ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139086
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#1 Postby cycloneye » Wed Oct 01, 2014 4:39 pm

Another Invest way north of MDR.

AL, 98, 2014100106, , BEST, 0, 310N, 560W, 30, 1012, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1014, 90, 30, 0, 0,
AL, 98, 2014100112, , BEST, 0, 325N, 550W, 30, 1012, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1014, 90, 30, 0, 0,
AL, 98, 2014100118, , BEST, 0, 339N, 541W, 30, 1012, DB, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1014, 90, 30, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, S


Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139086
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#2 Postby cycloneye » Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:14 pm

0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
TheStormExpert
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8487
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:38 pm
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL

#3 Postby TheStormExpert » Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:23 pm

Is this the area that was originally 97L which the NHC is now mentioning again I think? I'm really confused??
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by storm2k.org.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139086
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re:

#4 Postby cycloneye » Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:27 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:Is this the area that was originally 97L which the NHC is now mentioning again I think? I'm really confused??


New area well east of Bermuda.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139086
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#5 Postby cycloneye » Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:38 pm

8 PM EDT TWO:

A small area of low pressure located about 700 miles east-northeast
of Bermuda is producing disorganized showers and thunderstorms.
Significant development of this system is not expected while it
remains over marginally warm waters through Thursday. This low is
moving rapidly toward the northeast and is expected to move over
much colder waters by Friday, ending its chance of development as a
tropical cyclone.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...10 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...low...10 percent.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5594
Age: 40
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#6 Postby Hammy » Wed Oct 01, 2014 7:13 pm

Hard to tell if it's closed or not on satellite due to how fast it's moving.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#7 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Oct 01, 2014 7:23 pm

These types of storms tend to often be sleepers though - the ones that develop unexpectedly. Conditions in the high Atlantic are no more unfavorable than in a good year (as in, they aren't ever "ideal").
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139086
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#8 Postby cycloneye » Wed Oct 01, 2014 7:46 pm

00z Best Track:

AL, 98, 2014100200, , BEST, 0, 352N, 529W, 30, 1012, LO
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
TheStormExpert
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8487
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:38 pm
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL

Re:

#9 Postby TheStormExpert » Wed Oct 01, 2014 9:23 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:These types of storms tend to often be sleepers though - the ones that develop unexpectedly. Conditions in the high Atlantic are no more unfavorable than in a good year (as in, they aren't ever "ideal").

Conditions in this part of the Atlantic have not been much more ideal if you ask me than they have been in the other parts of the Atlantic, otherwise we could of seen a storm or two develop in this region already IMO.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by storm2k.org.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139086
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#10 Postby cycloneye » Thu Oct 02, 2014 6:51 am

A small area of low pressure located about 840 miles northeast
of Bermuda is moving rapidly toward the north-northeast and
is producing disorganized showers. Tropical cyclone formation is not
anticipated due to strong upper-level winds and decreasing sea
surface temperatures.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...near 0 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...low...near 0 percent.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139086
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#11 Postby cycloneye » Thu Oct 02, 2014 7:29 am

ATCF deactivated the invest.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
TheStormExpert
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8487
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:38 pm
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL

#12 Postby TheStormExpert » Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:14 pm

Not saying these invests are wasteful to be tagged, but why tag something an invest if it will only live 24-48hrs. at most? IMO it seems kind of silly, and I used to think they only tagged areas of interest that had some promising chance of developing?
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by storm2k.org.

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#13 Postby wxman57 » Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:48 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:Not saying these invests are wasteful to be tagged, but why tag something an invest if it will only live 24-48hrs. at most? IMO it seems kind of silly, and I used to think they only tagged areas of interest that had some promising chance of developing?


Initiating an invest doesn't mean anything other than the forecaster on duty wants to run some models on a feature. There is no requirement of development potential. Sometimes they may declare an invest simply to test software upgrades, or perhaps it could be to training exercise. There are valid reasons to initiate an invest for a system that isn't expected to develop.
0 likes   

SapphireSea
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:13 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#14 Postby SapphireSea » Thu Oct 02, 2014 4:51 pm

I would figure that most of these supercomputing resources stay idle more than 90% of the time which is the case with many SCs. I believe the invest tag really may be some bureaucracy that is loose in order to access computing resources despite the aforementioned fact. Also, these features could become large extratropical/gale features in which I assume is shared or available for other mets to process; inefficiency to create efficiency I suppose.

I would figure the actual cost to us is nearly nil to tag an invest. No complaints from me. I think its onward to Carrib; and close down ATL's shop for the year with the 2nd or 3rd longwave after this one.
0 likes   
Forecast Disclaimer:

Don't be stupid. Make your own informed decisions.


Return to “2014”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests