ATL: HERMINE - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
Levi Cowan @TropicalTidbits · 1h1 hour ago
99L still has a robust wave signature. SSW winds of 20kt is a healthy sign. Means development still possible later.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CqzZQEXWgAAtIih.jpg
99L still has a robust wave signature. SSW winds of 20kt is a healthy sign. Means development still possible later.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CqzZQEXWgAAtIih.jpg
1 likes
The posts or stuff said are NOT an official forecast. Please look to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.
Floyd-1999, Frances-2004, Jeanne-2004, Fay-2008, Beryl-2012, Debby-2012, Colin-2016, Hermine-2016, Julia-2016, Matthew-2016, Irma-2017, Elsa-2021, Idalia-2023, Debby-2024, Helene-2024.
Go Gators! Go Jags!
Floyd-1999, Frances-2004, Jeanne-2004, Fay-2008, Beryl-2012, Debby-2012, Colin-2016, Hermine-2016, Julia-2016, Matthew-2016, Irma-2017, Elsa-2021, Idalia-2023, Debby-2024, Helene-2024.
Go Gators! Go Jags!
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
Frank2 wrote:I just realized a 99L is also interacting with a ULL between it and Florida - not sure if the ULL is weakening or strengthening:
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... imated.gif
Hard to tell but there's no doubt that right now, 99L looks like it could use some viagra if relying on its own convection to push back against that shear
1 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
Sheer is still greatly receding according to latest sheer tendency map. But as pointed out, I don't know how reliable it is
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
It looks like the convection is hardly moving west... looks like strong westerly wind shear.
2 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4035
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
Starting to disorganize a little bit, those mountains are really hurting it.
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
Lower convergence hasn't improved, though. Here is the latest.
Here is 3 hours ago
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 7188
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
SeGaBob wrote:Storms seem to have waned the last couple of frames...still a lot better than yesterday though.
nighttime is prime time for 99l..lets see
1 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
jlauderdal wrote:SeGaBob wrote:Storms seem to have waned the last couple of frames...still a lot better than yesterday though.
nighttime is prime time for 99l..lets see
Yes I agree
0 likes
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
Storms already falling apart it just cannot keep convection. Maybe things will change but I personally doubt it. Shear will find a way to pop back up on top of the storm in the future. It is a fighter but knowing the GFS and ECMWF keep it weak is a good sign.
1 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
tarheelprogrammer wrote:Storms already falling apart it just cannot keep convection. Maybe things will change but I personally doubt it. Shear will find a way to pop back up on top of the storm in the future. It is a fighter but knowing the GFS and ECMWF keep it weak is a good sign.
on the contrary convection is still refining. besides the coming and going of convection is quite normal at this stage.
3 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
I feel the need to point out, that even a day or 2 ago, majority of the models did not have any formation till Saturday. All of the models including the HWRF had this severe lag of the mid-level circulation behind the lower level circulation. They weren't supposed to align until it got closer to Florida. Now I know the ECMWF and GFS aren't showing much of anything, but this is a very complex situation. We were never suppose to see evidence of true formation until tomorrow anyway. Let's take a step back.
2 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
I am not begging for a storm to form. I am just trying to reasonable of what we have. Still a tropical wave till the last thunderstorm fizzles out.
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- terstorm1012
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1314
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
- Location: Millersburg, PA
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
HurriGuy wrote:I feel the need to point out, that even a day or 2 ago, majority of the models did not have any formation till Saturday. All of the models including the HWRF had this severe lag of the mid-level circulation behind the lower level circulation. They weren't supposed to align until it got closer to Florida. Now I know the ECMWF and GFS aren't showing much of anything, but this is a very complex situation. We were never suppose to see evidence of true formation until tomorrow anyway. Let's take a step back.
please keep pointing this out. People are actually seeming to get upset about this storm not forming. So far, I think the models have done well with this disturbance. Tonight and Tomorrow will tell. If nothing comes out of this by tomorrow night, then I say probably won't develop.
1 likes
my posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just my opinion (to which I welcome challenges!) and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- CalmBeforeStorm
- Category 2
- Posts: 600
- Age: 71
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
- Location: Stuart, Florida
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
HurriGuy wrote:I feel the need to point out, that even a day or 2 ago, majority of the models did not have any formation till Saturday. All of the models including the HWRF had this severe lag of the mid-level circulation behind the lower level circulation. They weren't supposed to align until it got closer to Florida. Now I know the ECMWF and GFS aren't showing much of anything, but this is a very complex situation. We were never suppose to see evidence of true formation until tomorrow anyway. Let's take a step back.
Seems to me that the low level vorticity is just about stationary under the blob and the MLC is making progress closing the gap.
3 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
This has been popping quite a few hot towers earlier today and a couple spordic ones just within the last hour or two.
Albeit, surface pressures are high, it will be moving into a developing theta-e ridge to it's NW which will maintain or strengthen convection.
Once the Upper-Level Low to the east grabs a hold of the outflow, it will be very interesting.
Watching the buoys for a sudden drop in pressure.
Albeit, surface pressures are high, it will be moving into a developing theta-e ridge to it's NW which will maintain or strengthen convection.
Once the Upper-Level Low to the east grabs a hold of the outflow, it will be very interesting.
Watching the buoys for a sudden drop in pressure.
4 likes
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
CalmBeforeStorm wrote:HurriGuy wrote:I feel the need to point out, that even a day or 2 ago, majority of the models did not have any formation till Saturday. All of the models including the HWRF had this severe lag of the mid-level circulation behind the lower level circulation. They weren't supposed to align until it got closer to Florida. Now I know the ECMWF and GFS aren't showing much of anything, but this is a very complex situation. We were never suppose to see evidence of true formation until tomorrow anyway. Let's take a step back.
Seems to me that the low level vorticity is just about stationary under the blob and the MLC is making progress closing the gap.
https://twitter.com/StuOstro/status/769260442338332673
Last edited by tarheelprogrammer on Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 4
- Posts: 907
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:21 am
- Location: Ozark, AL
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
IR image of 99L at 1732 vs 1938. Maintaing itself quite well


1 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
terstorm1012 wrote:HurriGuy wrote:I feel the need to point out, that even a day or 2 ago, majority of the models did not have any formation till Saturday. All of the models including the HWRF had this severe lag of the mid-level circulation behind the lower level circulation. They weren't supposed to align until it got closer to Florida. Now I know the ECMWF and GFS aren't showing much of anything, but this is a very complex situation. We were never suppose to see evidence of true formation until tomorrow anyway. Let's take a step back.
please keep pointing this out. People are actually seeming to get upset about this storm not forming. So far, I think the models have done well with this disturbance. Tonight and Tomorrow will tell. If nothing comes out of this by tomorrow night, then I say probably won't develop.
Wow, "models have done well"......
Look back to the Models at the beginning of the week and the beginning of the week (you can see them over there in the Models Forum) and maybe rethink that conclusion.
We were looking at models showing a named system in the Central Bahamas TODAY.
Thus the very high percentages put out by the NHC earlier in the week.
Not their fault that the models have performed poorly on 99L. They are only "models" and a huge input to forecasting.
According to the Models I should be planning putting up my god-awful shutters tomorrow.
Happily it appears all I should get is MAYBE some enhanced rainfall and I seriously doubt I will see even that.
But I'll remain vigilant until the threat (as small as it is) is gone.
1 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests