ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
OverlandHurricane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:50 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7421 Postby OverlandHurricane » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:59 pm

ZX12R wrote:
bahamaswx wrote:
ZX12R wrote:
That's what I was going to ask. What is the exact definition of landfall?


The center of the eye has to cross land.


Thank you, bahamaswx. Much appreciated. I love this place.


Ditto, thank you very much.
1 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7422 Postby ConvergenceZone » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:00 pm

Glad to see the Weather Channel in 24 hour coverage mode. Normally I don't care for the weather channel, but their hurricane coverage and updates is where they really shine
2 likes   

User avatar
bg1
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 11:14 am
Location: near Santee, SC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7423 Postby bg1 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:01 pm

TJRE wrote:http://goes.gsfc.nasa.gov/goescolor/goeseast/hurricane2/color_lrg/latest.jpg

GOES-13
01:30 UTC (talk about road rage)

http://goes.gsfc.nasa.gov/


It looks like it's at the bottom of a slanted rectangle of clouds. :?:
1 likes   

dukeblue219
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 535
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7424 Postby dukeblue219 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:02 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:Glad to see the Weather Channel in 24 hour coverage mode. Normally I don't care for the weather channel, but their hurricane coverage and updates is where they really shine


Ditto that I don't care for what TWC has become, but I still miss it for live storm coverage. Verizon dropped it from FiOS in favor of the Accuweather Channel. Haven't checked to see what they do during landfall...
2 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10152
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7425 Postby Blown Away » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:03 pm

Portastorm wrote:Rather sobering ...

Image


8pm was 23N/76W... Wouldn't those 001500 UTC lat/longs suggest WNW?
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7426 Postby Blinhart » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:03 pm

OK time for people to start guessing where landfall will be (if at all), and wind speed and pressure.

I'm going with either Lauderdale or Miami, winds around 165, pressure around 940.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7427 Postby ConvergenceZone » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:03 pm

I know a Cat 5 hasn't been mentioned by the NHC or even on the weather channel at all, but does anyone think this has a "chance" of hitting a low end Cat 5 for a short time before all is said and done?
1 likes   

ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7428 Postby ronyan » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:03 pm

Although I'm not a professional, I agree with the forecast of 145 mph. Conditions look good from here over the next 24-36
2 likes   

ZX12R
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:09 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7429 Postby ZX12R » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:04 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:Glad to see the Weather Channel in 24 hour coverage mode. Normally I don't care for the weather channel, but their hurricane coverage and updates is where they really shine


What is the relationship between landfall and where Cantore goes? I've seen it referred to, but don't understand it. Do storms seem to make landfall where he is? Or vice-a-versa?
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7430 Postby RL3AO » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:05 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:I know a Cat 5 hasn't been mentioned by the NHC or even on the weather channel at all, but does anyone think this has a "chance" of hitting a low end Cat 5 for a short time before all is said and done?


A chance? Sure. I'd put it maybe around 15 or 20%.
0 likes   

Soonercane

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7431 Postby Soonercane » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:06 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:I know a Cat 5 hasn't been mentioned by the NHC or even on the weather channel at all, but does anyone think this has a "chance" of hitting a low end Cat 5 for a short time before all is said and done?


Probably not it doesn't have a lot of time until it hits Florida and appears to be having structural problems... I think Cat 2 is most likely at landfall with Cat 3 also possible
0 likes   

marye45
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:51 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7432 Postby marye45 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:06 pm

ZX12R wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:Glad to see the Weather Channel in 24 hour coverage mode. Normally I don't care for the weather channel, but their hurricane coverage and updates is where they really shine


What is the relationship between landfall and where Cantore goes? I've seen it referred to, but don't understand it. Do storms seem to make landfall where he is? Or vice-a-versa?

I might be wrong but hasn't TWC kept him out of harms way since he was in Gulfport and was in the middle of the Katrina Storm surge?
0 likes   

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7433 Postby GeneratorPower » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:07 pm

RL3AO wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:I know a Cat 5 hasn't been mentioned by the NHC or even on the weather channel at all, but does anyone think this has a "chance" of hitting a low end Cat 5 for a short time before all is said and done?


A chance? Sure. I'd put it maybe around 15 or 20%.


I think a 50% chance is more than fair. It's already been a Cat 5 previously and it's moving over very favorable areas.
1 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7434 Postby Blinhart » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:07 pm

RL3AO wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:I know a Cat 5 hasn't been mentioned by the NHC or even on the weather channel at all, but does anyone think this has a "chance" of hitting a low end Cat 5 for a short time before all is said and done?


A chance? Sure. I'd put it maybe around 15 or 20%.


Why are you putting the chances so low?? With the high heat content of the water and really no high land to hurt it, too little of time?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7435 Postby ronyan » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:07 pm

Eye is becoming more defined now.
0 likes   

ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7436 Postby ronyan » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:08 pm

Blinhart wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:I know a Cat 5 hasn't been mentioned by the NHC or even on the weather channel at all, but does anyone think this has a "chance" of hitting a low end Cat 5 for a short time before all is said and done?


A chance? Sure. I'd put it maybe around 15 or 20%.


Why are you putting the chances so low?? With the high heat content of the water and really no high land to hurt it, too little of time?

The chance for a 5 generally is low 15-20% is quite alarming actually.
0 likes   

hipshot
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 591
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:18 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7437 Postby hipshot » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:08 pm

bg1 wrote:
TJRE wrote:http://goes.gsfc.nasa.gov/goescolor/goeseast/hurricane2/color_lrg/latest.jpg

GOES-13
01:30 UTC (talk about road rage)

http://goes.gsfc.nasa.gov/


It looks like it's at the bottom of a slanted rectangle of clouds. :?:

Yeah, I noticed that too, kind of weird.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7438 Postby Blinhart » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:08 pm

Soonercane wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:I know a Cat 5 hasn't been mentioned by the NHC or even on the weather channel at all, but does anyone think this has a "chance" of hitting a low end Cat 5 for a short time before all is said and done?


Probably not it doesn't have a lot of time until it hits Florida and appears to be having structural problems... I think Cat 2 is most likely at landfall with Cat 3 also possible



STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS??????? what are you watching? No way will it drop down to a Cat 2 before landfall. lowest it will be is a high end Cat 3.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3354
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7439 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:09 pm

Soonercane wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:I know a Cat 5 hasn't been mentioned by the NHC or even on the weather channel at all, but does anyone think this has a "chance" of hitting a low end Cat 5 for a short time before all is said and done?


Probably not it doesn't have a lot of time until it hits Florida and appears to be having structural problems... I think Cat 2 is most likely at landfall with Cat 3 also possible


My bet is 105 knots at landfall/closest approach. Could be proven wrong, of course, but that's just how I see it.
0 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7440 Postby ronyan » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:10 pm

That would be the strongest cat 2 you ever saw.
Image
Last edited by ronyan on Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 139 guests