ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8341 Postby ronyan » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:21 am

NW quad looks improved in the last frame, we'll see if that can persist but ragged and thin look hasn't seemed to matter much so far.
Last edited by ronyan on Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Scorpion

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8342 Postby Scorpion » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:22 am

This is my location for what its worth. No option but to ride it out.

Image
0 likes   

crm6360

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8343 Postby crm6360 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:23 am

ROCK wrote:Andrew bombed over the GS as it approach FL...lets not forget

Most objective evidence points to a completion of an ERC as the reason for Andrew's last-minute intensification. It's become something of a myth that the Gulf Stream has magical properties. The waters in the Bahamas are perfectly warm enough to support a Cat 4/5 hurricane, Gulf Stream or not.
2 likes   

dexterlabio
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8344 Postby dexterlabio » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:24 am

Watching the news right now, looks like it's getting quite windy at the West Palm Beach. Is that windy condition already a direct effect of Matthew?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

windnrain
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 670
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Baton Rouge

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8345 Postby windnrain » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:24 am

Matthew heading to very warm SSTs

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8346 Postby meriland23 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:24 am

I agree that cat 5 hurricanes are hard to maintain, however, at least in Matthews case, has been easy to reach. This rapid intensification overnight is very reminiscent of the beginning of Matthew and how quickly he blew up to a cat 5. Seeing as he bumped up a whopping 15 mph in a mere few hours makes me very confident that he will achieve Cat 5 status today. I'm not a professional, but I mean, look at it..look at the radar. Its insane and looking meaner every minute.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

crm6360

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8347 Postby crm6360 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:26 am

ronyan wrote:NW quad looks improved in the last frame, we'll see if that can persist but ragged and thin look hasn't seemed to matter much so far.

I wish a met would chime in on why its appearance has continued to look ragged ever since it emerged from Cuba. Obviously it's strengthening and cosmetic appearances probably are secondary, but relatively speaking this is the most unimpressive Cat 4 that I've seen just judging from IR. Has it been dealing with modest NW shear? Most of the convection and feeders seem confined to the S and SW quadrants.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8348 Postby brunota2003 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:27 am

KC7NEC wrote:
La Sirena wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:https://twitter.com/spacebrendan/status/784023687779512320

If anyone has any contacts, can we attempt to get those 139 people out of there? Really? I don't care if NASA has a super awesome, state of the art bunker...there is NO reason 139 people should be staying behind. Period.

As a side note, here are what the facilities were originally designed for:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CuFnOTfW8AA ... name=large

I understand the adrenaline junkie aspect but that's damn near suicidal. I hope they've written their pertinent information on their arm. Terrible decision.


This is not just a random group. they are highly trained, have a extremely well-built bunker, supplies, and everything needed. They have to stay. There are certain critical facilities there that if damaged could be a disaster all on its own not counting the hurricane. This storm is going to devastate the space industry for months

They are on a spit of land that will likely be completely covered in 6-9ft of water, and what is above water will likely be ravaged by 120+ mph sustained winds and gusts of 140+ mph. It doesn't matter if they are physically there or not, at that point there is literally NOTHING anyone can do. Button it all up the best you can and get EVERYONE OUT.
Last edited by brunota2003 on Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
Just a small town southern boy helping other humans.

User avatar
bg1
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 11:14 am
Location: near Santee, SC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8349 Postby bg1 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:28 am

I've been seeing the models come to an almost consensus that the east turn will occur farther up the SC coast, yet the NHC's cone seems to put the turn near the GA/SC line. I wonder why. Are they waiting for another set of runs? I'm concerned as I live 45 miles NW of Charleston.
2 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8350 Postby 1900hurricane » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:28 am

Uhhh...

Image
1 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

Hamanard
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:14 pm
Location: Skidaway Island, GA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8351 Postby Hamanard » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:28 am

Might be a while before we have another recon pass. Seems like the aircraft out of Kessler AFB is turning around...
0 likes   

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1699
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8352 Postby MississippiWx » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:29 am

1900hurricane wrote:Uhhh...

Image


They forgot to wait until I got on the plane. Coming back for me. :ggreen:
2 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

miamijaaz
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 3:40 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8353 Postby miamijaaz » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:29 am

Looks like a west-northwest wobble on radar. Might just clip the north end of Andros island.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5899
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8354 Postby MGC » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:30 am

ROCK wrote:
dukeblue219 wrote:
MGC wrote:140....not surprised. Could bet a bit stronger but I doubt Matt reaches Cat-5. If the eyewall get on shore there will be massive damage. On shore wind is going to drive massive waves onshore. Waves could reach second floor of building along the coast. Katrina like damage along the beach.......MGC


I concur that a Cat5 is unlikely, simply because it's HARD for any hurricane to maintain that strength, regardless of water temperature, particularly near any kind of land. It *could* happen, but the preparations and evacuations should be the same either way. I hope people remember that Katrina made landfall with 125mph sustained winds, and was weakening at the time. New Orleans' damage was a special case, but Katrina also obliterated gulf coastal Mississippi. The winds are but one factor. A 125mph storm and a 155mph storm can be equally devastating depending on where they hit and how the storm surge develops.

I hope nobody is riding this thing out hoping it will be "just" a cat3 or cat4.


oh he will make a run at a cat 5....already winds catching up to pressure drop. Andrew bombed over the GS as it approach FL...lets not forget


Andrew had a very strong high to its north helping to increase the pressure gradient. That is not the case here. Sure it is possible for Matt to get to Cat-5 but that is a very rare event......MGC
0 likes   

snowpocalypse
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 7:24 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8355 Postby snowpocalypse » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:30 am

Latest track looks worse for Jax with proximity and intensity
0 likes   

User avatar
Agua
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8356 Postby Agua » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:31 am

1900hurricane wrote:Uhhh...



They said NOPE, NOPE NOPE
5 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5303
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8357 Postby Nimbus » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:31 am

Major squall line coming into FT Lauderdale now.
Probably 50 knot winds.

[img]http://radblast-aa.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/radar/WUNIDS_map?station=AMX&brand=wui&num=6&delay=15&type=N0R&frame=0&scale=0.622&noclutter=0&t=1180778261&lat=0&lon=0&label=you&showstorms=31&map.x=400&map.y=240&centerx=472&centery=243&transx=72&transy=3&showlabels=1&severe=0&rainsnow=0&lightning=0
[/img]

[url]http://radblast-aa.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/radar/WUNIDS_map?station=AMX&brand=wui&num=6&delay=15&type=N0R&frame=0&scale=0.622&noclutter=0&t=1180778261&lat=0&lon=0&label=you&showstorms=31&map.x=400&map.y=240&centerx=472&centery=243&transx=72&transy=3&showlabels=1&severe=0&rainsnow=0&lightning=0
[/url]
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8358 Postby Sanibel » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:33 am

Probably a mechanical return to base...
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7183
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8359 Postby jlauderdal » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:33 am

Nimbus wrote:Major squall line coming into FT Lauderdale now.
Probably 50 knot winds.

[img]http://radblast-aa.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/radar/WUNIDS_map?station=AMX&brand=wui&num=6&delay=15&type=N0R&frame=0&scale=0.622&noclutter=0&t=1180778261&lat=0&lon=0&label=you&showstorms=31&map.x=400&map.y=240&centerx=472&centery=243&transx=72&transy=3&showlabels=1&severe=0&rainsnow=0&lightning=0
[/img]

[url]http://radblast-aa.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/radar/WUNIDS_map?station=AMX&brand=wui&num=6&delay=15&type=N0R&frame=0&scale=0.622&noclutter=0&t=1180778261&lat=0&lon=0&label=you&showstorms=31&map.x=400&map.y=240&centerx=472&centery=243&transx=72&transy=3&showlabels=1&severe=0&rainsnow=0&lightning=0
[/url]


just to my east, no rain but i can see the darkening clouds
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4762
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8360 Postby psyclone » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:34 am

snowpocalypse wrote:Latest track looks worse for Jax with proximity and intensity


Jax's Hurr wind probs went up a lot...now 25%. Orlando is now at 40%!
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests