ATL: MATTHEW - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#361 Postby gatorcane » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:21 pm

Keep in mind the Euro track is an outlier. Even the JMA has it moving towards Jamaica and that is a pretty strong depiction of this system for the normally conservative JMA. By the way cutoff low has moved out over Easterm CONUS so is a more progressive pattern (second image)

Image

Image
Last edited by gatorcane on Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:26 pm, edited 6 times in total.
1 likes   

User avatar
N2FSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1062
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: Tallahassee, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#362 Postby N2FSU » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:22 pm

islandgirl45 wrote:
toad strangler wrote:12z Euro with another quick hook.

Could you post an image of that?
(In fact, it would be great if everyone commenting on some noteworthy feature of a model would do likewise.) :)


Image
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#363 Postby SFLcane » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:24 pm

:double: ouch not getting bit again. sooo it's now both GFS and euro out to sea. Likely trend even further next few runs.
2 likes   

User avatar
N2FSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1062
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: Tallahassee, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#364 Postby N2FSU » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:27 pm

When the models are still in long range "windshield wiper" mode, I like to try to make a determination in my head when it's hit it's east and west limits, then watch for it to start narrowing the range. I'm going to guess that this 12z Euro run is the far east limit (or close to it) and it starts adjusting back west over the next few days. It may still miss the US, but my gut tells me such a sharp and early northerly turn isn't going to happen.
1 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#365 Postby Emmett_Brown » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:30 pm

The one thing the GFS, Euro and CMC agree on is the formation of a 500 mb cutoff low over the E US by about 90 hours from now, which is in the relatively near future (even Navgem and JMA show the cutoff low). So, the cutoff low is probably going to happen. How long it takes to eject is where all the models and longer range tracks differ.
Last edited by Emmett_Brown on Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#366 Postby blp » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:30 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
psyclone wrote:there's no denying the trend at this point. storms usually find a way to go north. still plenty of time for it to shift back west though.


the trend started before today as i pointed out this morning...some people didnt take that very well...it was like models only can be looked ar once its declared an invest :eek:


Looking at any trend past 7 days is fools gold. By that logic you have had three trends the last three days. Friday the trend was Nicaragua, Saturday it was W.Carribean and today recurve over Hispaniola. I could easily swing back ouside 7 days. Especially this year with they way the models have performed. If the ensembles all start showing what Euro ops run shows then maybe it can be believed. Plenty of time to sort this out.

Remember the Euro dropped development on yesterdays 00z ops run. So the Euro aint what used to be IMO.
Last edited by blp on Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#367 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:35 pm

SFLcane wrote::double: ouch not getting bit again. sooo it's now both GFS and euro out to sea. Likely trend even further next few runs.



I don't think it will go east of Bermuda though, like a couple of folks are thinking. Hopefully Bermuda won't get hit, but I'm thinking it will be a good amount West of Bermuda
0 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3352
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#368 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:44 pm

Anyone remember the 144+ hr runs that took Hermine out to sea? Yea, that didn't verify.

The overall setup is extremely complex. The progression of cut-off lows over the CONUS are notoriously difficult to predict. Just ask anyone during severe weather season over the plains.
1 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#369 Postby USTropics » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:47 pm

Looking at the GFS ensembles from 06z to 12z, not much has changed but a wider spread on the 12z output. Main difference is the operational GFS has gone from being on the western side of the envelope to being on the eastern side now:

12z plots:
Image

06z plots:
Image

ensembles begin to diverge at about 220 hours, you have a quicker group recurving towards the NE with varying distance off the coast of Florida and a slower group that moves more northward:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#370 Postby terstorm1012 » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:52 pm

For those looking to do a comparison with 97L and Hazel, there are upper air analyses for October 1954 at this site: http://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ncepreanal/ I think the front it merged with caused serious flooding in illinois 3 days before Hazel made landfall--you can read a report (with some synoptic maps) here: http://www.isws.illinois.edu/pubdoc/ri/iswsri-27.pdf it's a PDF so give it some time to load.

here's another report too: http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/082 ... 0-0296.pdf (give it some time to load as it is a PDF.)
Hopefully people find this useful and interesting :)
Last edited by terstorm1012 on Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#371 Postby chaser1 » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:57 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:
SFLcane wrote::double: ouch not getting bit again. sooo it's now both GFS and euro out to sea. Likely trend even further next few runs.



I don't think it will go east of Bermuda though, like a couple of folks are thinking. Hopefully Bermuda won't get hit, but I'm thinking it will be a good amount West of Bermuda


97L could go east of Bermuda... OR all the way to Brownsville Texas! I'd have VERY little confidence in any long range model depiction predicated on the evolution or placement of a cut-off low. I'm a huge advocate for following model consistency but I think it's inconceivable to think that we're not going to continue large swings from the models over the next 5 days. Whether implications suggest a "westward cruiser" or an E. Caribbean recurve, don't believe for a moment that any model that this far out will suddenly nail down this systems ultimate track, and never waiver from here on out. This story is very far from being played out
1 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#372 Postby USTropics » Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:01 pm

It's the CMC, but ensembles have shifted westward compared to the 00z run:

12z ensembles run
Image

00z ensembles run
Image

My main point is we have imperfect models trying to resolve very complex atmospheric conditions (like the evolution of a cutoff low some 120+ hours out). Considering model accuracy this year especially, watching the ensembles for now will be more prudent then the operational runs imo.
1 likes   

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#373 Postby otowntiger » Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:07 pm

Climatology and history in general are strongly in favor of an OTS scenario. So without any model evidence that is the odds on favorite. But now that models are apparently backing up climo it seems to me to be an even stronger case. Of course the odds are beaten every day so if anything can happen. We shall see.
I'm no expert just adding my two cents.
0 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#374 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:10 pm

Nobody posting the HWRF?

Here it is from hour 90 to 126:
Image
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#375 Postby otowntiger » Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:10 pm

USTropics wrote:It's the CMC, but ensembles have shifted westward compared to the 00z run:

12z ensembles run
Image

00z ensembles run
Image

My main point is we have imperfect models trying to resolve very complex atmospheric conditions (like the evolution of a cutoff low some 120+ hours out). Considering model accuracy this year especially, watching the ensembles for now will be more prudent then the operational runs imo.
. Has the Euro always been so weak with this? . These images depict a very weak system. Barely a ts or maybe even a depression in that location.
0 likes   

User avatar
setexholmes
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 20
Age: 36
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2016 6:29 am
Location: Port Arthur, Tx

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#376 Postby setexholmes » Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:11 pm

You really can't call anything a trend right now, I've been watching this since it was on the global models page and this thing has shown anything from burying it into SA to a recurve east of Bermuda. I believe that we are still a ways out from knowing what it is going to do. We all need to keep an eye on this from South Texas to Florida.
0 likes   
The comments and opinions I make are borderline crazy and should not be taken too seriously. Please consult NOAA for information.

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#377 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:13 pm

Here's my thoughts, through 120 to 144hrs its seems cut and dry west track, but the ensembles after that seem to diverge into 2 separate groups on the GFS and the Euro ensembles are all over the place as well as the CMC ensembles so basically after 144hrs we have no idea where its going

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#378 Postby blp » Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:28 pm

otowntiger wrote:Climatology and history in general are strongly in favor of an OTS scenario. So without any model evidence that is the odds on favorite. But now that models are apparently backing up climo it seems to me to be an even stronger case. Of course the odds are beaten every day so if anything can happen. We shall see.
I'm no expert just adding my two cents.


If it passes over the ABC islands as progged it would be extremely unlikely to follow the path the Euro suggests of recurve over Hispaniola. I could not find one case on record.

Image
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

BigB0882
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2284
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#379 Postby BigB0882 » Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:28 pm

Can someone with knowledge of teleconnections tell us what this "should" do based on that? What is currently happening in the Pacific or is it too far out to call still?

Also, the HWRF is useless to me until we have a formed storm. Then I give more weight to it. In that gif the HWRF has this running right into a 1021 H. Is that even possible? Wouldn't the H need to be moving out of the way?
0 likes   

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#380 Postby USTropics » Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:32 pm

otowntiger wrote:
USTropics wrote:It's the CMC, but ensembles have shifted westward compared to the 00z run:

12z ensembles run
http://i.imgur.com/gebBC3Y.png

00z ensembles run
http://i.imgur.com/bDR9KT1.png

My main point is we have imperfect models trying to resolve very complex atmospheric conditions (like the evolution of a cutoff low some 120+ hours out). Considering model accuracy this year especially, watching the ensembles for now will be more prudent then the operational runs imo.
. Has the Euro always been so weak with this? . These images depict a very weak system. Barely a ts or maybe even a depression in that location.


Those are the CMC ensemble members, basically each number represents an individual ensemble member's pressure. You won't see the resolution depicting a storm like an operational run because we're talking a totally different caliber of output.
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests