ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
sponger
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:26 am
Location: St Augustine

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7681 Postby sponger » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:00 pm

swampgator92 wrote:The western jog continues. Very little northern component the last 2 hours on the NASA satellite loop.

http://weather.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... map=latlon


Just stair stepping around the high. Looks right on track unless that last wobble continued.
1 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7682 Postby Blinhart » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:00 pm

JaxGator wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:EricBlake1242 secs
@Wxmanms1 @MichaelRLowry and the 700 mb height fell 36 meters in 100 minutes. That isn't good.


Hummm...that isn't good at all. Will try to post storm reports until it gets too dangerous to do so.


I have a sister and Uncle that live in Jacksonville, one on each side of the river, I know my sister (near Orange Park) is gonna be staying put and I don't know if my Uncle is in town or not (he works all over the world) but hope everything is fine for them.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Hellicon
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:02 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7683 Postby Hellicon » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:01 pm

1 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7684 Postby Sanibel » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:01 pm

I think some people are mistaking the top of the eye in the CDO with the surface center.
0 likes   

User avatar
AdamFirst
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2491
Age: 36
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:54 am
Location: Port Saint Lucie, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7685 Postby AdamFirst » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:03 pm

Recon fixes continue to show a NW motion.

I don't wanna drop the word "wish-casting" but there's a lot of people on this board wanting to pull this into Miami-Dade, primarily because of the HRRR mesoscale run. That is an extremely irresponsible thing to say.
3 likes   
Dolphins Marlins Canes Golden Panthers HEAT
Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Wilma 2005 - Fay 2008 - Isaac 2012 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Dorian 2019 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022 - Milton 2024

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7686 Postby GeneratorPower » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:04 pm

swampgator92 wrote:The western jog continues. Very little northern component the last 2 hours on the NASA satellite loop.

http://weather.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... map=latlon


With all the talk of worst case scenarios, a Cat 4/5 into an underwarned major metro area where evacuations are deliberately being prevented? That would be worst case.
0 likes   

KC7NEC
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 12:01 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7687 Postby KC7NEC » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:04 pm

Blinhart wrote:
swampgator92 wrote:If this pulls a Charley and heads into Miami-Dade as a Cat 4 with no Hurricane Warning. Heads are going to roll at the National Hurricane Center.



And they need to, don't understand why they don't increase it to a Hurricane Warning, that way the businesses could get everything put in place.


The watches and warnings are sadly mostly formulaic. If speed X at location Y at time Z then issue A, B or C. They do not account for population, types of constructions in region, transportation, evacuations. They have no 'human' factor. I wish that even if the NHC didn't that locally at NWS or Counties they would look at factors specific to their situation.
0 likes   
// Opinions are my own, I am not a Meteorologist. Consult the NHC or Local NWS and Emergency Management for current information in your area. //

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7688 Postby Blinhart » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:05 pm

AdamFirst wrote:Recon fixes continue to show a NW motion.

I don't wanna drop the word "wish-casting" but there's a lot of people wanting to pull this into Miami-Dade, primarily because of the HRRR mesoscale run.


I'm not doing it just because of HRRR, historical patterns and current conditions just tell me that it is going to Miami-Dade.
3 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

wicked_wx_watcher
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 12:56 pm
Location: Clear Lake City/Webster, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7689 Postby wicked_wx_watcher » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:06 pm

Hammy wrote:
KC7NEC wrote:
ToxicTiger wrote:Written by University of Florida Athletics

GAINESVILLE, Fla. -- We are working closely with local, state and University officials as well as the Southeastern Conference office to monitor the progress of Hurricane Matthew and its potential impact on campus and the safety of the fans.

As of 5 p.m. on Wednesday, the game is still scheduled to be played on Saturday at 11 a.m. CT at Ben Hill Griffin Stadium. A final decision on the start time of the game will be made by 12 p.m. CT on Thursday as we continue to monitor the storm.

The game will not be moved out of Gainesville.

This is probably one of the most reckless and irresponsible decisions that I have ever seen from a public official. This decision will divert possibly a thousand first responders away from where they will desperately be needed. University of Florida President W. Kent Fuchs should be immediately fired for incompetence and reckless endangerment. Thoughts?


Absolutely disgusting. Even if there are ZERO effects there a MAJOR portion of the State will be devastated and in full disaster response. You can tell right from the statment they are thinking of this in a bubble and not in the scale if reality. VERY DISAPPOINTED.


This sounds like something that could result in major traffic impediments to relief/cleanup efforts. :roll:


They're being ridiculous about this. Do they expect to play a game with no power? What about possible water and sewage issues? How many ticket holders would actually show up? I'm sure they'll have more important things on their minds.
2 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7690 Postby Blinhart » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:07 pm

KC7NEC wrote:
Blinhart wrote:
swampgator92 wrote:If this pulls a Charley and heads into Miami-Dade as a Cat 4 with no Hurricane Warning. Heads are going to roll at the National Hurricane Center.



And they need to, don't understand why they don't increase it to a Hurricane Warning, that way the businesses could get everything put in place.


The watches and warnings are sadly mostly formulaic. If speed X at location Y at time Z then issue A, B or C. They do not account for population, types of constructions in region, transportation, evacuations. They have no 'human' factor. I wish that even if the NHC didn't that locally at NWS or Counties they would look at factors specific to their situation.


I completely agree, all those yachts that are gonna get destroyed, all the other stuff, human factor needs to be put into this now a days.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
AdamFirst
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2491
Age: 36
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:54 am
Location: Port Saint Lucie, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7691 Postby AdamFirst » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:07 pm

Blinhart wrote:
AdamFirst wrote:Recon fixes continue to show a NW motion.

I don't wanna drop the word "wish-casting" but there's a lot of people wanting to pull this into Miami-Dade, primarily because of the HRRR mesoscale run.


I'm not doing it just because of HRRR, historical patterns and current conditions just tell me that it is going to Miami-Dade.


But the Hurricane Center and Model Guidance, as well as actual current motion from aircraft reconnaissance, doesn't. This storm is on track.
1 likes   
Dolphins Marlins Canes Golden Panthers HEAT
Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Wilma 2005 - Fay 2008 - Isaac 2012 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Dorian 2019 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022 - Milton 2024

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7692 Postby GeneratorPower » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:07 pm

Blinhart wrote:
AdamFirst wrote:Recon fixes continue to show a NW motion.

I don't wanna drop the word "wish-casting" but there's a lot of people wanting to pull this into Miami-Dade, primarily because of the HRRR mesoscale run.


I'm not doing it just because of HRRR, historical patterns and current conditions just tell me that it is going to Miami-Dade.


Benchmark is Andros Island. Left of Andros, watch out. Right over or right of Andros, on track.
0 likes   

User avatar
ALhurricane
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 452
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Daphne, AL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7693 Postby ALhurricane » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:07 pm

KC7NEC wrote:
Blinhart wrote:
swampgator92 wrote:If this pulls a Charley and heads into Miami-Dade as a Cat 4 with no Hurricane Warning. Heads are going to roll at the National Hurricane Center.



And they need to, don't understand why they don't increase it to a Hurricane Warning, that way the businesses could get everything put in place.


The watches and warnings are sadly mostly formulaic. If speed X at location Y at time Z then issue A, B or C. They do not account for population, types of constructions in region, transportation, evacuations. They have no 'human' factor. I wish that even if the NHC didn't that locally at NWS or Counties they would look at factors specific to their situation.


There is a lot more than you realize that goes into it.
2 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7694 Postby Blinhart » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:09 pm

ALhurricane wrote:
KC7NEC wrote:
Blinhart wrote:

And they need to, don't understand why they don't increase it to a Hurricane Warning, that way the businesses could get everything put in place.


The watches and warnings are sadly mostly formulaic. If speed X at location Y at time Z then issue A, B or C. They do not account for population, types of constructions in region, transportation, evacuations. They have no 'human' factor. I wish that even if the NHC didn't that locally at NWS or Counties they would look at factors specific to their situation.


There is a lot more than you realize that goes into it.


Not really.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

SapphireSea
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:13 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7695 Postby SapphireSea » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:09 pm

Blinhart wrote:
AdamFirst wrote:Recon fixes continue to show a NW motion.

I don't wanna drop the word "wish-casting" but there's a lot of people wanting to pull this into Miami-Dade, primarily because of the HRRR mesoscale run.


I'm not doing it just because of HRRR, historical patterns and current conditions just tell me that it is going to Miami-Dade.


Historical patterns? If it were late Aug, Early Sept I would believe you. Pattern and path do not seem to sync up to me. Now that the threat materilized I guess next 8 hours will be key. If it slows down and stays NW it will likely keep east, if it slows down but heads further west then it may indicate a change. If it stays same speed and more west then obviously something is going on. But likely going to be on NHC track line.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7696 Postby Hurricaneman » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:10 pm

what happens if Matthew loops around and give some sections of Florida round 2 of hurricane conditions
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7697 Postby wxmann_91 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:10 pm

Blinhart wrote:
AdamFirst wrote:Recon fixes continue to show a NW motion.

I don't wanna drop the word "wish-casting" but there's a lot of people wanting to pull this into Miami-Dade, primarily because of the HRRR mesoscale run.


I'm not doing it just because of HRRR, historical patterns and current conditions just tell me that it is going to Miami-Dade.

Which historical patterns? Do you have 500mb analogs? Currents trends are near or slightly north of guidance which points well north of Miami-Dade.

Nothing against you personally, but because so many people are getting information off these boards right now, all claims that deviate significantly from official forecasts should be substantiated by sound meteorological reasoning.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
2 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7698 Postby RL3AO » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:10 pm

Blinhart wrote:
Not really.


Yes really. You're dead wrong. Every watch/warning issued by NHC is coordinated with local emergency management and local NWS offices.
6 likes   

tatertawt24
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:57 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7699 Postby tatertawt24 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:11 pm

Image

Literally looks like somebody poked a hole in it.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ALhurricane
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 452
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Daphne, AL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7700 Postby ALhurricane » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:11 pm

Blinhart wrote:
ALhurricane wrote:
KC7NEC wrote:
The watches and warnings are sadly mostly formulaic. If speed X at location Y at time Z then issue A, B or C. They do not account for population, types of constructions in region, transportation, evacuations. They have no 'human' factor. I wish that even if the NHC didn't that locally at NWS or Counties they would look at factors specific to their situation.


There is a lot more than you realize that goes into it.


Not really.


Lol. Considering that's what I do, I should know.
Last edited by ALhurricane on Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
10 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests