ATL: MATTHEW - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5301 Postby AutoPenalti » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:02 pm

gatorcane wrote:12Z NAVGEM loop from hour 0 to 120. This is a model that has been basically right along the NHC track or a little to the east with this system until now:
Image

Look at that ridge...builds in much like how it was forecasted long before.
Last edited by AutoPenalti on Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5314
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5302 Postby Nimbus » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:03 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
gatorcane wrote:SFWMD 18Z:

Image



yeah, look at all the gfs members now over florida. 18z gfs is likely to come follow suit.


Late getting reservations at the Holiday Inn?
Hopefully it all happens on the right.
0 likes   

adam0983

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5303 Postby adam0983 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:05 pm

My shutters are on standby right now with that track. Looks like an august weather pattern right now strong ridge has been there all summer here in south Florida been very dry.
0 likes   

fox13weather
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:49 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5304 Postby fox13weather » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:07 pm

AutoPenalti wrote:
gatorcane wrote:12Z NAVGEM loop from hour 0 to 120. This is a model that has been basically right along the NHC track or a little to the east with this system until now:
Image

Look at that ridge...builds in much like how it was forecasted long before.



That would be known as an "outlier" Everyone wants to find the model that will cause the most havoc and then run with it. In reality, the chance of it verifying is slim.
5 likes   

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5305 Postby stormlover2013 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:10 pm

yeah more than likely won't happen but never say never with how up and down these models have changed
0 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5306 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:10 pm

fox13weather wrote:
AutoPenalti wrote:
gatorcane wrote:12Z NAVGEM loop from hour 0 to 120. This is a model that has been basically right along the NHC track or a little to the east with this system until now:
Image

Look at that ridge...builds in much like how it was forecasted long before.



That would be known as an "outlier" Everyone wants to find the model that will cause the most havoc and then run with it. In reality, the chance of it verifying is slim.


You think the models are right about a possible NC strike? Or SC strike?
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
BensonTCwatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1046
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Southport NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5307 Postby BensonTCwatcher » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:10 pm

NHC would likely have to shift west on the official track as it's really on the east of the guidance. GFS and ECMWF are singing from the same page in the songbook pretty much. Still differences in the synoptic set up for each and they could both be wrong. Cant tell you how many storms are set for a Myrtle Beach landfall that end up turning east, just grazing the coast, or in the end or weakening drastically. I am now hoping for any/all of the above vs what is shaping up to real trouble. The ridging at 120-144 hours is coming into pretty good agreement.

Of course Haiti will be a disaster and Cuba will have major impacts no matter what. :(
1 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5308 Postby SouthDadeFish » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:13 pm

The NAVGEM was one of the worst performing models last season and for previous years as well. I would not consider it to be a reliable model. It is definitely an outlier for now.
6 likes   

User avatar
sponger
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:26 am
Location: St Augustine

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5309 Postby sponger » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:17 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:The NAVGEM was one of the worst performing models last season and for previous years as well. I would not consider it to be a reliable model. It is definitely an outlier for now.


Like the GFDL, sure fun to watch!
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

miamijaaz
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 3:40 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5310 Postby miamijaaz » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:19 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:The NAVGEM was one of the worst performing models last season and for previous years as well. I would not consider it to be a reliable model. It is definitely an outlier for now.


Why does it always seem like the worst performing models forecast the worst possible scenarios? :D
0 likes   

OntarioEggplant
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5311 Postby OntarioEggplant » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:23 pm

miamijaaz wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:The NAVGEM was one of the worst performing models last season and for previous years as well. I would not consider it to be a reliable model. It is definitely an outlier for now.


Why does it always seem like the worst performing models forecast the worst possible scenarios? :D


Because they have less consistency, they're more likely to hit such spots than a model that is very consistent.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23692
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5312 Postby gatorcane » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:25 pm

fox13weather wrote:
AutoPenalti wrote:
gatorcane wrote:12Z NAVGEM loop from hour 0 to 120. This is a model that has been basically right along the NHC track or a little to the east with this system until now:
https://s12.postimg.org/bc3ckwhdp/100f8 ... ce0530.gif

Look at that ridge...builds in much like how it was forecasted long before.



That would be known as an "outlier" Everyone wants to find the model that will cause the most havoc and then run with it. In reality, the chance of it verifying is slim.


Yes outlier as far as far as getting into the Eastern Gulf and west coast of Florida but there is cluster of 00Z ECMWF ensembles that have Matthew coming ashore the SE Florida coastline from as far south as the middle keys all the way up through the Treasure coast along the east coast of Florida.

Very curious what the 12Z ECMWF ensembles show, should be out in the next hour.
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5313 Postby meriland23 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:26 pm

I have been rather busy the past few days so my upkeep on the storm has been spotty. Can someone fill me in on the current trajectory changes, specifically the changes in the ridge and trough? Seems to wax wane and depend on those.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4825
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5314 Postby ronjon » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:27 pm

NAVGEM as an individual model performer is terrible - however, the fact that the ridge is stronger in observed height rises than what was placed in the GFS model argues that perhaps further westward shifts may happen in the models. UKMET has the strongest ridging now and is a more reliable model so we'll see the model trends over the next few cycles.
0 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5315 Postby stormreader » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:32 pm

ronjon wrote:NAVGEM as an individual model performer is terrible - however, the fact that the ridge is stronger in observed height rises than what was placed in the GFS model argues that perhaps further westward shifts may happen in the models. UKMET has the strongest ridging now and is a more reliable model so we'll see the model trends over the next few cycles.


Would definitely argue for further shifts west. You have to look how far west things have come just in the last 36 hours or so. With the ridging, the possibility of any shifts back east seem remote. But further west shifts are much more likely.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5316 Postby Steve » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:35 pm

I don't think the GFS will quite verify, but if it does, it's a multi-billion dollar damage storm. It just sort of runs the outline of on or near the US Coast from South Carolina to Maine. That's not too often (I guess Donna was one of those back before I was born) that happens. The ridging, I don't have a problem with, and it's a good thing that this will probably head north and miss the "third" ridge which would likely block it further. We'll get enough out of this to last a while.
0 likes   

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2125
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Williamsburg, VA / Bermuda

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5317 Postby Kazmit » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:36 pm

These models show potentially the worst possible track that Matt could take. :eek: I'm expecting a west shift for 5pm.

Image
1 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

TheHook210
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2016 3:13 pm
Location: Merritt Island, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5318 Postby TheHook210 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:37 pm

stormreader wrote:
ronjon wrote:NAVGEM as an individual model performer is terrible - however, the fact that the ridge is stronger in observed height rises than what was placed in the GFS model argues that perhaps further westward shifts may happen in the models. UKMET has the strongest ridging now and is a more reliable model so we'll see the model trends over the next few cycles.


Would definitely argue for further shifts west. You have to look how far west things have come just in the last 36 hours or so. With the ridging, the possibility of any shifts back east seem remote. But further west shifts are much more likely.


Not sure if I can post this in the model thread but it seems due to the west shifts, the governer of FL has just declared a state of emergency.
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4825
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5319 Postby ronjon » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:38 pm

From Dr Jeff Masters Blog:

A significant westward shift in computer model guidance on Hurricane Matthew has occurred, and this could have big implications for the hurricane’s potential impact on the U.S. East Coast. The main reason appears to be stronger ridging south of 98L and north of Matthew than earlier predicted, which may help to nudge Matthew far enough west for major impacts along the Southeast U.S. coast. Last night’s 50 ensemble runs from the 00Z Monday European model included a number of tracks making landfall along the U.S. East Coast. Most concerning is that, for the first time in Matthew’s life, all four members of the Euro “high-probability” cluster--the members that most closely match the operational run--depict Matthew making landfall on Florida’s East Coast. (The 12Z Monday run of the NAM model also depicts the stronger ridge and suggests a Florida landfall, but the NAM is not designed to handle tropical cyclones and should be avoided for hurricane prediction, unless perhaps you’re Bart Simpson.)

Lending further credence to the westward shift are the latest 12Z Monday operational runs of our other two top track models, the GFS and UKMET. The 12Z UKMET brings Matthew into the East Coast of Florida, while the GFS brings Matthew considerably closer to the Florida coast than earlier runs, with a projected landfall in northern South Carolina this weekend (see Figure 4 below) and a second landfall on Cape Cod less than 36 hours later. The several previous operational GFS runs had suggested that a Southeast landfall would be limited to the NC Outer Banks at most. Likewise, the 12Z Monday GFS ensembles (GEFS) now include a majority of runs making landfall somewhere between Florida and North Carolina, a major shift west from previous GFS ensembles. In addition, the 12Z Monday run of the HWRF model is tracking about 1 degree (roughly 60 miles) west of its previous two runs, now showing a potential landfall in eastern North Carolina by late Friday.

https://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=3460
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5320 Postby terstorm1012 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:40 pm

meriland23 wrote:I have been rather busy the past few days so my upkeep on the storm has been spotty. Can someone fill me in on the current trajectory changes, specifically the changes in the ridge and trough? Seems to wax wane and depend on those.


closer to the coast, still as slow, we've got all week to watch and worry. anxiously awaiting new model runs that incorporate the 4-times-a-day balloon releases and gulfstream recon data.
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests