ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4830
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5781 Postby ronjon » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:03 pm

frankly shocked the NHC didn't shift the track further west.
1 likes   

User avatar
Happy Pelican
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 119
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 11:12 pm
Location: Pelican Island, Jersey Shore

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5782 Postby Happy Pelican » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:03 pm

I know all eyes are on Florida but do you think the threat to NY/Jersey Shore is somewhat off the table?
1 likes   

yzerfan
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 588
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:09 pm
Location: Niceville, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5783 Postby yzerfan » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:03 pm

psyclone wrote:
SeGaBob wrote:State of emergency in this part of GA...still not convinced though.


A state of emergency seems to be widely misinterpreted. It doesn't mean a catastrophe is imminent. it is the state activating those responsible for responding in the event something bad happens...think of it as precautionary "get ready" mode. seems to be prudent for the Carolinas southward to FL at this point. I'm pretty sure even Colin triggered a state of emergency in Florida back in June and we know what a paltry excuse of a system that was..


In Florida, a lot of legal stuff ties into a state of emergency declaration- the anti-price gouging laws are activated, lots of rules are waived in state and local government that allow the entities to move quicker and spend money as needed without having to go up the chain of command all the way to Tallahassee, etc. There are years when the state spends 2-3 months under a state of emergency over wildfire concerns even when what's actually burning at any given time is of limited acreage.
1 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7189
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5784 Postby jlauderdal » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:04 pm

Sanibel wrote:Just spoke to a relative 2 miles from the shore in Charleston. They are under mandatory evacuation.
that seems way pre mature
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5785 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:05 pm

xironman wrote:
Soonercane wrote:Anyone know why they are keeping this at 125 knots? It hasn't been that strong in at least 12 hours.

The last VDM

"Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind Inbound: 117kts (~ 134.6mph)"

And it was probably weaker then


no multiple dropsondes measured 127kts to 129kts after it crossed hati.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5786 Postby KWT » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:05 pm

Looking at the radar Haiti did very little to the core of Matthew. Once clear of land I can only imagine its going to get a fair bit stronger again based on the great upper pattern aloft.

Could be our first major landfall in a long time...im betting the effects wont be much different even if it does just stay offshore.

Think given the days trend, a Florida landfall looking very probable now.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7189
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5787 Postby jlauderdal » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:05 pm

ronjon wrote:frankly shocked the NHC didn't shift the track further west.

at what time period you talking..they pushed it west at day 2...they even said so in the disco
2 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7189
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5788 Postby jlauderdal » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:06 pm

EquusStorm wrote:Eye still impressive on Guantanamo Bay radar...

Image
that is a chasers dream right there..doesnt get much better than that
0 likes   

User avatar
ObsessedMiami
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 431
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: West Kendall, Fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5789 Postby ObsessedMiami » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:07 pm

ronjon wrote:frankly shocked the NHC didn't shift the track further west.

Tropical Storm wind probabilities have risen for Metro Miami to 50-60%
0 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5790 Postby stormreader » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:07 pm

gatorcane wrote:The 12Z Euro seems to lie along the eastern side of the NHC track up until Florida. I would think a west shift in the track up until Florida is coming in the 5pmEST advisory.

And even with that I'm not totally sold that this is the last of the west shifts. I would watch during the next 24 hours for further west shift for landfall in extreme S Fl. Miami down to keys seems most likely. Keys seems a stretch, but I called for landfall there consistently beginning about a week ago, I guess.
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4830
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5791 Postby ronjon » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:09 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
ronjon wrote:frankly shocked the NHC didn't shift the track further west.

at what time period you talking..they pushed it west at day 2...they even said so in the disco


I would have averaged the track between the GFS and ECM.
1 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4769
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5792 Postby psyclone » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:09 pm

ronjon wrote:frankly shocked the NHC didn't shift the track further west.


they've got time to make their baby steps as needed. Look at those wind probs now...Orlando with a 70% chance of ts winds IIRC....As it stands now central Florida east of US 27 is going to see some decent wind from this...and the coast looks like hammer time. Look at Palm Beach's odds.... :eek: Time to channel understandable anxiety into constructive preps..
0 likes   

stephen23
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:57 pm
Location: North Fort Worth

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5793 Postby stephen23 » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:10 pm

Seems when speeding up radar loop that there has been some good northwest jogs every now and then over past few hours. Is it already starting to make it's turn a little bit? That would verify what some were questioning with the Euro
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5794 Postby SeGaBob » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:10 pm

Looks like it shifted east up here.
0 likes   

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5795 Postby xironman » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:11 pm

w
Aric Dunn wrote:
xironman wrote:
Soonercane wrote:Anyone know why they are keeping this at 125 knots? It hasn't been that strong in at least 12 hours.

The last VDM

"Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind Inbound: 117kts (~ 134.6mph)"

And it was probably weaker then


no multiple dropsondes measured 127kts to 129kts after it crossed hati.

Well, #1 is that I was backing it up that 125 knots was ok because who knows if the recon flight hit the highest wind spots. #2. You don't use dropsondes for sustained wind speeds since they only capture momentary winds, AFM corrected me on that one.
0 likes   

miamijaaz
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 3:40 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5796 Postby miamijaaz » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:12 pm

ronjon wrote:frankly shocked the NHC didn't shift the track further west.


I suspect they want to see the next set of model runs and if the west trend continues, they can always extend the watch southward at 11:00 pm.
0 likes   

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5797 Postby SunnyThoughts » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:13 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
Sanibel wrote:Just spoke to a relative 2 miles from the shore in Charleston. They are under mandatory evacuation.
that seems way pre mature


I don't know if I would say its premature or not, all these decisions by emergency management have to be made asap. There are potentially 4 states that will be impacted (not even considering the NE should that happen) that can't wait until they know EXACTLY where its going to come ashore, if it does at all, to start evacuating people. Fla, Ga, Sc and NC...the coastal areas, could alL be raked by hurricane force winds or tropical storm force winds, or possibly nothing at all. I wouldn't want to be in their shoes.
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5798 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:13 pm

xironman wrote:w
Aric Dunn wrote:
xironman wrote: The last VDM

"Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind Inbound: 117kts (~ 134.6mph)"

And it was probably weaker then


no multiple dropsondes measured 127kts to 129kts after it crossed hati.

Well, #1 is that I was backing it up that 125 knots was ok because who knows if the recon flight hit the highest wind spots. #2. You don't use dropsondes for sustained wind speeds since they only capture momentary winds, AFM corrected me on that one.


They have been using dropsonde data for advisories this entire system as well as many others.

the upgrade to Cat 5 was due to multiple dropsondes.
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
DelrayMorris
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Delray Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5799 Postby DelrayMorris » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:14 pm

Happy Pelican wrote:I know all eyes are on Florida but do you think the threat to NY/Jersey Shore is somewhat off the table?


I think that it's too soon to tell, right now. Everyone on the Eastern seaboard should be monitoring this storm... maybe don't go out and buy 17 lbs of batteries that you'll never use, but general rule is that you can only discount a storm when it starts moving away from you... though Jeanne taught us that this isn't always the right way of going about it, either.
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4830
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#5800 Postby ronjon » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:15 pm

psyclone wrote:
ronjon wrote:frankly shocked the NHC didn't shift the track further west.


they've got time to make their baby steps as needed. Look at those wind probs now...Orlando with a 70% chance of ts winds IIRC....As it stands now central Florida east of US 27 is going to see some decent wind from this...and the coast looks like hammer time. Look at Palm Beach's odds.... :eek: Time to channel understandable anxiety into constructive preps..


i understand their baby step approach - from the discussion it sounds like they want at least one more round of model runs to track it for a landfall. Now if tonight's GFS makes landfall..well....
1 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests