ATL: HERMINE - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
stormhunter7
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 762
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 3:13 pm
Location: Panama City Beach, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1461 Postby stormhunter7 » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:18 pm

btw, recon hit what should be the center at 16:50:30Z Coordinates: 18.733N 64.500W Acft. Static Air Press: 988.5 mb Acft. Geopotential Hgt: 177 m (581 ft) Extrap. Sfc. Press: 1008.7 mb (29.79 inHg)
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1462 Postby HurriGuy » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:18 pm

As long as the LLC keeps pulsing the convection near south and southeast side of it, I don't see this going anywhere.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Siker
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 904
Age: 28
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:36 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1463 Postby Siker » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:19 pm

HurriGuy wrote:from the 00z ECMWF, it did not have a stacked system until Friday 00z. I don't know what everyone was expecting today. So far the model hasn't missed a beat. Had the system decoupled at 18z today pretty severely


Yes, the divergence between the Euro and GFS starts most notably in 24 hours when the Euro has upper level vorticity redeveloping over the low level vorticity maximum while the GFS keeps any upper level vorticity displaced 200 miles to the east.
0 likes   

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1464 Postby xironman » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:19 pm

There is something going on out there

Code: Select all

Product: Air Force Tropical RECCO Message (URNT11 KNHC)
Transmitted: 24th day of the month at 17:14Z
Agency: United States Air Force
Aircraft: Lockheed WC-130J Hercules with reg. number AF98-5308
Mission Purpose: Investigate fourth suspect area (flight in the North Atlantic basin)
Mission Number: 2
Observation Number: 10

Mandatory Data...

Observation Time: 17:05Z on Wednesday
Coordinates: 18.8N 64.0W
Location: 138 statute miles (222 km) to the E (79°) from San Juan, Puerto Rico (U.S.).
Pressure Altitude: 180 meters (591 feet)
Flight Level Wind: From 160° at 54 knots (From the SSE at ~ 62.1 mph)
- The above is a spot wind.
- Winds were obtained using doppler radar or inertial systems.
Flight Level Air Temperature: 22°C (72°F)
Flight Level Dew Point: 18°C (64°F)
Weather (within 30 nm): Shower(s) (continuous or intermittent precipitation - from cumuliform clouds)
Turbulence: Light
Conditions Along Flight Route: In and out of clouds
Radar Capability: Yes
Mean Sea Level Pressure (MSLP): 1010 mb (29.83 inHg), extrapolated

Additional Data...

Estimated Surface Wind: From 160° at 50 knots (From the SSE at ~ 57.5 mph
1 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1465 Postby RL3AO » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:21 pm

Looks like some northern shear over the main convection. Did the convection lag behind the anti-cyclone?
0 likes   

User avatar
setexholmes
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 20
Age: 36
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2016 6:29 am
Location: Port Arthur, Tx

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1466 Postby setexholmes » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:23 pm

That last euro run has a few people here in Port Arthur a little worried. Looking forward to the next run and what it will tell us. I know it's a long way out but I may go pick up some supplies today.
1 likes   
The comments and opinions I make are borderline crazy and should not be taken too seriously. Please consult NOAA for information.

User avatar
Tireman4
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5853
Age: 59
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Humble, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1467 Postby Tireman4 » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:25 pm

setexholmes wrote:That last euro run has a few people here in Port Arthur a little worried. Looking forward to the next run and what it will tell us. I know it's a long way out but I may go pick up some supplies today.


Still have a long ways to go, much information to be ingested into the models, lots of factors to consider. That being said, it is never "not" a bad time to update your hurricane kits.
1 likes   

User avatar
JaxGator
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:33 pm
Location: Jacksonville Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1468 Postby JaxGator » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:26 pm

RL3AO wrote:Looks like some northern shear over the main convection. Did the convection lag behind the anti-cyclone?


Yes. It's a bit west of the convection. It shows up good on the shear maps.
0 likes   
The posts or stuff said are NOT an official forecast. Please look to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.

Floyd-1999, Frances-2004, Jeanne-2004, Fay-2008, Beryl-2012, Debby-2012, Colin-2016, Hermine-2016, Julia-2016, Matthew-2016, Irma-2017, Elsa-2021, Idalia-2023, Debby-2024, Helene-2024.


Go Gators! Go Jags!

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1469 Postby tolakram » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:30 pm

If you step through the shear maps you can see it has backed off a little in the last 3 hours.

The models have shown this struggling until very near Florida so this is expected, but I don;t blame people for doubting it base on experiences from the last few years.

http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/w ... oom=&time=
3 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1189
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1470 Postby Weatherboy1 » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:31 pm

With those kind of winds, I'm actually somewhat surprised they haven't just gone ahead and called this thing a TD. We've seen relatively sheared systems like this get named/designated before. A few naked swirl/displaced convection-type systems off the coast of FL, particularly at the beginning of a couple of seasons, come to mind. Obviously, a lack of convection over the center and probably some worry about naming the thing only to have it fall apart a few hours later are probably to blame. But seems to pretty much meet the requirements for a TD here ...
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4769
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1471 Postby psyclone » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:32 pm

A vigorous disturbance rolling across a few thousand miles of tropical/subtropical waters in late August is likely to eventually find a sweet spot and form. The shear looks to abate in a couple of days and the system will have had a chance to clear Hispaniola (even skirting the north shore would disrupt inflow)...so we just need to do more of what we always do...hurry up and wait. I would not be the least shocked if a strong TS or category 1 blasts across south florida on its way to the Gulf.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 42
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1472 Postby Hammy » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:32 pm

I'm jumping back on the no-development train with this, I still have a bet riding on nothing coming of it. The shear was not forecast by any of the models to be this strong at this point and it's essentially being shredded. Basically Erika 2015 redux.

RL3AO wrote:Looks like some northern shear over the main convection. Did the convection lag behind the anti-cyclone?


It moved WNW-NW while the anticyclone kept moving straight west by the looks of it.
Last edited by Hammy on Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion - Special Tropical Weather Outlook issued

#1473 Postby fci » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:33 pm

KWT wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:finally finding west winds..


Yeah, I don't think there is debate to be had that there is at least one circulation present, I feel its more a question of whether or not the organisation justifies it right now...

With that being said, if this is 100 miles from the coast of the USA...it gets an upgrade...if its at 40W, no upgrade.


I respectfully disagree with your assertion.
If it meets the criteria, they upgrade; no matter the location.
With no convection around a swirl and convection really hundreds of miles south, this is a classic tropical wave albeit a strong one.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!

StormHunter72
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 6:36 am
Location: Nature Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1474 Postby StormHunter72 » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:33 pm

Hammy wrote:I'm jumping back on the no-development train with this, I still have a bet riding on nothing coming of it. The shear was not forecast by any of the models to be this strong at this point and it's essentially being shredded. Basically Erika 2015 redux.
check out remnants of fionna. playing a big part.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1475 Postby SoupBone » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:35 pm

Hammy wrote:I'm jumping back on the no-development train with this, I still have a bet riding on nothing coming of it. The shear was not forecast by any of the models to be this strong at this point and it's essentially being shredded. Basically Erika 2015 redux.


I would love for you to be right, but I just don't see it. However, I noted a page or so back that the shear is increasing in the GoM according to the last few updates on the shear charts. Is that what the models are sniffing at for keeping this in check?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

OntarioEggplant
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion - Special Tropical Weather Outlook issued

#1476 Postby OntarioEggplant » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:36 pm

fci wrote:
KWT wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:finally finding west winds..


Yeah, I don't think there is debate to be had that there is at least one circulation present, I feel its more a question of whether or not the organisation justifies it right now...

With that being said, if this is 100 miles from the coast of the USA...it gets an upgrade...if its at 40W, no upgrade.


I respectfully disagree with your assertion.
If it meets the criteria, they upgrade; no matter the location.
With no convection around a swirl and convection really hundreds of miles south, this is a classic tropical wave albeit a strong one.


A wave isn't closed off, a low is. If recon can close a low, then it isn't a wave anymore.
0 likes   

User avatar
alienstorm
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 1:29 pm
Location: Miami Fla western suburb

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1477 Postby alienstorm » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:36 pm

Here is a shot from the San Juan Radar

Image
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1478 Postby fci » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:36 pm

HurriGuy wrote:from the 00z ECMWF, it did not have a stacked system until Friday 00z. I don't know what everyone was expecting today. So far the model hasn't missed a beat. Had the system decoupled at 18z today pretty severely


People are just understandably anxious. Models showing possible TC hitting South Florida in 4 days and then maybe a Cat 3 in GOM bathrub; makes people impatient to actually see "something".
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1479 Postby AutoPenalti » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:37 pm

Shear increasing... This thing is dying. NHC should lower its chances now. I don't see it making it.
Last edited by AutoPenalti on Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

StormHunter72
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 6:36 am
Location: Nature Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1480 Postby StormHunter72 » Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:37 pm

alienstorm wrote:Here is a shot from the San Juan Radar

Image
looks like an open wave at best.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests