
18 GMT 07/6/13 8.0N 34.8W 25 1009 Invest
00 GMT 07/7/13 8.2N 36.4W 25 1009 Invest
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Cyclenall wrote:Gustywind wrote:0z Models guidance
3rd time the charm? Still no intensity forecast on it.
EDIT: I got an strange error that said, "The requested post does not exist" ... never seen that one before. The 3rd repeat is now also removed.
Alyono wrote:I have no idea as to why NHC says environmental conditions will be more favorable in a few days. All indications from the models are for a significant increase in shear as this approaches the islands.
As for its current state, easterly wind shear is taking its toll on this this evening. The center is well east of the convection. Still a 50 percent chance of development through the next 48, but if it doesnt develop within that time period, it likely wont develop it at all
Alyono wrote:I have no idea as to why NHC says environmental conditions will be more favorable in a few days. All indications from the models are for a significant increase in shear as this approaches the islands.
As for its current state, easterly wind shear is taking its toll on this this evening. The center is well east of the convection. Still a 50 percent chance of development through the next 48, but if it doesnt develop within that time period, it likely wont develop it at all
Aric Dunn wrote:SAL doesn't always mean no development. It is situated in a nice pocket of moist air in the mid and upper levels. the SAL is lagging behind the system and to the north. so far considering all that have mentioned sal being around it have not noticed despite it the convection has not only maintained but increased this afternoon.
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/m ... t72hrs.gif
NDG wrote:Just by the looks of its satellite presentation, easterly shear seems to be more of the problem in all levels of the atmosphere thus why it may have a problem closing a circulation off at the surface.
Tonight's 0z GFS model has it approaching Barbados Monday night, that is a fast track westward!
blp wrote:Updated:
CrazyC83 wrote:blp wrote:Updated:
That seems quite reasonable given the trough pattern. I see any north turn being near 80W.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests