
This is what you look for if you want to see an annular Tropical Cyclone:

Moderator: S2k Moderators
euro6208 wrote:ozonepete wrote:GCANE wrote:7C core temp - a monster
Wow! You won't see that very often, for sure.
not really...those high readings are very common here and in fact Typhoon Wipha earlier this month had an 11C core temp...
dexterlabio wrote:I also don't think this is annular. If you want to see an annular supertyphoon, look for STY Sanba from last year. Either way, annular or not, Francisco looks very impressive. I am not sure though if it surpassed Usagi...IMO I was more in awe by Usagi's appearance and sheer size at its peak..
And here we go again with JTWC's late upgrade to STY, IMO Francisco was a supertyphoon AND a Category 5 much earlier...
GCANE wrote:7C core temp - a monster
dexterlabio wrote:Hey DT numbers are dropping. Just as they upgraded it to a Cat5? Looks like EWRC is taking its toll now...
phwxenthusiast wrote:GCANE wrote:7C core temp - a monster
isn't this the "anomaly" of the temp (in this case +7) in the core?? i read somewhere that is based near the troposphere hundreds of km away from the center.. or maybe i'm reading the graph wrong...
ozonepete wrote:phwxenthusiast wrote:isn't this the "anomaly" of the temp (in this case +7) in the core?? i read somewhere that is based near the troposphere hundreds of km away from the center.. or maybe i'm reading the graph wrong...
Yes. It's not the actual temp readings but the departure from what's expected. Although I don't know what you mean by "based near the troposphere hundreds of km away from the center" ??
dexterlabio wrote:I also don't think this is annular. If you want to see an annular supertyphoon, look for STY Sanba from last year. Either way, annular or not, Francisco looks very impressive. I am not sure though if it surpassed Usagi...IMO I was more in awe by Usagi's appearance and sheer size at its peak..
And here we go again with JTWC's late upgrade to STY, IMO Francisco was a supertyphoon AND a Category 5 much earlier...
I said you don't see it very often.
So you're saying you do see it very often?
euro6208 wrote:I said you don't see it very often.
So you're saying you do see it very often?
yes
Fyzn94 wrote:Well, sure, I was hesitant in saying that it WAS annular, but it does seem pretty close if you consider that the intensity has been nearly steady for the past 12-24 hours and it's not expected to change drastically for the next day or two.
ozonepete wrote:
Hi dex! Yeah I agree, although right now this looks to have incredibly good symmetry, I think even more than Usagi had at its best.
Yeah I agree on it being almost annular, it has very nice symmetry (made it seem to have no banding) and looks to have helped maintaining that intensity for a long time... But I don't know, IMO Sanba looks closer to being "annular" lol.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests