ATL: MATTHEW - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5541 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:43 pm

boulderrr wrote:
JaxGator wrote:
Look like another west shift doesn't it?


Looks like a western shift in the short to medium term and an eastward shift in the long term. Beyond North Carolina, most of the models have shifted eastward suggesting a track further from the Northeast. Look how far east the consensus line shifted beyond 120 hours between 18Z and 00Z. I'm assuming this is due to Matthew's slower expected motion and the eastward progression of the storm that will be bringing me snow here in Colorado Wednesday night into Thursday.


Welcome to the forum!
1 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5542 Postby meriland23 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:52 pm

is the mb intensity level or similar to the previous runs of these models or has it significantly boosted or reduced once approaching the US?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5543 Postby stormlover2013 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:54 pm

Models will keep trending west till wed!!! Gut feeling but the ingridents is coming together
0 likes   

User avatar
SEASON_CANCELED
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 887
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:17 am
Location: 8 Bit Charlie Sheen

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5544 Postby SEASON_CANCELED » Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:59 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:Models will keep trending west till wed!!! Gut feeling but the ingridents is coming together



The trend is not your friend
0 likes   
i am a big stupid ugly moron with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt stinks and i like to kiss my own butt

boulderrr
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:30 am
Location: Nederland, Colorado - 8,500'

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5545 Postby boulderrr » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:01 pm

Evil Jeremy wrote:
boulderrr wrote:
JaxGator wrote:
Look like another west shift doesn't it?


Looks like a western shift in the short to medium term and an eastward shift in the long term. Beyond North Carolina, most of the models have shifted eastward suggesting a track further from the Northeast. Look how far east the consensus line shifted beyond 120 hours between 18Z and 00Z. I'm assuming this is due to Matthew's slower expected motion and the eastward progression of the storm that will be bringing me snow here in Colorado Wednesday night into Thursday.


Welcome to the forum!


Thanks! Been here for a while lurking. Been around for many many years on all the old forums (American Wx, Eastern Wx, Wright Weather, and others I can't remember). Will try to contribute more when I have anything useful to say. (And sorry for going off-topic in here!)

Here is a comparison of the 18Z and 00Z TVCN line. Maps not quite matched in positioning, but you can clearly see the further eastward track beyond NC:
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5546 Postby Steve » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:02 pm

Looks like the low crossing Great Lakes eventually kicks out some of the lower levels and maybe part of it phases with the low in eastern Canada which is why it hooks out. Impacts are definitely back on the table for the US and potentially major. I'd been busy all weekend, so I've only been casually following. Can't say whether we get a parallel track to Florida or a landfall or whether or not South or North Carolina see a landfall rather than a brush by. There will be hundreds of millions of dollars in damage regardlessly, but with Matthew specifically having that intense inner core, it's a small radius of catastrophic potential. 30 miles offshore could be a big deal.

Meanwhile, Haiti. I hate that they always seem to get the short end of the stick. Between earthquakes, hurricanes, deforestation, AIDS, poverty, etc., they seem to be more susceptible to disaster than anyone else in our hemisphere. Prayers and wishes out mes Amis d'Haiti.
5 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5547 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:04 pm

Image
JMA landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2811
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5548 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:06 pm

18z supermodel consensus almost looks like a Donna (1960) type track, minus the Florida part.
1 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5549 Postby Ken711 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:08 pm

Steve wrote:Looks like the low crossing Great Lakes eventually kicks out some of the lower levels and maybe part of it phases with the low in eastern Canada which is why it hooks out. Impacts are definitely back on the table for the US and potentially major. I'd been busy all weekend, so I've only been casually following. Can't say whether we get a parallel track to Florida or a landfall or whether or not South or North Carolina see a landfall rather than a brush by. There will be hundreds of millions of dollars in damage regardlessly, but with Matthew specifically having that intense inner core, it's a small radius of catastrophic potential. 30 miles offshore could be a big deal.

Meanwhile, Haiti. I hate that they always seem to get the short end of the stick. Between earthquakes, hurricanes, deforestation, AIDS, poverty, etc., they seem to be more susceptible to disaster than anyone else in our hemisphere. Prayers and wishes out mes Amis d'Haiti.


Any thoughts on timing and other factors that might weaken the ridge?
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5550 Postby Steve » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:22 pm

Unfortunately not. I haven't been following closely enough. Looks like the 00z models shown in the sfwmd hurricane plots show slightly less of a threat from maybe DC and north of there, but I wouldn't rule out some bad effects for Virginia if Matthew landfalls in SC or NC. So maybe the next low kicks it out Saturday-ish? I will say that Megi telegraphed the threat afterall. I thought the ridge would be stronger going back over a week ago, and I brought that up probably 10 times through last weekend.

Also and sorry about off topic. But if we get a western Caribbean system from energy piling up late next week, I'd guess the threat to Florida could be higher. We will see on that.
2 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5551 Postby WeatherEmperor » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:39 pm

I dont wanna start anything...but the 0z NAM is coming in just a bit east from before. Mabye a sign the others will shiftca bit east too?

Image


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
0 likes   

User avatar
AdamFirst
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2491
Age: 36
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:54 am
Location: Port Saint Lucie, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5552 Postby AdamFirst » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:44 pm

NAM's track is more in line with the 18z GFS...for what it's worth

that's still putting the storm dangerously close to the coast
1 likes   
Dolphins Marlins Canes Golden Panthers HEAT
Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Wilma 2005 - Fay 2008 - Isaac 2012 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Dorian 2019 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022 - Milton 2024

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5553 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:49 pm

WeatherEmperor wrote:I dont wanna start anything...but the 0z NAM is coming in just a bit east from before. Mabye a sign the others will shiftca bit east too?

Image


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk



dont look at track. the ridging is nearly identical. so disregard the NAM track and maintain ridging.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5554 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:55 pm

and actually the ridging is stronger in the SE bahamas than the 18z.. thats why we dont use NAM for track only synoptics.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5555 Postby AutoPenalti » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:58 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:and actually the ridging is stronger in the SE bahamas than the 18z.. thats why we dont use NAM for track only synoptics.

Yeah, NAM is reliable on everything BUT cyclone positioning.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
SeminoleWind
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 359
Age: 50
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 8:37 pm
Location: Lake County Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5556 Postby SeminoleWind » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:00 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
WeatherEmperor wrote:I dont wanna start anything...but the 0z NAM is coming in just a bit east from before. Mabye a sign the others will shiftca bit east too?

Image


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk



dont look at track. the ridging is nearly identical. so disregard the NAM track and maintain ridging.


I have always been under the Assumption that the NAM is not usually what you would look at as far as track and strength but more synoptics ??
0 likes   
This post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5557 Postby northjaxpro » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:01 pm

Matthew even closer to Florida on the 11 p.m. advisory. Another shift west.
1 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5558 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:02 pm

SeminoleWind wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
WeatherEmperor wrote:I dont wanna start anything...but the 0z NAM is coming in just a bit east from before. Mabye a sign the others will shiftca bit east too?

Image


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk



dont look at track. the ridging is nearly identical. so disregard the NAM track and maintain ridging.


I have always been under the Assumption that the NAM is not usually what you would look at as far as track and strength but more synoptics ??

Correct. If anything this extra ridging could possibly mean the opposite of what Seminole said and cause further west tracks.
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5559 Postby meriland23 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:05 pm

NHC predicts significant shear enough to rapidly weaken it to a cat 2 in 96 hours. How is it assumed to weaken that tremendously, when all of the models show a monster 4-5 near the coast of FL/SC, etc? And continuously?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
WPBWeather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 535
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:33 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#5560 Postby WPBWeather » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:06 pm

meriland23 wrote:NHC predicts significant shear enough to rapidly weaken it to a cat 2 in 96 hours. How is it assumed to weaken that tremendously, when all of the models show a monster 4-5 near the coast of FL/SC, etc? And continuously?


Didn't see that in the discussion. Where did you see it?
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests