ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4201 Postby RL3AO » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:56 am

OntarioEggplant wrote:The NHC needs to seriously consider dumping their current method for creating the cone in favor of one that considers variability and uncertainty in modeling.


They're working on it.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7188
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4202 Postby jlauderdal » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:57 am

OntarioEggplant wrote:The NHC needs to seriously consider dumping their current method for creating the cone in favor of one that considers variability and uncertainty in modeling.
so its up to the forecaster to draw the cone? the cone will move as the track shifts accordingly, i like the cone as there is no randomness or opinion...if the private forecasters including media want to step out and make a forecast than they can..look, there is plenty of time to get ready in florida, everybody is warned before june 1 in hurricane areas to have supplies and a plan..if you dont then you should
2 likes   

TJRE
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2013 9:04 am
Location: New Jersey

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4203 Postby TJRE » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:58 am

Goes 16:37 UTC

Image

http://goes.gsfc.nasa.gov/

NASTY
Last edited by TJRE on Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

ThetaE
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 244
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:50 pm
Location: Boston

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4204 Postby ThetaE » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:58 am



Yup! He's not spitting out (as many) outflow boundaries on the west side anymore (and actually has a western feeder band!), his eye is clearing out, and his once-tumorous eastern blob has been subdued to marginally abnormal thunderstorms. All these point to signs of and intensification, IMO.
1 likes   
I'm a busy grad student, not a professional forecaster. Please refer to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts.

User avatar
otterlyspicey
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 55
Age: 37
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2015 2:51 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4205 Postby otterlyspicey » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:58 am

Michele B wrote:
Raebie wrote:
SouthFLTropics wrote:FWIW, JoeB tweeted that he thinks the GFS is still too fast. Leads me to believe he thinks there will be a west shift on the Euro in the 3-5 range and an east shift 5 days plus. Of course we all know his bias towards the Euro. Unfortunately, he may be right.


So does "too fast" mean he thinks it's too far west? A slower storm would go farther east?


So what does mean? What do you think he's thinking?

Landfall in Vero? Further south? Or north?


In theory further west towards Florida in the short term, then more sharply and quickly shoved further east away from the Carolinas long term, I believe.
0 likes   
HURRICANE FLOYD HURRICANE IRENE HURRICANE SANDY

jdjaguar
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Jacksonville Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4206 Postby jdjaguar » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:58 am

Michele B wrote:
jdjaguar wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:
That, plus the new GFS, plus the most recent ECMWF (and it's "priority" ensembles) is making me very concerned. Stronger ridge, and we're entering the timeframe when models zero in on a solution.

Toss in the UKMET and I too am very concerned.

I need to decide at what point to drive down to Vero Beach, put up hurricane shutters for mom, grab her and drive back to Jax Beach, grab wife and pets, and head west I10.

stress city.


Good job watching out for your mom, jd!

I would say you've still got at least 24 hours or more. Maybe more solid tracking showing by then.

thanks.

she evacuated twice back in 2004 (Jeanne/Frances). But back then JAX was not in the crosshairs as well (and we lived well inland at the time)

I agree on the timeline for decision-making, just is important to be a step ahead of the crowd.

regards.
1 likes   

User avatar
birddogsc
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:09 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4207 Postby birddogsc » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:59 am

Landfall near Myrtle Beach as depicted in the GFS is a nightmare scenario for SC. Getting traffic out from there is not easy, and only one road supports lane reversal if needed.
0 likes   

Wakeknight
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 7:37 am
Location: Nokomis, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4208 Postby Wakeknight » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:59 am

I flew out of Sarasota this afternoon and there was a Navy cargo plane that had been relocated from Charleston parked on the tarmac. That may give some indication of where the military believes this storm is heading.
0 likes   

Raebie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4209 Postby Raebie » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:59 am

Don't know, but our local met is saying he's not buying the GFS because it's too fast. And if I'm reading his take right, he thinks the track is too far west. Trying to get clarification.
0 likes   

User avatar
birddogsc
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:09 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4210 Postby birddogsc » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:01 pm

Raebie wrote:Don't know, but our local met is saying he's not buying the GFS because it's too fast. And if I'm reading his take right, he thinks the track is too far west. Trying to get clarification.


Local WX folks here are saying the same. The state is taking it seriously though.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7188
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4211 Postby jlauderdal » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:01 pm

Wakeknight wrote:I flew out of Sarasota this afternoon and there was a Navy cargo plane that had been relocated from Charleston parked on the tarmac. That may give some indication of where the military believes this storm is heading.
the navy needs to take alook at the navgem
0 likes   

ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4212 Postby ronyan » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:01 pm

Raebie wrote:Don't know, but our local met is saying he's not buying the GFS because it's too fast. And if I'm reading his take right, he thinks the track is too far west. Trying to get clarification.

It has been consistently showing a similar speed in the last several runs.
0 likes   

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4213 Postby Michele B » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:02 pm

jdjaguar wrote:
Michele B wrote:
jdjaguar wrote:Toss in the UKMET and I too am very concerned.

I need to decide at what point to drive down to Vero Beach, put up hurricane shutters for mom, grab her and drive back to Jax Beach, grab wife and pets, and head west I10.

stress city.


Good job watching out for your mom, jd!

I would say you've still got at least 24 hours or more. Maybe more solid tracking showing by then.

thanks.

she evacuated twice back in 2004 (Jeanne/Frances). But back then JAX was not in the crosshairs as well (and we lived well inland at the time)

I agree on the timeline for decision-making, just is important to be a step ahead of the crowd.

regards.


Oh, for sure that!

Stepson once evacuated Broward cause his wife didn't want to go through a storm forecast for their area. They boarded their place up and hopped on I-95 and took 12 hours to get across FL line into GA. LOTS of others, bumper to bumper and NO GAS ANYWHERE ALONG THE WAY!
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

dukeblue219
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 535
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4214 Postby dukeblue219 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:03 pm

birddogsc wrote:Landfall near Myrtle Beach as depicted in the GFS is a nightmare scenario for SC. Getting traffic out from there is not easy, and only one road supports lane reversal if needed.


On the plus side, this is a slow mover that should allow decent advance-notice (at least for long-lead preparations), and it's October, not August, so the beach-going crowds should be smaller.
0 likes   

Raebie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4215 Postby Raebie » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:03 pm

ronyan wrote:
Raebie wrote:Don't know, but our local met is saying he's not buying the GFS because it's too fast. And if I'm reading his take right, he thinks the track is too far west. Trying to get clarification.

It has been consistently showing a similar speed in the last several runs.


I think he means in comparison to the Euro.
0 likes   

HurricaneEric
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 146
Age: 30
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 11:06 am
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4216 Postby HurricaneEric » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:03 pm

Raebie wrote:Don't know, but our local met is saying he's not buying the GFS because it's too fast. And if I'm reading his take right, he thinks the track is too far west. Trying to get clarification.


Slower would mean more west in days 3-5 towards Florida.
0 likes   
Irene '99, Katrina '05, Wilma '05, Irma '17 (storms I remember my area getting hurricane force winds/gusts).

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and shouldn't be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the experts.

Raebie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4217 Postby Raebie » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:04 pm

HurricaneEric wrote:
Raebie wrote:Don't know, but our local met is saying he's not buying the GFS because it's too fast. And if I'm reading his take right, he thinks the track is too far west. Trying to get clarification.


Slower would mean more west in days 3-5 towards Florida.


And then east away from the Carolina coastline?
1 likes   

ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4218 Postby ronyan » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:04 pm

From what I've seen there are conflicting opinions on whether slower = OTS.
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4769
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4219 Postby psyclone » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:05 pm

Long a promoter of looking at NHC probabilities (ideally trends when the storm is still far away) is the best way to gauge a threat. For Florida folks that threat is definitely going up... Longer term the Carolinas..yikes.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7188
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4220 Postby jlauderdal » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:05 pm

Raebie wrote:Don't know, but our local met is saying he's not buying the GFS because it's too fast. And if I'm reading his take right, he thinks the track is too far west. Trying to get clarification.
so the tv met is only buying the euro..fair enough but you know better to not too hang one model at this point..this is the biggest euro run in a very long time for the united states..less than an hour to go...a major hurricane with a shot to hit the usa in heavily populated areas..havent seen this in a very long time
1 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests