ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
NW quad looks improved in the last frame, we'll see if that can persist but ragged and thin look hasn't seemed to matter much so far.
Last edited by ronyan on Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
This is my location for what its worth. No option but to ride it out.


0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
ROCK wrote:Andrew bombed over the GS as it approach FL...lets not forget
Most objective evidence points to a completion of an ERC as the reason for Andrew's last-minute intensification. It's become something of a myth that the Gulf Stream has magical properties. The waters in the Bahamas are perfectly warm enough to support a Cat 4/5 hurricane, Gulf Stream or not.
2 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Watching the news right now, looks like it's getting quite windy at the West Palm Beach. Is that windy condition already a direct effect of Matthew?
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- meriland23
- Category 5
- Posts: 1239
- Age: 37
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
I agree that cat 5 hurricanes are hard to maintain, however, at least in Matthews case, has been easy to reach. This rapid intensification overnight is very reminiscent of the beginning of Matthew and how quickly he blew up to a cat 5. Seeing as he bumped up a whopping 15 mph in a mere few hours makes me very confident that he will achieve Cat 5 status today. I'm not a professional, but I mean, look at it..look at the radar. Its insane and looking meaner every minute.
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
ronyan wrote:NW quad looks improved in the last frame, we'll see if that can persist but ragged and thin look hasn't seemed to matter much so far.
I wish a met would chime in on why its appearance has continued to look ragged ever since it emerged from Cuba. Obviously it's strengthening and cosmetic appearances probably are secondary, but relatively speaking this is the most unimpressive Cat 4 that I've seen just judging from IR. Has it been dealing with modest NW shear? Most of the convection and feeders seem confined to the S and SW quadrants.
0 likes
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9476
- Age: 34
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
KC7NEC wrote:La Sirena wrote:brunota2003 wrote:https://twitter.com/spacebrendan/status/784023687779512320
If anyone has any contacts, can we attempt to get those 139 people out of there? Really? I don't care if NASA has a super awesome, state of the art bunker...there is NO reason 139 people should be staying behind. Period.
As a side note, here are what the facilities were originally designed for:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CuFnOTfW8AA ... name=large
I understand the adrenaline junkie aspect but that's damn near suicidal. I hope they've written their pertinent information on their arm. Terrible decision.
This is not just a random group. they are highly trained, have a extremely well-built bunker, supplies, and everything needed. They have to stay. There are certain critical facilities there that if damaged could be a disaster all on its own not counting the hurricane. This storm is going to devastate the space industry for months
They are on a spit of land that will likely be completely covered in 6-9ft of water, and what is above water will likely be ravaged by 120+ mph sustained winds and gusts of 140+ mph. It doesn't matter if they are physically there or not, at that point there is literally NOTHING anyone can do. Button it all up the best you can and get EVERYONE OUT.
Last edited by brunota2003 on Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
Just a small town southern boy helping other humans.
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
I've been seeing the models come to an almost consensus that the east turn will occur farther up the SC coast, yet the NHC's cone seems to put the turn near the GA/SC line. I wonder why. Are they waiting for another set of runs? I'm concerned as I live 45 miles NW of Charleston.
2 likes
- 1900hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 6059
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Uhhh...


1 likes
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Might be a while before we have another recon pass. Seems like the aircraft out of Kessler AFB is turning around...
0 likes
- MississippiWx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
- Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
1900hurricane wrote:Uhhh...
They forgot to wait until I got on the plane. Coming back for me.

2 likes
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Looks like a west-northwest wobble on radar. Might just clip the north end of Andros island.
0 likes
- MGC
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5899
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
- Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
ROCK wrote:dukeblue219 wrote:MGC wrote:140....not surprised. Could bet a bit stronger but I doubt Matt reaches Cat-5. If the eyewall get on shore there will be massive damage. On shore wind is going to drive massive waves onshore. Waves could reach second floor of building along the coast. Katrina like damage along the beach.......MGC
I concur that a Cat5 is unlikely, simply because it's HARD for any hurricane to maintain that strength, regardless of water temperature, particularly near any kind of land. It *could* happen, but the preparations and evacuations should be the same either way. I hope people remember that Katrina made landfall with 125mph sustained winds, and was weakening at the time. New Orleans' damage was a special case, but Katrina also obliterated gulf coastal Mississippi. The winds are but one factor. A 125mph storm and a 155mph storm can be equally devastating depending on where they hit and how the storm surge develops.
I hope nobody is riding this thing out hoping it will be "just" a cat3 or cat4.
oh he will make a run at a cat 5....already winds catching up to pressure drop. Andrew bombed over the GS as it approach FL...lets not forget
Andrew had a very strong high to its north helping to increase the pressure gradient. That is not the case here. Sure it is possible for Matt to get to Cat-5 but that is a very rare event......MGC
0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 7:24 pm
- Location: GA
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Latest track looks worse for Jax with proximity and intensity
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
1900hurricane wrote:Uhhh...
They said NOPE, NOPE NOPE
5 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Major squall line coming into FT Lauderdale now.
Probably 50 knot winds.
[img]http://radblast-aa.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/radar/WUNIDS_map?station=AMX&brand=wui&num=6&delay=15&type=N0R&frame=0&scale=0.622&noclutter=0&t=1180778261&lat=0&lon=0&label=you&showstorms=31&map.x=400&map.y=240¢erx=472¢ery=243&transx=72&transy=3&showlabels=1&severe=0&rainsnow=0&lightning=0
[/img]
[url]http://radblast-aa.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/radar/WUNIDS_map?station=AMX&brand=wui&num=6&delay=15&type=N0R&frame=0&scale=0.622&noclutter=0&t=1180778261&lat=0&lon=0&label=you&showstorms=31&map.x=400&map.y=240¢erx=472¢ery=243&transx=72&transy=3&showlabels=1&severe=0&rainsnow=0&lightning=0
[/url]
Probably 50 knot winds.
[img]http://radblast-aa.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/radar/WUNIDS_map?station=AMX&brand=wui&num=6&delay=15&type=N0R&frame=0&scale=0.622&noclutter=0&t=1180778261&lat=0&lon=0&label=you&showstorms=31&map.x=400&map.y=240¢erx=472¢ery=243&transx=72&transy=3&showlabels=1&severe=0&rainsnow=0&lightning=0
[/img]
[url]http://radblast-aa.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/radar/WUNIDS_map?station=AMX&brand=wui&num=6&delay=15&type=N0R&frame=0&scale=0.622&noclutter=0&t=1180778261&lat=0&lon=0&label=you&showstorms=31&map.x=400&map.y=240¢erx=472¢ery=243&transx=72&transy=3&showlabels=1&severe=0&rainsnow=0&lightning=0
[/url]
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 7183
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Nimbus wrote:Major squall line coming into FT Lauderdale now.
Probably 50 knot winds.
[img]http://radblast-aa.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/radar/WUNIDS_map?station=AMX&brand=wui&num=6&delay=15&type=N0R&frame=0&scale=0.622&noclutter=0&t=1180778261&lat=0&lon=0&label=you&showstorms=31&map.x=400&map.y=240¢erx=472¢ery=243&transx=72&transy=3&showlabels=1&severe=0&rainsnow=0&lightning=0
[/img]
[url]http://radblast-aa.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/radar/WUNIDS_map?station=AMX&brand=wui&num=6&delay=15&type=N0R&frame=0&scale=0.622&noclutter=0&t=1180778261&lat=0&lon=0&label=you&showstorms=31&map.x=400&map.y=240¢erx=472¢ery=243&transx=72&transy=3&showlabels=1&severe=0&rainsnow=0&lightning=0
[/url]
just to my east, no rain but i can see the darkening clouds
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
snowpocalypse wrote:Latest track looks worse for Jax with proximity and intensity
Jax's Hurr wind probs went up a lot...now 25%. Orlando is now at 40%!
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests