ATL: CHANTAL - Post-Tropical

'CaneFreak · #3421 Postby **'CaneFreak** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:08 pm

That site has it's pluses and it's minuses. It really doesn't have any good satellite channel options like the SSD one. I really like the RGB and the rainbow.

SouthFloridawx wrote:That's part of the reason why I started using this site. It doesn't go back as far, but it does the job.

http://weather.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/

#3422 Postby **cycloneye** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:09 pm

The title of thread will change to Invest 96L- Remnants of Chantal

'CaneFreak · #3423 Postby **'CaneFreak** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:11 pm

There's nothing at those coordinates... :lol:

Those silly gooses...

Edit: It looks like they are following the center of the old upper low or something.

cycloneye wrote:
AL, 96, 2013071118, , BEST, 0, 224N, 780W, 25, 1013, WV

#3424 Postby **ozonepete** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:16 pm

I also am going crazy with the satellite loop problems. Been going on since yesterday evening for me. Really annoying.

#3425 Postby **SouthFloridawx** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:16 pm

Whatever it's going to do, it better do it fast.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

#3426 Postby **ozonepete** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:17 pm

The 96L change is crazy. Really can't figure it out. ???

#3427 Postby **ozonepete** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:19 pm

Don't forget you can use Colo State RAMSDIS. It's not missing frames..

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... opical.asp

Aric Dunn · #3428 Postby **Aric Dunn** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:20 pm

ozonepete wrote:The 96L change is crazy. Really can't figure it out. ???

The low level circ is no longer discernible and from their rule change a couple years ago they re classify them.

Riptide · #3429 Postby **Riptide** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:21 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
ozonepete wrote:The 96L change is crazy. Really can't figure it out. ???

The low level circ is no longer discernible and from their rule change a couple years ago they re classify them.

With this in mind, can the NHC reuse the name "Chantal"?

Hurricaneman · #3430 Postby **Hurricaneman** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:21 pm

It won't cause confusion to the everyday person who stumbles on the weather channel, but to weather enthusiast its confusing and naming something something else doesn't change the entity

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

#3431 Postby **ozonepete** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:21 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
ozonepete wrote:The 96L change is crazy. Really can't figure it out. ???

The low level circ is no longer discernible and from their rule change a couple years ago they re classify them.

Ok, thanks, Aric. I vaguely remember that.

#3432 Postby **cycloneye** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:21 pm

ozonepete wrote:The 96L change is crazy. Really can't figure it out. ???

Yes,kinda strange as NRL has no change yet. Let's see in the next few minutes if they do so. I don't want to think that they will consider this 96L as Dorian if it redevelops.

#3433 Postby **ozonepete** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:22 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:It won't cause confusion to the everyday person who stumbles on the weather channel, but to weather enthusiast its confusing and naming something something else doesn't change the entity

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Would be crazy if this became Dorian when it's really Chantal, lol. :roll:

Edited to fix spelling of Dorian

Aric Dunn · #3434 Postby **Aric Dunn** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:22 pm

Riptide wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
ozonepete wrote:The 96L change is crazy. Really can't figure it out. ???

The low level circ is no longer discernible and from their rule change a couple years ago they re classify them.

With this in mind, can the NHC reuse the name "Chantal"?

nope it would be dorian

#3435 Postby **ozonepete** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:23 pm

Aric Dunn wrote: nope it would be dorian

Isn't that reincarnation?

Riptide · #3436 Postby **Riptide** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:24 pm

One could make a case for a separate entity but most would agree that Dorian would become another name-waster from NHC. Mabye the number of named cyclones is not very important anymore; rather the ACE is a more accurate measurement.

#3437 Postby **SouthFloridawx** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:25 pm

Maybe if you are Buddhist.

ozonepete wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote: nope it would be dorian

Isn't that reincarnation?

#3438 Postby **cycloneye** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:26 pm

I took the Remnants of Chantal off the title until there is more clarity about this.

#3439 Postby **Evil Jeremy** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:26 pm

For any fans of the show "Scrubs" in here, I'm sure there's a bunch of jokes to be made right now (main character's name was Dorian).

Hurricaneman · #3440 Postby **Hurricaneman** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:27 pm

All the headers if this gets renamed should be Chantal\Dorian as it would be the same entity

Heres my opinion on this right now, it looks like its starting to become more organized so it wouldn't surprise me at all to see a tropical storm again by tomorrow night

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

ATL: CHANTAL - Post-Tropical

Re: Re:

Re: ATL: CHANTAL - Remnants - Discussion

Re: ATL: CHANTAL - Remnants - Discussion

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Remnants of Chantal - Discussion

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Remnants of Chantal - Discussion

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Remnants of Chantal - Discussion

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Remnants of Chantal - Discussion

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Remnants of Chantal - Discussion

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Remnants of Chantal - Discussion

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Remnants of Chantal - Discussion

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Remnants of Chantal - Discussion

Re:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Remnants of Chantal - Discussion

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Remnants of Chantal - Discussion

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Remnants of Chantal - Discussion

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Remnants of Chantal - Discussion

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Remnants of Chantal - Discussion

Who is online