bexar wrote:for a supposedly La Nina year, the cmc develops 4 storms in the EPAC within the next 10 days. Shouldn't the EPAC be already inactive this time around in a La Nina year?
Don't take the CMC (Constantly Makes Cyclones) cyclogenesis verbatim, the HPC long range discussion yesterday provides a good example
OVERALL...THE 00 UTC ECMWF/CANADIAN/UKMET AND TRENDS FROM THE
LATEST 12 UTC ECMWF SEEM IN GOOD AGREEMENT WITHIN THE ENSEMBLE
SPREAD FOR THESE SCENARIOS AND PREFER A COMPROMISE OF THEIR WELL
CLUSTERED SOLUTIONS INTO MON...ALBEIT WITH GULF LOW DEVELOPMENT
OPEN TO ADJUSTMENT AFTER COORDINATION WITH NHC. BY TUE/WED WE
LOSE THE UKMET AND THE 00 UTC CANADIAN OFFERS SUSPECT DEVELOPMENT
OF TWO SURFACE LOWS FROM THE NW MOVING MID-LEVEL LOW IN THE ERN
GULF OF MEX AND HAS A MORE ZONAL LOOK TO THE FLOW PATTERN ACROSS
CANADA THAN SEEN ON THE OTHER GUIDANCE. ACCORDINGLY...HPC PROGS
INSTEAD REMAIN PRIMARILY DERIVED FROM A BLEND OF THE COMPATABLE
00Z ECMWF/ECMWF ENSEMBLE MEAN TUE/WED.