ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
TimeZone

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8581 Postby TimeZone » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:08 pm

tolakram wrote:Saved radar loop.

Image


Storm looks quite a bit further E than I was anticipating.
1 likes   

StormHunter72
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 6:36 am
Location: Nature Coast

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8582 Postby StormHunter72 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:09 pm

Looking like gfs may be the founder of a trend. Keep him away
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11497
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8583 Postby GCANE » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:09 pm

That new eyewall is about 4 counties wide

Image
0 likes   

ZX12R
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:09 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8584 Postby ZX12R » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:09 pm

tolakram wrote:
TimeZone wrote:ERC will most certainly prevent Matthew from attaining Cat 5 status. Could potentially even weaken him to a cat 3.


Don't make definitive statements you can't backup, there's no need for that here. No one knows if this will prevent cat 5 or not, it depends how long it takes and how long Matthew is over water. If it greatly expands the wind field then it may make this storm a lot worse than a smaller core cat 5.


Plenty of time left over warm water, for things to happen.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7183
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8585 Postby jlauderdal » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:09 pm

SFLcane wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
SFLcane wrote:Ouch! Nbc6 morales giving the all clear in dade and broward and Rick knabb contredicting eveything he said saying to respect warnings. The was crazy to see
i saw it too, lets see how the track works next few hours...radar shows it should be raining in my area...its completely dry...winds are picking up


To much focus on core. Bands will still sweep through. That seen on nbc6 was just odd I think knabb was upset
59 mph gust at port everglades...i suspect knabb will speak with morales after the event...john is good but he was a little to giddy...saying the core was going to miss is fine because it is but then ensure everyone understands the worst is coming
0 likes   

Exalt
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:55 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8586 Postby Exalt » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:10 pm

TimeZone wrote:
tolakram wrote:Saved radar loop.

[ img]http://i.imgur.com/ZDkzDgf.gif[/img]


Storm looks quite a bit further E than I was anticipating.


That's a moat if I've ever seen one.
0 likes   

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8587 Postby floridasun78 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:10 pm

not sure how long i going have internet or tv when stronger wind come into dade their reporting power issue in dade an d broward
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8588 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:11 pm

NOaa plane is on the way from tampa finally. :)
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Raebie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8589 Postby Raebie » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:11 pm

How long does a ERC typically take once the outer wall forms? And how much time does Matt have left over water?
1 likes   

User avatar
cjrciadt
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1616
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Kissimmee, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8590 Postby cjrciadt » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:11 pm

GCANE wrote:That new eyewall is about 4 counties wide

Image

I remember Frances had a gigantic eye of the coast, but it was not a double eyewall.
1 likes   

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2367
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8591 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:11 pm

I think an expanded wind field could be much more damaging than a 10-15 mph increase in wind speed. ERCs tend to greatly expand the wind field pretty quickly exposing more people to damaging winds
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

SapphireSea
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:13 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8592 Postby SapphireSea » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:11 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
SFLcane wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:i saw it too, lets see how the track works next few hours...radar shows it should be raining in my area...its completely dry...winds are picking up


To much focus on core. Bands will still sweep through. That seen on nbc6 was just odd I think knabb was upset
59 mph gust at port everglades...i suspect knabb will speak with morales after the event...john is good but he was a little to giddy...saying the core was going to miss is fine because it is but then ensure everyone understands the worst is coming


Im less than 2 miles from Port Everglades and I saw no such gusts. Perhaps its over the water or literally over the coast area.
0 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8593 Postby Ken711 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:12 pm

What's the latest pressure?
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8594 Postby dhweather » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:13 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:
dhweather wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:Please do not say this could become a Cat.5, where I am in Palm Beach Gardens I am just 4miles from the coast and in an evacuation zone for a Cat.5 so I am praying that it struggles to intensify if at all. :eek:


I would be getting my evacuation plans finalized. Do not be wishing you had evacuated because it "was only a 3 or 4".
Well we fared VERY well for Frances, Jeanne, and Wilma in terms of our house. By the way it's a solid Concrete Built House with a tiled roof in a uniform development. In fact most in this community are not evacuating that we know of. What's your take?


Wilma made landfall on the Gulf side of Florida, then crossed the state before you felt any effects. Frances and Jeanne both made landfall to your North, meaning the worst of the weather was to your North.

Maybe Matthew follows suit, maybe he does not. If you are wrong and Matthew jogs slightly to the West, you could very well have the core of a cat 4 or 5 on top of you. Of course, while the hurricane is ongoing, you cannot evacuate, you are stuck. Better safe than sorry. I was five miles inland for Katrina and Ivan, I still evacuated, you just don't risk it in a major.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by dhweather is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2367
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8595 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:14 pm

Raebie wrote:How long does a ERC typically take once the outer wall forms? And how much time does Matt have left over water?

Its hard to say. Skill in ERCs is very low, and each storm is different.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

swampgator92

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8596 Postby swampgator92 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:14 pm

StormHunter72 wrote:Looking like gfs may be the founder of a trend. Keep him away


What are you talking about? 12Z GFS brings Matthew inland north of Cape Canaveral.

Image
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8597 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:14 pm

Raebie wrote:How long does a ERC typically take once the outer wall forms? And how much time does Matt have left over water?


all depends on many factors.. big one is the size.. this is a pretty small system so it could take hours..


honestly its happening rather quickly already interesting to see..
2 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8598 Postby TheStormExpert » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:15 pm

GCANE wrote:That new eyewall is about 4 counties wide

Image

That's an Eye-Wall!? :eek:
:double:
1 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7183
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8599 Postby jlauderdal » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:15 pm

SapphireSea wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
SFLcane wrote:
To much focus on core. Bands will still sweep through. That seen on nbc6 was just odd I think knabb was upset
59 mph gust at port everglades...i suspect knabb will speak with morales after the event...john is good but he was a little to giddy...saying the core was going to miss is fine because it is but then ensure everyone understands the worst is coming


Im less than 2 miles from Port Everglades and I saw no such gusts. Perhaps its over the water or literally over the coast area.
nws has it up on there site as local storm report..remember these feeder bands can produce conditions not seen just a few miles away

http://kamala.cod.edu/fl/latest.nwus52.KMFL.html
0 likes   

Exalt
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:55 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#8600 Postby Exalt » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:15 pm

ZX12R wrote:
tolakram wrote:
TimeZone wrote:ERC will most certainly prevent Matthew from attaining Cat 5 status. Could potentially even weaken him to a cat 3.


Don't make definitive statements you can't backup, there's no need for that here. No one knows if this will prevent cat 5 or not, it depends how long it takes and how long Matthew is over water. If it greatly expands the wind field then it may make this storm a lot worse than a smaller core cat 5.


Plenty of time left over warm water, for things to happen.


Exactly, especially how it's tracking a bit east of the NHC, and how good it's been at rebuilding, may I remind you of the small ERC that happened prior to the Haiti landfall where it remained stable.
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests