OntarioEggplant wrote:benh316 wrote:GalvestonWXGeek wrote:
Will one of the Mods please open a ATL:Hermine-Opinions thread? That way if I need to seek out this type of mindless blather, I'll know where to find it. Quite annoying to slam into this on the DISCUSSION thread.
Mindless blather? Why? Am I not free to express my opinion on a discussion thread especially when it is trying to discern trajectory of a storm?
What is mindless about it? The fact it does not align exactly with NHC? Pretentiousness won't prove my theory of an east wobble wrong especially when others share the skepticism.
Frankly, what you said shows a complete lack of understanding of how meteorology works. Yes everyone has been frustrated with the models for this storm...but that's an artifact of how complex Hermine's environment has been. Meteorological predictions can never be perfect simply due to the fact that they are based in chaos theory which we do not have a good understanding of yet. It does not matter what you do in your career field as it does not compare to the challenges and background conditions that underly meteorological forecasting.
Too many people want a perfect black and white answer when there is not or never will be one. Understand the gray area first and why that gray area exists. Then understand why all forecasts are of the best, educated, scientific guess variety.
I really don't want to debate chaos theory and guesswork on this forum as I would rather stick to the topic at hand - there are several individuals on this forum and perhaps more outside here who believe this storm system is continuing a slightly more eastward track which would affect a lot of people sooner and who may not be prepared. That's a serious issue.
While the NHC is fairly reliable on many generalities, it is evident they have a difficult time building consensus on these storms that have less consolidation.
Your comments are appreciated, but really underline the necessity for skepticism