ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#241 Postby ROCK » Thu Aug 15, 2013 12:48 am

CYCLONE MIKE wrote:Windshield wiper effects still going at high speed. This is becoming almost comedic. That is two huge swings by gfs and cmc.



Agree...it's almost worthless to look at them now...for me anyway
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139141
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#242 Postby cycloneye » Thu Aug 15, 2013 7:50 am

WHXX01 KWBC 151230
CHGHUR
TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE MESSAGE
NWS NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1230 UTC THU AUG 15 2013

DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
AND SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE INFORMATION.

ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR

DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL922013) 20130815 1200 UTC

...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS... ...36 HRS...
130815 1200 130816 0000 130816 1200 130817 0000

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 18.8N 87.6W 19.7N 89.7W 20.2N 91.3W 20.5N 92.7W
BAMD 18.8N 87.6W 19.3N 89.2W 19.5N 90.6W 19.7N 92.2W
BAMM 18.8N 87.6W 19.5N 89.3W 19.8N 90.8W 20.1N 92.4W
LBAR 18.8N 87.6W 19.8N 89.4W 20.9N 91.3W 22.1N 93.2W
SHIP 25KTS 26KTS 30KTS 37KTS
DSHP 25KTS 26KTS 31KTS 38KTS

...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS... ..120 HRS...
130817 1200 130818 1200 130819 1200 130820 1200

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 20.6N 94.0W 20.6N 96.7W 20.2N 99.6W 19.8N 102.5W
BAMD 19.9N 93.7W 20.3N 96.5W 20.6N 98.8W 20.9N 101.0W
BAMM 20.2N 93.8W 20.4N 96.6W 20.2N 99.2W 20.0N 101.9W
LBAR 23.5N 94.5W 27.7N 95.3W 32.6N 93.8W 36.3N 89.2W
SHIP 44KTS 52KTS 55KTS 55KTS
DSHP 45KTS 53KTS 33KTS 27KTS

...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 18.8N LONCUR = 87.6W DIRCUR = 300DEG SPDCUR = 10KT
LATM12 = 17.8N LONM12 = 85.9W DIRM12 = 296DEG SPDM12 = 11KT
LATM24 = 17.1N LONM24 = 83.7W
WNDCUR = 25KT RMAXWD = 80NM WNDM12 = 30KT
CENPRS = 1008MB OUTPRS = 1010MB OUTRAD = 200NM SDEPTH = M
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM

0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#243 Postby HouTXmetro » Thu Aug 15, 2013 10:46 am

Nothing to see here? Have all the models written the area off?
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#244 Postby ROCK » Thu Aug 15, 2013 10:51 am

I have been posting so much I forgot I needed to work for a living... :lol:
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#245 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Aug 15, 2013 11:07 am

Once it gets into the BOC, it looks like its track could be quite erratic. The trough looks to leave this behind, and that means steering currents collapse?
0 likes   

User avatar
Rgv20
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2456
Age: 37
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Edinburg/McAllen Tx

Re:

#246 Postby Rgv20 » Thu Aug 15, 2013 11:16 am

CrazyC83 wrote:Once it gets into the BOC, it looks like its track could be quite erratic. The trough looks to leave this behind, and that means steering currents collapse?


Correct, if it manages to hold together and head to the BOC a second landfall could come in as late as Tuesday. It could easily just dissipate as the trough keeps robbing it moisture....We shall see what happens.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6355
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#247 Postby Dean4Storms » Thu Aug 15, 2013 11:38 am

12z GFS brings a sheared TS into P'Cola with 50kt winds at 900mb on Sunday.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6617
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re:

#248 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Aug 15, 2013 11:40 am

I think it showed the same thing on Monday.


Dean4Storms wrote:12z GFS brings a sheared TS into P'Cola with 50kt winds at 900mb on Sunday.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6355
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#249 Postby Dean4Storms » Thu Aug 15, 2013 11:41 am

NAVGEM 12z still AL/MS area with TS...

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis ... _watl.html
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: Re:

#250 Postby ROCK » Thu Aug 15, 2013 11:43 am

Stormcenter wrote:I think it showed the same thing on Monday.


Dean4Storms wrote:12z GFS brings a sheared TS into P'Cola with 50kt winds at 900mb on Sunday.



:lol: :lol:
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6355
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: Re:

#251 Postby Dean4Storms » Thu Aug 15, 2013 11:43 am

Stormcenter wrote:I think it showed the same thing on Monday.


Dean4Storms wrote:12z GFS brings a sheared TS into P'Cola with 50kt winds at 900mb on Sunday.


I think you're right. Back to where it once belonged. :D
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6355
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#252 Postby Dean4Storms » Thu Aug 15, 2013 12:14 pm

12z GGEM toward the FL Panhandle with a TS.


http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis ... _watl.html
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#253 Postby ROCK » Thu Aug 15, 2013 12:24 pm

yep they are getting comical as they all seem to hedge their bets and leave something behind in the BOC. Honestly I dont think what the CMC forms is 92L but one of her offspring... :lol:


EURO out in a few....that will clear things up...ha
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23499
Age: 46
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re:

#254 Postby gatorcane » Thu Aug 15, 2013 12:25 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:12z GGEM toward the FL Panhandle with a TS.


http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis ... _watl.html

You will also notice from this loop it also develops Pouch 20L and has it just north of the Leewards in 126 hours.

That pouch is being discussed here:

viewtopic.php?f=31&t=115379
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#255 Postby ROCK » Thu Aug 15, 2013 12:30 pm

12Z NAM is all over the place also....sends something from the top portion of this wave to MS/AL....leaves something in the BOC that starts to head towards TX at 84hr...crazy NAM!!
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6355
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#256 Postby Dean4Storms » Thu Aug 15, 2013 12:39 pm

Could have a split in this. The northern part maybe even more sub-tropical and highly sheared.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8606
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#257 Postby Steve » Thu Aug 15, 2013 1:22 pm

For the record, late this past Sunday night. ;)

PS the caveat could be split energy with some riding up the front and the rest moving west across the yucatan...

This was a point to a post regarding some of the differences in the model camps and possibly why.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#258 Postby ROCK » Thu Aug 15, 2013 1:29 pm

Steve wrote:For the record, late this past Sunday night. ;)

PS the caveat could be split energy with some riding up the front and the rest moving west across the yucatan...

This was a point to a post regarding some of the differences in the model camps and possibly why.

Steve



nice call Steve.....
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8606
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#259 Postby Steve » Thu Aug 15, 2013 2:18 pm

Thanks Rock. That was from a discussion us night owls were having after you posted the NAVGEM's solution of having energy sit down in the bottom lip (?) of the BOC. At the time, I had that as 3rd most likely possibility (favoring North Mex/South Tex and then FL Panhandle). But the way a piece of the energy could certainly end up in the extreme Southern Gulf was if it was a wave moving through after decoupling (whether or not it evolved on that side of the Yucatan or if it just piled up and sort of stalled or slowed down there).

As an aside, this year on Bob Breck's Weathering the Storm, they interviewed a typical weather geek (could have been any of us, but it wasn't me) whose page was actually on Storm2k during the interview. The reporter asked a question about all the information on the web - essentially is there too much, is it too confusing, do enthusiasts know what they're talking about, etc. He said that you just have to learn to filter who and what out there is of value. The stuff I usually filter out is the state wars. I even go a step further (regardless if it undermines my credibility) by often arguing against anything hitting here in SELA unelss it's obvious (e.g. Gustav 08, Cindy & Katrina 05, Isaac 12, Bill 03, Matthew 04, etc.). The stuff that's posted in good fun (like you usually do with a smile face) is all good. It's the posts where people take their "turf" too seriously and argue for every wobble, model change, etc. that I filter out. Hey, at least it's something learned over the years. :flag:
Steve
Last edited by Steve on Thu Aug 15, 2013 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8606
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

#260 Postby Steve » Thu Aug 15, 2013 2:20 pm

>>yep they are getting comical as they all seem to hedge their bets and leave something behind in the BOC. Honestly I dont think what the CMC forms is 92L but one of her offspring...

You are the model king. What was the one Monday or Tuesday (CMC???) that sat a piece of energy down the BOC and ejected up like 2 or 3 other "closed" isobar pieces?
0 likes   


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests