Alyono wrote:look how flat the western side is. This is shear. To get the surface feature, you must look west of the convection
You might be right because I don't think it has slowed down that much. We might see something pop out on the IR2.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Alyono wrote:look how flat the western side is. This is shear. To get the surface feature, you must look west of the convection
Hammy wrote:ozonepete wrote:Yellow Evan wrote:Except there is no well defined LLC, is there?
But we all know that when there's a very well defined MLC like this, and the other requisite conditions are right, an LLC can form underneath it in a few hours. That is what I would expect here, as long as the shear drops off rapidly tomorrow. And actually from satellite imagery, watching the cloud motion, it looks like the shear is already dropping off.
based on the cloud motion (the actual towers) it looks like a center may have formed or is currently forming over the eastern part of the Dominican Republic, and it also looks like it's moving much slower than earlier which should keep it from running into the shear wall to the west and give the upper level conditions time to improve.
LaBreeze wrote:Glad to see that this "system" will probably stay out of the GOM. My beach plans for Labor Day weekend will not be disturbed.
sunnyday wrote:Just checked some old pm's here. Does anyone know where Mike Watkins is? I always enjoyed his input. And what about Stephanie? They used to show up in situations like these.
toad strangler wrote:So many near closing assumptions are made from one model run to the next and so on. This will never change and I will never understand this behavior (it gets frustrating) which is why I don't post much!
hectopascal wrote:Could very well start to see models shift to a track quite similar to Hurricane Isaac's path.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Evil Jeremy wrote:toad strangler wrote:So many near closing assumptions are made from one model run to the next and so on. This will never change and I will never understand this behavior (it gets frustrating) which is why I don't post much!
This is a forum for weather enthusiasts. Can't blame us for getting enthusiastic.
hurrtracker79 wrote:hectopascal wrote:Could very well start to see models shift to a track quite similar to Hurricane Isaac's path.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
can you please explain your reasoning?
floridasun78 wrote:i think plane in system going now to 96l that will be put for 8am outlook or avd at 5am
floridasun78 wrote:If but is a big if they upgrade at 11 PM,this mission would go after midnight.
FLIGHT TWO -- TEAL 75
A. 23/0530Z, 1130Z
B. AFXXX 0404A CYCLONE
C. 23/0400Z
D. 21.0N 70.0W
E. 23/0515Z TO 23/1130Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
that from ATL: INVEST 96L - Recon
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest