ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Cunxi Huang
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 329
Age: 27
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:17 pm
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3961 Postby Cunxi Huang » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:27 am

TXNT24 KNES 030613
TCSNTL
A. 14L (MATTHEW)
B. 03/0545Z
C. 14.8N
D. 74.8W
E. ONE/GOES-E
F. T6.0/6.0/D0.5/24HRS
G. IR/EIR/SWIR
H. REMARKS...MG EYE EMBEDDED AND SURROUNDED BY W YIELDS A DT OF 6.0. NO
EYE ADJUSTMENTS MADE.
MET=6.0 AND PT=6.0. FT IS BASED ON DT.
I. ADDL POSITIONS
NIL
...KIM


Really? The W doesn't meet the requirement...

Image
0 likes   
06 SuTY SAOMAI | 09 TY LINFA | 10 TY FANAPI | 10 SuTY MEGI | 16 SuTY MERANTI | 19 SuTY LEKIMA | 24 C2 FRANCINE
DO NOT use my posts for life and death decisions. For official information, please refer to products from your RSMC and national weather agency.

User avatar
beoumont
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: East Central Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3962 Postby beoumont » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:28 am

Ptarmigan wrote:
SunnyThoughts wrote:I keep seeing that area of thunderstorm east of Matthew.

I have seen areas of thunderstorms east of hurricanes. I wonder what causes them.

If there was a landfalling hurricane like Matthew, the thunderstorm east of the hurricane would be a second hit. :eek:


This hurricane + blob reminds me of some old images of Hurricane Harley from back in the 1940s:

Image
0 likes   
List of 79 tropical cyclones intercepted by Richard Horodner:
http://www.canebeard.com/page/page/572246.htm

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3963 Postby bob rulz » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:29 am

The more ragged appearance and weaker intensity is just due to an EWRC right?
0 likes   

CW0262
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 33
Age: 63
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Port Saint Lucie ,FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3964 Postby CW0262 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:30 am

"SPACE LIGHTNING" SHOOTS OUT OF HURRICANE MATTHEW: Hurricane Matthew, currently crossing the Carribean, is not a typical storm. It's one of the most powerful hurricanes of recent years and it has sprites dancing along its cloudtops. Sprites are an exotic form of lightning that shoots up toward the edge of space instead of down toward the ground. Visit Spaceweather.com to see beautiful photos of Hurricane Matthew's "space lightning."
3 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3965 Postby ozonepete » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:31 am

:uarrow: Wow. So cool.
1 likes   

User avatar
stormhunter7
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 762
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 3:13 pm
Location: Panama City Beach, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3966 Postby stormhunter7 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:33 am

last VM had open eyewall on SW side...

Product: Air Force Vortex Message (URNT12 KNHC)
Transmitted: 3rd day of the month at 5:01Z
Agency: United States Air Force
Aircraft: Lockheed WC-130J Hercules with reg. number AF97-5303
Storm Number & Year: 14 in 2016
Storm Name: Matthew (flight in the North Atlantic basin)
Mission Number: 15
Observation Number: 25
A. Time of Center Fix: 3rd day of the month at 4:42:50Z
B. Center Fix Coordinates: 14°48'N 74°57'W (14.8N 74.95W)
B. Center Fix Location: 254 statute miles (410 km) to the SSE (151°) from Kingston, Jamaica.
C. Minimum Height at Standard Level: 2,601m (8,533ft) at 700mb
D. Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind Inbound: 70kts (~ 80.6mph)
E. Location of the Estimated Maximum Surface Wind Inbound: 8 nautical miles (9 statute miles) to the SW (223°) of center fix
F. Maximum Flight Level Wind Inbound: From 305° at 92kts (From the NW at ~ 105.9mph)
G. Location of Maximum Flight Level Wind Inbound: 12 nautical miles (14 statute miles) to the SW (224°) of center fix
H. Minimum Sea Level Pressure: 943mb (27.85 inHg)
I. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Outside Eye: 15°C (59°F) at a pressure alt. of 3,049m (10,003ft)
J. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Inside Eye: 16°C (61°F) at a pressure alt. of 3,047m (9,997ft)
K. Dewpoint Temp (collected at same location as temp inside eye): 10°C (50°F)
K. Sea Surface Temp (collected at same location as temp inside eye): Not Available
L. Eye Character: Open in the southwest, SW
M. Eye Shape: Elliptical (oval shaped)
M. Orientation of Major Axis in Elliptical Eye: 160° to 340° (SSE to NNW)
M. Length of Major Axis in Elliptical Eye: 16 nautical miles
M. Length of Minor Axis in Elliptical Eye: 10 nautical miles
N. Fix Determined By: Penetration, Radar, Wind and Pressure
N. Fix Level: 700mb
O. Navigational Fix Accuracy: 0.02 nautical miles
O. Meteorological Accuracy: 1 nautical mile

Remarks Section:
Maximum Flight Level Wind: 110kts (~ 126.6mph) which was observed 10 nautical miles (12 statute miles) to the SE (130°) from the flight level center at 2:26:30Z
Maximum Flight Level Wind Outbound: 109kts (~ 125.4mph) which was observed 6 nautical miles to the NE (35°) from the flight level center at 4:45:00Z
Dropsonde Surface Wind at Center: From 105° at 12kts (From the ESE at 14mph)
Maximum Flight Level Temp: 18°C (64°F) which was observed 7 nautical miles to the SW (221°) from the flight level center
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3967 Postby sma10 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:41 am

Undoubtedly a conversation for another day, but I have a feeling that after Matthew exits stage right next weekend, we'll have some more fun and games the following weekend, this time in the untapped Western Caribbean.
0 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3968 Postby 1900hurricane » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:47 am

Cunxi Huang wrote:
TXNT24 KNES 030613
TCSNTL
A. 14L (MATTHEW)
B. 03/0545Z
C. 14.8N
D. 74.8W
E. ONE/GOES-E
F. T6.0/6.0/D0.5/24HRS
G. IR/EIR/SWIR
H. REMARKS...MG EYE EMBEDDED AND SURROUNDED BY W YIELDS A DT OF 6.0. NO
EYE ADJUSTMENTS MADE.
MET=6.0 AND PT=6.0. FT IS BASED ON DT.
I. ADDL POSITIONS
NIL
...KIM


Really? The W doesn't meet the requirement...

[image removed]

I feel like SAB (and JTWC) have been really lenient with the embedded shade lately. Weird.
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3969 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:48 am

well look we have movement... still way behind models.. but its something.. lol
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3970 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:50 am

its unfortunate that buoy could not keep an accurate recording. it missed damn near everything..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5495
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3971 Postby chaser1 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:52 am

stormhunter7 wrote:based on 2am pkg. they didnt have the new buoy data in time for pkg. lol

Hurricane-force winds extend outward up to 25 miles (35 km) from
the center and tropical-storm-force winds extend outward up to 195
miles (315 km). NOAA data buoy 42058 reported peak sustained winds
of 78 mph (126 km/h) with a gust to 98 mph (158 km/h) during the
past hour.

The minimum central pressure recently reported by an Air Force
Reserve reconnaissance aircraft was 943 mb (27.85 inches). NOAA
buoy 42058 recently reported a pressure of 957 mb (28.25 inches).


Pretty awesome, but i'd hate to be that dude hanging on to that buoy with one hand, while holding a hand held anemometer with the other! :lol: Seriously though, isn't something off with that wind reading? I would have thought well higher sustained AND gusts given the pressure. I mean, that big metal can just went through the eye, right??
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4032
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3972 Postby AutoPenalti » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:53 am

Aric Dunn wrote:well look we have movement... still way behind models.. but its something.. lol

and still rather slow...
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5495
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3973 Postby chaser1 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:54 am

1900hurricane wrote:
Cunxi Huang wrote:
TXNT24 KNES 030613
TCSNTL
A. 14L (MATTHEW)
B. 03/0545Z
C. 14.8N
D. 74.8W
E. ONE/GOES-E
F. T6.0/6.0/D0.5/24HRS
G. IR/EIR/SWIR
H. REMARKS...MG EYE EMBEDDED AND SURROUNDED BY W YIELDS A DT OF 6.0. NO
EYE ADJUSTMENTS MADE.
MET=6.0 AND PT=6.0. FT IS BASED ON DT.
I. ADDL POSITIONS
NIL
...KIM


Really? The W doesn't meet the requirement...

[image removed]

I feel like SAB (and JTWC) have been really lenient with the embedded shade lately. Weird.


They're probably just cutting and pasting, and photoshopping in Matthew's tumor where its Northern eye wall is supposed to be.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5495
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3974 Postby chaser1 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:58 am

AutoPenalti wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:well look we have movement... still way behind models.. but its something.. lol

and still rather slow...


Actually now wobbling east of due north
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3975 Postby ozonepete » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:30 am

Due north now from the looks of it. Matthew is entering phase 2 of its cycle. It's moving northward and enlarging in size as it merges with the convective cluster to its east. From here the track is pretty straightforward until it starts moving out of the Bahamas in 2 or 3 days. Then we have the next worries about whether it rakes the east coast or turns out to sea.
0 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3976 Postby 1900hurricane » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:30 am

Pressure at the buoy dropped a little more the past hour, down to 943.5 mb.
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4002
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3977 Postby AJC3 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:31 am

Aric Dunn wrote:its unfortunate that buoy could not keep an accurate recording. it missed damn near everything..


You'll get a much more accurate eyewall wind reading from a ocean bottom mounted C-MAN such as Frying Pan Shoals than a moored open ocean buoy. The latter will almost *never* give a completely accurate measurement of the peak winds, since it spends half it's time in troughs of 30+ foot waves (see buoy 41010 in Floyd, Irene). Peak sustained winds, and to some degree gusts, will invariably be underdone.
1 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3978 Postby ozonepete » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:32 am

Wonder why you are saying the buoy failed, Aric?
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3979 Postby ozonepete » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:33 am

AJC3 wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:its unfortunate that buoy could not keep an accurate recording. it missed damn near everything..


You'll get a much more accurate eyewall wind reading from a ocean bottom mounted C-MAN such as Frying Pan Shoals than a moored open ocean buoy. The latter will *never* give a completely accurate measurement of the peak winds, since it spends half it's time in troughs of 30+ foot waves (see buoy 41010 in Floyd, Irene). Peak sustained winds, and to some degree gusts, will invariably be underdone.


Ok thanks, Tony. I'm sure that was what caused Aric's complaint.
1 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4002
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3980 Postby AJC3 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:35 am

ozonepete wrote:Wonder why you are saying the buoy failed, Aric?


Did it? I just assumed it went into the eye.
1 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests