ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7359
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4181 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:40 am

0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4182 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:42 am

gatorcane wrote:A lot of folks along the Eastern coast of Florida are probably going to think just like you if Matthew ends up hitting or at least getting close enough to cause hurricane winds - DESPITE the NHC warning in every single discussion they have issued that folks in Florida cannot rule out hurricane impacts, folks here are too accustomed to watching storms and hurricanes past by to the east with minimal impact on the FL east coast. This may just be one of those times, the luck runs out...we shall see.


Huge kudos to the NHC for how they have handled the various possible scenarios, with the inconsistency of the models and complex variables in play. Florida has barely been in the cone, but assuming the NHC needs to shift closer to Florida, it won't come out of the blue (officially).
2 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

User avatar
JaxGator
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:33 pm
Location: Jacksonville Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4183 Postby JaxGator » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:42 am

robbielyn wrote:How does 98L play into this if at all? I see it's supposed to develop with 40-60% chance.


It's still 40-40% but it would be helpful if it intervened.
0 likes   
The posts or stuff said are NOT an official forecast. Please look to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.

Floyd-1999, Frances-2004, Jeanne-2004, Fay-2008, Beryl-2012, Debby-2012, Colin-2016, Hermine-2016, Julia-2016, Matthew-2016, Irma-2017, Elsa-2021, Idalia-2023, Debby-2024, Helene-2024.


Go Gators! Go Jags!

BirdyCin
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:29 am
Location: Dania Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4184 Postby BirdyCin » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:43 am

Link to Bryan Norcross's latest tweet: "Great point from @NHCDirector. Not all #Matthew tracks from global model ensembles shown on TV, possibility of Florida impacts. #misleading."
https://twitter.com/TWCBryan/status/782984058850639873
1 likes   

jdjaguar
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Jacksonville Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4185 Postby jdjaguar » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:43 am

Evil Jeremy wrote:
SFLcane wrote:UKMET into Florida!


That, plus the new GFS, plus the most recent ECMWF (and it's "priority" ensembles) is making me very concerned. Stronger ridge, and we're entering the timeframe when models zero in on a solution.

Toss in the UKMET and I too am very concerned.

I need to decide at what point to drive down to Vero Beach, put up hurricane shutters for mom, grab her and drive back to Jax Beach, grab wife and pets, and head west I10.

stress city.
1 likes   

Raebie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4186 Postby Raebie » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:44 am

SouthFLTropics wrote:FWIW, JoeB tweeted that he thinks the GFS is still too fast. Leads me to believe he thinks there will be a west shift on the Euro in the 3-5 range and an east shift 5 days plus. Of course we all know his bias towards the Euro. Unfortunately, he may be right.


So does "too fast" mean he thinks it's too far west? A slower storm would go farther east?
0 likes   

User avatar
chris_fit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3236
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4187 Postby chris_fit » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:48 am

BirdyCin wrote:Link to Bryan Norcross's latest tweet: "Great point from @NHCDirector. Not all #Matthew tracks from global model ensembles shown on TV, possibility of Florida impacts. #misleading."
https://twitter.com/TWCBryan/status/782984058850639873



Ugh - maybe I'm just stupid but this tweet is misleading, what the hell does it mean? The fact that ensembles are not shown on TV? Or the fact that some mets say there is a FL threat still, and that is misleading?
0 likes   

jdjaguar
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Jacksonville Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4188 Postby jdjaguar » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:48 am

Raebie wrote:
SouthFLTropics wrote:FWIW, JoeB tweeted that he thinks the GFS is still too fast. Leads me to believe he thinks there will be a west shift on the Euro in the 3-5 range and an east shift 5 days plus. Of course we all know his bias towards the Euro. Unfortunately, he may be right.


So does "too fast" mean he thinks it's too far west? A slower storm would go farther east?

the opposite.

unfortunately.
1 likes   

OntarioEggplant
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4189 Postby OntarioEggplant » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:48 am

The NHC needs to seriously consider dumping their current method for creating the cone in favor of one that considers variability and uncertainty in modeling.
3 likes   

FLLurker32
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 245
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 10:31 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4190 Postby FLLurker32 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:49 am

wzrgirl1 wrote:
FLLurker32 wrote:
gatorcane wrote:
A lot of folks along the Eastern coast of Florida are probably going to think just like you if Matthew ends up hitting or at least getting close enough to cause hurricane winds - DESPITE the NHC warning in every single discussion they have issued that folks in Florida cannot rule out hurricane impacts, folks here are too accustomed to watching storms and hurricanes past by to the east with minimal impact on the FL east coast. This may just be one of those times, the luck runs out...we shall see.


Are you in Alachua?


Not sure if you are speaking to me or not but I am in Broward County down south.


I'm sorry, I should have specified I was asking gatorcane because of the user name. I'm in Marion.
0 likes   
Heather

User avatar
sponger
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:26 am
Location: St Augustine

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4191 Postby sponger » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:50 am

BirdyCin wrote:Link to Bryan Norcross's latest tweet: "Great point from @NHCDirector. Not all #Matthew tracks from global model ensembles shown on TV, possibility of Florida impacts. #misleading."
https://twitter.com/TWCBryan/status/782984058850639873


Yep, that was pre GFS run. The warning klaxon is sounding at the NHC.
1 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4192 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:51 am

chris_fit wrote:
BirdyCin wrote:Link to Bryan Norcross's latest tweet: "Great point from @NHCDirector. Not all #Matthew tracks from global model ensembles shown on TV, possibility of Florida impacts. #misleading."
https://twitter.com/TWCBryan/status/782984058850639873



Ugh - maybe I'm just stupid but this tweet is misleading, what the hell does it mean? The fact that ensembles are not shown on TV? Or the fact that some mets say there is a FL threat still, and that is misleading?


Ensembles aren't shown, and the ensembles indicate more of a Florida thread than the operationals. Although that is changing with the 12z operationals shifting towards Florida.
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4193 Postby SeGaBob » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:52 am

I'm not really concerned yet...interesting nonetheless.
I jinxed us by saying east of Bermuda. :)
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5317
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4194 Postby Nimbus » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:52 am

Slughitter3 wrote:
tolakram wrote:UKM quick plot

Image

Tool is here: http://www.darrinward.com/lat-long/?id=2299955



That last point is literally in the middle of my County... I'm not a fan of that one.


This house won't be there after the storm..

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4195 Postby terstorm1012 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:52 am

OntarioEggplant wrote:The NHC needs to seriously consider dumping their current method for creating the cone in favor of one that considers variability and uncertainty in modeling.


that's what it does.
1 likes   

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4196 Postby Michele B » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:53 am

jdjaguar wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:
SFLcane wrote:UKMET into Florida!


That, plus the new GFS, plus the most recent ECMWF (and it's "priority" ensembles) is making me very concerned. Stronger ridge, and we're entering the timeframe when models zero in on a solution.

Toss in the UKMET and I too am very concerned.

I need to decide at what point to drive down to Vero Beach, put up hurricane shutters for mom, grab her and drive back to Jax Beach, grab wife and pets, and head west I10.

stress city.


Good job watching out for your mom, jd!

I would say you've still got at least 24 hours or more. Maybe more solid tracking showing by then.
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

User avatar
sponger
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:26 am
Location: St Augustine

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4197 Postby sponger » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:54 am

terstorm1012 wrote:
OntarioEggplant wrote:The NHC needs to seriously consider dumping their current method for creating the cone in favor of one that considers variability and uncertainty in modeling.


that's what it does.


I agree.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23692
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4198 Postby gatorcane » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:54 am

Wouldn't be surprised if we get some more shifts west. The NAVGEM which has always showed a recurve well east of Florida is now showing landfall of a significant hurricane into SE Florida on the 12Z. I knew something was up with this quick recurve idea when the NAVGEM and CMC models were forecasting it way in advance. Those models usually don't verify far out.
Last edited by gatorcane on Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4199 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:54 am

OntarioEggplant wrote:The NHC needs to seriously consider dumping their current method for creating the cone in favor of one that considers variability and uncertainty in modeling.


The current method isn't broken. It's been on point so far. The variability and uncertainty is already accounted for. Additionally, NHC has other products that provide more information than the cone. For example, while Florida is only incredibly barely in the cone, much of the FL East coast has a 20%-40% chance of TS winds. This method of delivering information works.
3 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4200 Postby Michele B » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:55 am

Raebie wrote:
SouthFLTropics wrote:FWIW, JoeB tweeted that he thinks the GFS is still too fast. Leads me to believe he thinks there will be a west shift on the Euro in the 3-5 range and an east shift 5 days plus. Of course we all know his bias towards the Euro. Unfortunately, he may be right.


So does "too fast" mean he thinks it's too far west? A slower storm would go farther east?


So what does mean? What do you think he's thinking?

Landfall in Vero? Further south? Or north?
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests