ATL: HERMINE - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
JaxGator
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:33 pm
Location: Jacksonville Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2841 Postby JaxGator » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:13 pm

Levi Cowan ‏@TropicalTidbits · 1h1 hour ago
99L still has a robust wave signature. SSW winds of 20kt is a healthy sign. Means development still possible later.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CqzZQEXWgAAtIih.jpg
1 likes   
The posts or stuff said are NOT an official forecast. Please look to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.

Floyd-1999, Frances-2004, Jeanne-2004, Fay-2008, Beryl-2012, Debby-2012, Colin-2016, Hermine-2016, Julia-2016, Matthew-2016, Irma-2017, Elsa-2021, Idalia-2023, Debby-2024, Helene-2024.


Go Gators! Go Jags!

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5495
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2842 Postby chaser1 » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:17 pm

Frank2 wrote:I just realized a 99L is also interacting with a ULL between it and Florida - not sure if the ULL is weakening or strengthening:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... imated.gif


Hard to tell but there's no doubt that right now, 99L looks like it could use some viagra if relying on its own convection to push back against that shear
1 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2843 Postby HurriGuy » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:24 pm

Image

Sheer is still greatly receding according to latest sheer tendency map. But as pointed out, I don't know how reliable it is
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2844 Postby HurriGuy » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:24 pm

Image
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2845 Postby SeGaBob » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:26 pm

It looks like the convection is hardly moving west... looks like strong westerly wind shear.
2 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4035
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2846 Postby AutoPenalti » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:27 pm

Starting to disorganize a little bit, those mountains are really hurting it.
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2847 Postby HurriGuy » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:29 pm

Image

Lower convergence hasn't improved, though. Here is the latest.

Image

Here is 3 hours ago
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7188
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2848 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:30 pm

SeGaBob wrote:Storms seem to have waned the last couple of frames...still a lot better than yesterday though.


nighttime is prime time for 99l..lets see
1 likes   

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2849 Postby SeGaBob » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:31 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
SeGaBob wrote:Storms seem to have waned the last couple of frames...still a lot better than yesterday though.


nighttime is prime time for 99l..lets see


Yes I agree
0 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2850 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:34 pm

Storms already falling apart it just cannot keep convection. Maybe things will change but I personally doubt it. Shear will find a way to pop back up on top of the storm in the future. It is a fighter but knowing the GFS and ECMWF keep it weak is a good sign.
1 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2851 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:38 pm

tarheelprogrammer wrote:Storms already falling apart it just cannot keep convection. Maybe things will change but I personally doubt it. Shear will find a way to pop back up on top of the storm in the future. It is a fighter but knowing the GFS and ECMWF keep it weak is a good sign.


on the contrary convection is still refining. besides the coming and going of convection is quite normal at this stage.
3 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2852 Postby HurriGuy » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:42 pm

I feel the need to point out, that even a day or 2 ago, majority of the models did not have any formation till Saturday. All of the models including the HWRF had this severe lag of the mid-level circulation behind the lower level circulation. They weren't supposed to align until it got closer to Florida. Now I know the ECMWF and GFS aren't showing much of anything, but this is a very complex situation. We were never suppose to see evidence of true formation until tomorrow anyway. Let's take a step back.
2 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2853 Postby HurriGuy » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:43 pm

I am not begging for a storm to form. I am just trying to reasonable of what we have. Still a tropical wave till the last thunderstorm fizzles out.
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2854 Postby terstorm1012 » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:45 pm

HurriGuy wrote:I feel the need to point out, that even a day or 2 ago, majority of the models did not have any formation till Saturday. All of the models including the HWRF had this severe lag of the mid-level circulation behind the lower level circulation. They weren't supposed to align until it got closer to Florida. Now I know the ECMWF and GFS aren't showing much of anything, but this is a very complex situation. We were never suppose to see evidence of true formation until tomorrow anyway. Let's take a step back.

please keep pointing this out. People are actually seeming to get upset about this storm not forming. So far, I think the models have done well with this disturbance. Tonight and Tomorrow will tell. If nothing comes out of this by tomorrow night, then I say probably won't develop.
1 likes   
my posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just my opinion (to which I welcome challenges!) and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
CalmBeforeStorm
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 600
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Stuart, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2855 Postby CalmBeforeStorm » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:45 pm

HurriGuy wrote:I feel the need to point out, that even a day or 2 ago, majority of the models did not have any formation till Saturday. All of the models including the HWRF had this severe lag of the mid-level circulation behind the lower level circulation. They weren't supposed to align until it got closer to Florida. Now I know the ECMWF and GFS aren't showing much of anything, but this is a very complex situation. We were never suppose to see evidence of true formation until tomorrow anyway. Let's take a step back.

Seems to me that the low level vorticity is just about stationary under the blob and the MLC is making progress closing the gap.
3 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11509
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2856 Postby GCANE » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:46 pm

This has been popping quite a few hot towers earlier today and a couple spordic ones just within the last hour or two.
Albeit, surface pressures are high, it will be moving into a developing theta-e ridge to it's NW which will maintain or strengthen convection.
Once the Upper-Level Low to the east grabs a hold of the outflow, it will be very interesting.
Watching the buoys for a sudden drop in pressure.
4 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2857 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:53 pm

CalmBeforeStorm wrote:
HurriGuy wrote:I feel the need to point out, that even a day or 2 ago, majority of the models did not have any formation till Saturday. All of the models including the HWRF had this severe lag of the mid-level circulation behind the lower level circulation. They weren't supposed to align until it got closer to Florida. Now I know the ECMWF and GFS aren't showing much of anything, but this is a very complex situation. We were never suppose to see evidence of true formation until tomorrow anyway. Let's take a step back.

Seems to me that the low level vorticity is just about stationary under the blob and the MLC is making progress closing the gap.


 https://twitter.com/StuOstro/status/769260442338332673


Last edited by tarheelprogrammer on Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

bamajammer4eva
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:21 am
Location: Ozark, AL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2858 Postby bamajammer4eva » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:55 pm

IR image of 99L at 1732 vs 1938. Maintaing itself quite well

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2859 Postby fci » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:56 pm

terstorm1012 wrote:
HurriGuy wrote:I feel the need to point out, that even a day or 2 ago, majority of the models did not have any formation till Saturday. All of the models including the HWRF had this severe lag of the mid-level circulation behind the lower level circulation. They weren't supposed to align until it got closer to Florida. Now I know the ECMWF and GFS aren't showing much of anything, but this is a very complex situation. We were never suppose to see evidence of true formation until tomorrow anyway. Let's take a step back.

please keep pointing this out. People are actually seeming to get upset about this storm not forming. So far, I think the models have done well with this disturbance. Tonight and Tomorrow will tell. If nothing comes out of this by tomorrow night, then I say probably won't develop.


Wow, "models have done well"......
Look back to the Models at the beginning of the week and the beginning of the week (you can see them over there in the Models Forum) and maybe rethink that conclusion.
We were looking at models showing a named system in the Central Bahamas TODAY.
Thus the very high percentages put out by the NHC earlier in the week.
Not their fault that the models have performed poorly on 99L. They are only "models" and a huge input to forecasting.
According to the Models I should be planning putting up my god-awful shutters tomorrow.
Happily it appears all I should get is MAYBE some enhanced rainfall and I seriously doubt I will see even that.
But I'll remain vigilant until the threat (as small as it is) is gone.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#2860 Postby Sanibel » Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:57 pm

Yet the vortex is looking spent.
1 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests