Steve820 wrote:Hopefully it doesn't become named. I don't want any name-stealers. But, at least it became a tropical cyclone!
After what we had last year, I will take it. At least we are tracking something.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Steve820 wrote:Hopefully it doesn't become named. I don't want any name-stealers. But, at least it became a tropical cyclone!
blp wrote:Steve820 wrote:Hopefully it doesn't become named. I don't want any name-stealers. But, at least it became a tropical cyclone!
After what we had last year, I will take it. At least we are tracking something.
Steve820 wrote:Hopefully it doesn't become named. I don't want any name-stealers. But, at least it became a tropical cyclone!
Steve820 wrote:Hopefully it doesn't become named. I don't want any name-stealers. But, at least it became a tropical cyclone!
Hammy wrote:I'm not going to put too much stock into the intensity forecast for the time being, as this seems to have caught everyone off guard. Six hours from 20% to 70% then three hours later a TD, the models never forecasted even that, so it would not be surprising with that taken into account to see it make it to at least 45 mph.
Steve820 wrote:Hopefully it doesn't become named. I don't want any name-stealers. But, at least it became a tropical cyclone!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests