ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20011
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8261 Postby tolakram » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:37 am

Sanibel wrote:Category 5 is unpredictable at the moment in my opinion because the hurricane is showing signs of lacking wind speeds and dropping pressure at the same time. Hard call. So far it hasn't made category 4.


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.


You should know better though. Pressure drops before winds, that is how they strengthen.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1699
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8262 Postby MississippiWx » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:38 am

gatorcane wrote:Deep convection right around the eye about ready to wrap, this thing is intensifying and the Gulf Stream awaits :double:


Yep. He hasn't even reached the Gulf Stream yet. Just added fuel to the fire.
0 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8263 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:38 am

TheStormExpert wrote:
dhweather wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:Please do not say this could become a Cat.5, where I am in Palm Beach Gardens I am just 4miles from the coast and in an evacuation zone for a Cat.5 so I am praying that it struggles to intensify if at all. :eek:


I would be getting my evacuation plans finalized. Do not be wishing you had evacuated because it "was only a 3 or 4".
Well we fared VERY well for Frances, Jeanne, and Wilma in terms of our house. By the way it's a solid Concrete Built House with a tiled roof in a uniform development. In fact most in this community are not evacuating that we know of. What's your take?

cat 4/5 winds are capable of tearing down concrete structures.
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8264 Postby TheStormExpert » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:38 am

Sanibel wrote:Category 5 is unpredictable at the moment in my opinion because the hurricane is showing signs of lacking wind speeds and dropping pressure at the same time. Hard call. So far it hasn't made category 4.


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

I'd be surprised if this wasn't upgraded to a minimal 130mph Cat.4 @11am.
0 likes   

User avatar
CourierPR
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1335
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8265 Postby CourierPR » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:38 am

Sanibel wrote:Category 5 is unpredictable at the moment in my opinion because the hurricane is showing signs of lacking wind speeds and dropping pressure at the same time. Hard call. So far it hasn't made category 4.


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.


Did you mean to say, "lagging wind speeds"?
0 likes   

JPmia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8266 Postby JPmia » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:40 am

TheStormExpert wrote:
dhweather wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:Please do not say this could become a Cat.5, where I am in Palm Beach Gardens I am just 4miles from the coast and in an evacuation zone for a Cat.5 so I am praying that it struggles to intensify if at all. :eek:


I would be getting my evacuation plans finalized. Do not be wishing you had evacuated because it "was only a 3 or 4".
Well we fared VERY well for Frances, Jeanne, and Wilma in terms of our house. By the way it's a solid Concrete Built House with a tiled roof in a uniform development. In fact most in this community are not evacuating that we know of. What's your take?


If they call for an evacuation.. evacuate. I love hurricanes, but not Cat 4s-5s.
1 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8267 Postby Ken711 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:40 am

TheStormExpert wrote:
Sanibel wrote:Category 5 is unpredictable at the moment in my opinion because the hurricane is showing signs of lacking wind speeds and dropping pressure at the same time. Hard call. So far it hasn't made category 4.


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

I'd be surprised if this wasn't upgraded to a minimal 130mph Cat.4 @11am.


Very possible unfortunately.
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8268 Postby hurricaneCW » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:41 am

Although it's impossible to know if it'll be a category 5 upon landfall, it's smaller size and passage over the gulf stream makes it more likely than normal. Because it's compact most of the energy is centered in its eyewall so it's very Andrew-like in distribution. More focused energy could equal stronger winds inside that wall. I suspect that whoever gets hit by the eyewall will see complete destruction.
Last edited by hurricaneCW on Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8269 Postby Sanibel » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:41 am

tolakram wrote:
You should know better though. Pressure drops before winds, that is how they strengthen.



True. For years I have been trumpeting Gulf Stream boosting and most of the time it fails to appear. Probably the one time I underplay it it will burst over the Gulf Stream...Hurricanes are fickle creatures and we'll see what it does shortly...Perhaps a pressure drop prior to the Gulf Stream is a tight spring waiting to snap.


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Last edited by Sanibel on Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Batt2fd
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:24 am
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8270 Postby Batt2fd » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:42 am

0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11500
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8271 Postby GCANE » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:42 am

Eyewall is really going to town - that hot tower did the trick, like usual.

http://weather.graphics/mrms/florida/fl ... r_long.gif
1 likes   

Chris_in_Tampa
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5075
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8272 Postby Chris_in_Tampa » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:43 am

Hamanard wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:is there seriously not continuous recon flights? there is going to be a 2 hour gap here.


Sure looks like it. AF mission #27 is gaining altitude and leaving. We got one plane from Tampa heading there and one more from St Croix about to depart. One of them at least has to be a low level mission. Very strange to not have a continues fix until landfall.


Next Air Force mission is already on the way. I didn't realize. At 10:38am EDT, it was 38 miles to the SSE from Gulfport, MS.

NOAA P-3 had landed earlier. It will likely takeoff again around 1:30pm ED to 2pm EDT. The G-IV was undergoing maintenance, and I don't know when it will be available again. So the P-3 might do another G-IV mission track around the storm rather than into the storm as a research mission.

The Air Force aircraft in St. Croix is either an aircraft that will head back to Keesler AFB, after having been in Matthew earlier in the storm's life, or is one going there for later, for perhaps the area east of the Lesser Antilles. I would think going back to Keesler.
1 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8273 Postby 1900hurricane » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:43 am

Just for the record, 12Z working best track update had Matthew back up to 115 kt. NHC's advisory should be at least that intense.
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1699
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8274 Postby MississippiWx » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:43 am

For the next couple of hours, keep an eye on that NW quadrant. It has been a little ragged on satellite. If it's able to become more uniform with the rest of the CDO, then you'll start having to worry about Cat 5. Cat 5's have a perfect appearance in satellite imagery. Matthew is making progress in that direction, but it's not there yet.
1 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

delta lady
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 7:37 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8275 Postby delta lady » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:45 am

Blinhart wrote:
JaxGator wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:EricBlake1242 secs
@Wxmanms1 @MichaelRLowry and the 700 mb height fell 36 meters in 100 minutes. That isn't good.


Hummm...that isn't good at all. Will try to post storm reports until it gets too dangerous to do so.


I have a sister and Uncle that live in Jacksonville, one on each side of the river, I know my sister (near Orange Park) is gonna be staying put and I don't know if my Uncle is in town or not (he works all over the world) but hope everything is fine for them.

They have added a zone C to Duval/Jax. It basically covers all areas along the St John's River and it's tributaries. One good thing for your sister is that the time Matthew is forecast to pass Jax we will be in a 'low tide' . Not that it means much. When I first moved to Jax I was 50 feet away from the Trout River. A tributary into the St John's River. A MINOR cane that we were barely in the fringes of, brought the water to within 4 inches of the top of the sea wall.
0 likes   

hipshot
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 591
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:18 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8276 Postby hipshot » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:45 am

dhweather wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:Please do not say this could become a Cat.5, where I am in Palm Beach Gardens I am just 4miles from the coast and in an evacuation zone for a Cat.5 so I am praying that it struggles to intensify if at all. :eek:


I would be getting my evacuation plans finalized. Do not be wishing you had evacuated because it "was only a 3 or 4".

At this late date, you could have real problems getting out of Dodge, seen issues with several wrecks on I-95.
0 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8277 Postby 1900hurricane » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:45 am

Off-white pixel spotted in the eye.

Image
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

User avatar
mpic
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Splendora, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8278 Postby mpic » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:45 am

0 likes   
Alicia, Rita, Ike, Harvey and Beryl...moved to Splendora lol

AlabamaDave
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 6:44 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8279 Postby AlabamaDave » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:46 am

Image

What Andrew did. So y'all are STAYING for this?
6 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8280 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:46 am

MississippiWx wrote:For the next couple of hours, keep an eye on that NW quadrant. It has been a little ragged on satellite. If it's able to become more uniform with the rest of the CDO, then you'll start having to worry about Cat 5. Cat 5's have a perfect appearance in satellite imagery. Matthew is making progress in that direction, but it's not there yet.


that is not true.. the sat appearance when it was a cat 5 was quite ragged. looks are not everything. it could easily make cat 5..
3 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests