Global model runs discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
BigB0882
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2284
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

#5201 Postby BigB0882 » Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:38 pm

I seriously doubt we have to wait until late August for things to get going. The MJO is not the ONLY thing controlling tropical formation. The MJO is much more important early in the season when conditions are not yet as good as they will be. When we get into the heart of the season, which is mid August, the conditions are good enough for things to get going even without the MJO in the more favorable phases. This is how I understand it, at least.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re:

#5202 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:50 pm

ninel conde wrote:if things dont pick up by late august its onto next season.

This is a ridiculous post.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

TheStormExpert

Re:

#5203 Postby TheStormExpert » Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:07 pm

BigB0882 wrote:I seriously doubt we have to wait until late August for things to get going. The MJO is not the ONLY thing controlling tropical formation. The MJO is much more important early in the season when conditions are not yet as good as they will be. When we get into the heart of the season, which is mid August, the conditions are good enough for things to get going even without the MJO in the more favorable phases. This is how I understand it, at least.

I know 2004 is a good example of how quickly things can heat up once we head into early/mid August. But I also have been on here for a few years now and don't remember the MJO being as much as an problem if not present for development as it seems to be this year, overall I feel like I have been hearing the term MJO a lot since about the beginning of May and how big of a factor it is for development. I jut currently have funny feeling that this season is not going to be close to as bad as forecasters are predicting, I feel like they may bust with their forecast again just like last year. JMO
0 likes   

BigB0882
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2284
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

#5204 Postby BigB0882 » Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:13 pm

I have also heard much more about the MJO this year, as though it is the only way to predict a storm. I wonder why that is. It seems odd that I don't remember so much talk about it before, is the MJO more important this season for some reason? I think the MJO has just been important early in the season and we will forget all about it by mid August when conditions don't require the MJO to be in phase 1 or 2.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22785
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re:

#5205 Postby Ntxw » Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:19 pm

BigB0882 wrote:I have also heard much more about the MJO this year, as though it is the only way to predict a storm. I wonder why that is. It seems odd that I don't remember so much talk about it before, is the MJO more important this season for some reason? I think the MJO has just been important early in the season and we will forget all about it by mid August when conditions don't require the MJO to be in phase 1 or 2.


I think it's simply people are understanding better the role it plays. You are absolutely correct we do not need the MJO for activity. An oceanic Kelvin wave can do it as well. It's just that the past several seasons various factors have inhibited development early on, and so far this year much has been the same. It's been hostile with storms moving too fast or shear in the vicinity etc without the MJO. When the MJO moves over it can overcome this and we see development in bundles, that's why it's been handy. Once in the peak season, less emphasis will be put on the MJO (though study clearly shows when you have favorable phases there is a significant amount of storms that not only become hurricanes but major hurricanes).

Last year, if I recall correctly the August frenzy happened during the 1-2-3 octants as well as Sandy.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10146
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: Global Model Runs Discussion

#5206 Postby Blown Away » Fri Jul 19, 2013 11:48 am

12z GFS develops a low off Africa in 4 days and loses it east of the islands in 9 days and carries the wave through the Caribbean towards Yucatan...Elsewhere, pretty quiet.
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

ninel conde

Re: Global Model Runs Discussion

#5207 Postby ninel conde » Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:32 pm

Blown Away wrote:12z GFS develops a low off Africa in 4 days and loses it east of the islands in 9 days and carries the wave through the Caribbean towards Yucatan...Elsewhere, pretty quiet.


i think i can see why. pressures are much too high in the tropics.
0 likes   

ninel conde

#5208 Postby ninel conde » Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:43 pm

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ecmwf-op ... hour=240hr

Euro out to 240 isnt too positive for development. pressures too high in the tropics, NAO looks a bit negative and low pressure is ove se canada with a trough off the east coast. if the lower pressures that are over the tropical pacific were over the atlantic we would be in business. pretty amazing we are seeing 1016-1020mb pressures dominating the tropics.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2811
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

#5209 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:49 pm

Remember everyone it often doesn't matter how many storms there are. What is far more important is where they go, and how strong they are when they get there. Both 1991 and 1992 had few storms. 1991 had category 3 (cat. 2 at landfall) Hurricane Bob and the Perfect Storm. 1992 had category 5 Hurricane Andrew. Need I write more.
0 likes   

User avatar
somethingfunny
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 3926
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: McKinney, Texas

Re: Global Model Runs Discussion

#5210 Postby somethingfunny » Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:58 pm

supercane4867 wrote:Go home GFS, you're drunk

Image


This is why I haven't been paying attention at all yet. :lol:
0 likes   
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145330
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Global Model Runs Discussion

#5211 Postby cycloneye » Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:17 pm

Well folks, 18z GFS has a CV wave developing in 84 hours. Let's see what it has after this down the timeframe.

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
AtlanticWind
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1889
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Plantation,Fla

#5212 Postby AtlanticWind » Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:21 pm

http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?mode ... _thick.gif

It still hangs on to the system out to 147 hours.Could be are next player.
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#5213 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:35 pm

994mb @ 192 hours:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145330
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Global Model Runs Discussion

#5214 Postby cycloneye » Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:41 pm

I prefer to wait for the more complete data 00z run to see if it has it before I get enthusiastic. :)
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#5215 Postby RL3AO » Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:45 pm

I'm just glad we're tracking something under 200 hours away. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#5216 Postby gatorcane » Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:51 pm

18Z GFS 228 and 288 hour images:

Image

Image
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: Global Model Runs Discussion

#5217 Postby Alyono » Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:09 pm

cycloneye wrote:I prefer to wait for the more complete data 00z run to see if it has it before I get enthusiastic. :)


As I already said, the 18Z has nearly as much data as does the 0Z. You're operating 10 years in the past when you say 18Z has much less than 0. Satellite data is actually now assimilated with realistic weights into the models (remember, without the sat data, the models would have butchered Sandy)
0 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: Global Model Runs Discussion

#5218 Postby TheStormExpert » Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:45 pm

Alyono wrote:
cycloneye wrote:I prefer to wait for the more complete data 00z run to see if it has it before I get enthusiastic. :)


As I already said, the 18Z has nearly as much data as does the 0Z. You're operating 10 years in the past when you say 18Z has much less than 0. Satellite data is actually now assimilated with realistic weights into the models (remember, without the sat data, the models would have butchered Sandy)

The way I always thought and looked at it was the 0z is the best followed by 12z, 18z, and 6z in that order. (From best to worst) JMO.

Of course models do improve over the years so they are probably all good now.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#5219 Postby gatorcane » Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:51 pm

A couple of more images from the 18Z GFS run:

312 hours:
Image

348 hours:
Image
Last edited by gatorcane on Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145330
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Global Model Runs Discussion

#5220 Postby cycloneye » Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:51 pm

The difference this run has from prior runs by GFS is it starts to develop in less than 96 hours. Let's see if this model on the operational and it's ensembles continue with this. Also,let's see if the ECMWF joins later.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here


Return to “2015”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests