zoom 2 live IR view. You can see the front approaching and Arthur growing in size.

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/get-goes?satellite=GOES-E%20CONUS&lat=31&lon=-79&info=ir&zoom=2&width=1000&height=800&quality=95&type=Animation&palette=ir1.pal&numframes=10

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Eh...it's not really ventilation of the outflow that causes the strengthening, but you've basically got the right idea. QG dynamics will tell you that divergence occurs in the upper troposphere ahead of an upper level trough because the winds in a trough are subgeostrophic (and the winds in the downstream ridge are supergeostrophic). So the winds exiting the trough are faster, and you horizontally advect more mass out of a region ahead of a trough than you advect in. Coincidentally, this is also the area where you often see strong SW winds aloft, which causes the cirrus outflow to expand over a large area. But it is really the large-scale divergence and vertical motion in the upper-troposphere that allows the strengthening. This process is baroclinic enhancement of a tropical cyclone.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: Re:

#1798 Postby Alyono » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:13 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
HurriGuy wrote:what the heck??? faulty equipment right when passing through???


not sure but they were flying at 9 to 10 k feet not AF level at all..


Huh? AF ALWAYS flies at 10,000 ft at night for strong TS or canes
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: Re:

#1799 Postby Alyono » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:14 am

Time_Zone wrote:
Alyono wrote:EC is around 967 as it makes its closest approach to the Outer Banks

dont have the scaled winds yet, but it looks to be around 95-100 KT using the raw winds


I highly doubt it gets anywhere near 100 KTS


what reasoning do you have?
0 likes   

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

#1800 Postby HurriGuy » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:14 am

More deep convection fired up on east side with new frame.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2014”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests