ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9781 Postby brunota2003 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:09 pm

ncweatherwizard wrote:There used to be something like that, but it wasn't really frequented all that much. I don't really come on here much anymore, but I prefer just having things the way they are now. I can cut through the BS pretty easily, and I enjoy answering questions when I can.

Yeah, I realized afterwards that apparently that forum no longer exists (despite showing it is there, guess it was never ported over during the upgrade). The whole reason it wasn't frequented was because most people couldn't post there, and it just never really caught on.
0 likes   
Just a small town southern boy helping other humans.

Mello1
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 2:08 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9782 Postby Mello1 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:09 pm

bevgo wrote:Let's talk surge a bit. After Katrina I came across houses that were deposited in the street. My home had some water.....not sure how much as we bought it long after Katrina but the house next door was a pile of bricks. It is still nothing but a slab and piles of bricks. Surge is really bad. I had a patient close to a source of water....not ON the water. His home went under. He was sheltering in his truck because home was a trailer. He had to swim out when water filled his truck. He was covered by fire ant bites from them being in the water. Said he saw lots of snakes and they were all in the trees. He was unable to rest while swimming due to so many snakes and ants. Katrina was a day storm so he was able to see well. If it had been night he likely would died from grabbing a limb and being bitten by a snake. Run from water, hide from wind.

If there is still anyone who thinks this storm isn't about much, I just saw the worst video ever. Someone in a high rise near a road along the ocean. The surge was coming in and these cars were driving and the water just went over them and covered them. Why they were out there driving at a time like this I don't know, but wave after wave of water was going over them.

I hope they survived that. They are fortunate that their cars waan't swept out to sea.
0 likes   

User avatar
mpic
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Splendora, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9783 Postby mpic » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:09 pm

WilmingtonSandbar wrote:
fci wrote:
WilmingtonSandbar wrote:
I'm going to have to disagree with you on one point Psyclone. Even though this board is probably in the top 3 of tropical weather information sites, it has always been notoriously Florida centric. When Matthew clears Florida, traffic will drop off 80% from what it is now. GA, SC, and NC will not "get it's deserved attention". I'm not upset. I know that at least 80%, and probably 90% of the members are from Florida, so I understand. I just wish that the zeal for tropical weather was as strong when Florida wasn't effected.


I think that when there is a Texas or La. threat the board traffic ramps up too. I think a lot of members live there too.
I know when there is a threat there and a possible landfall; I refrain from posting. They don't need my "sage wisdom" when they are under the gun. I respect their space then.


I personally would like sage wisdom, even if it is from India. Wisdom is always good.


I second that wisdom is always good. Sometimes I think it's better to have people out of the area because they don't have the same emotion clouding the situation at hand
3 likes   
Alicia, Rita, Ike, Harvey and Beryl...moved to Splendora lol

craptacular
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 581
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:17 pm
Location: The Mad City, WI

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9784 Postby craptacular » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:09 pm

Last VDM from hurricane hunters only reported one larger eye now:
L. Eye Character: Closed
M. Eye Shape & Diameter: Circular with a diameter of 48 nautical miles (55 statute miles)
0 likes   

User avatar
Uhoh13
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:03 am
Location: Kansas/Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9785 Postby Uhoh13 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:10 pm

ncweatherwizard wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:
kpost wrote:
This would be an amazing forum, especially if lurkers were allowed to read but not comment.

We have a subforum where only pro-mets and approved amateurs can post...it's called "Tropical Analysis" and you can access it from this ATL forum (its at the top). But no one really uses it...because 90% of members can't post there.

This is a discussion thread for EVERYONE to use, regardless of skill level. Cutting out the majority of users would be completely against everything this site has been about and built itself on over the years.


There used to be something like that, but it wasn't really frequented all that much. I don't really come on here much anymore, but I prefer just having things the way they are now. I can cut through the BS pretty easily, and I enjoy answering questions when I can.[/quote

I'm a newb! But this is a forum, but there needs to be a little patience for us al roker wanna be's, just saying, we're not all stupid, and we're trying to learn. :D
2 likes   

User avatar
Andrew92
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3247
Age: 41
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9786 Postby Andrew92 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:11 pm

ncweatherwizard wrote:
Andrew92 wrote:According to NCWeatherWizard's definition and the latest advisory at 11 PM EDT, Matthew needs to be within 60 miles of Florida (hurricane winds extend 60 miles out). As of the latest position update that just came out, Matthew is 60 miles east of Fort Pierce.

Matthew is therefore very close to counting as a Florida hit as a hurricane, if not already, if I am understanding everything correctly.

-Andrew92


Not quite. It needs to be within a radius of maximum wind. So that's still, I don't know, about 20-30 miles out just eyeballing it.


OK, now I get it. I just overlooked the maximum wind portion of the explanation. Thanks a lot!

Personally, with the continued northwest track, and being what appears to be about 10 miles closer to the coast at midnight than at 11 PM, I think it will get close enough to count a couple hours after I go to bed or so. It mathematically would be sooner I think if Matthew continues on a straight line, but I am trying to account for any wobbles that might take place. (I will be up for probably two more hours, living out west.)

-Andrew92
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9787 Postby Steve » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:11 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:Stick your thumb or paper or something over the inner eyewall and watch the progression of the western eyewall. Dont be decived


You'd think, right? It's clear. I'm still of the opinion that various models were tracking various vortices to come up with the divergent solutions. Eye may parallel for while and may never completely landfall, but the motion has been identifiable.
1 likes   

MaineWeatherNut
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9788 Postby MaineWeatherNut » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:11 pm

craptacular wrote:Last VDM from hurricane hunters only reported one larger eye now:
L. Eye Character: Closed
M. Eye Shape & Diameter: Circular with a diameter of 48 nautical miles (55 statute miles)


With it being more then 50% gone now they must not consider it a Eyewall anymore.
0 likes   
The content of this post does NOT constitute official forecast and should not be used as such. They are the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or Storm2K. For official information, please refer to the local meteorological centers of respective areas.

stephen23
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:57 pm
Location: North Fort Worth

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9789 Postby stephen23 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:11 pm

Looks to be 45 miles of coast
Last edited by stephen23 on Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

crm6360

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9790 Postby crm6360 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:12 pm

ncweatherwizard wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:
kpost wrote:
This would be an amazing forum, especially if lurkers were allowed to read but not comment.

We have a subforum where only pro-mets and approved amateurs can post...it's called "Tropical Analysis" and you can access it from this ATL forum (its at the top). But no one really uses it...because 90% of members can't post there.

This is a discussion thread for EVERYONE to use, regardless of skill level. Cutting out the majority of users would be completely against everything this site has been about and built itself on over the years.


There used to be something like that, but it wasn't really frequented all that much. I don't really come on here much anymore, but I prefer just having things the way they are now. I can cut through the BS pretty easily, and I enjoy answering questions when I can.

I'm all for users asking questions. What I don't like are amateurs giving their opinion as fact, especially when it's often transparent that they are just -removed-.
0 likes   

ncweatherwizard
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1243
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:45 am
Location: Ft. Collins, CO

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9791 Postby ncweatherwizard » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:13 pm

In the recent north to south transect, the outer eyewall has higher flight level winds on both sides of the core. The surface wind is quite a bit more complicated. I wouldn't say the EWRC is near completion because the inner eyewall remains very intense, but the cycle is definitely progressing.

On a related note, I wonder if the double pressure minimum (http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/recon/re ... series.png) is real or if it had something to do with the flight path.
0 likes   

craptacular
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 581
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:17 pm
Location: The Mad City, WI

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9792 Postby craptacular » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:15 pm

ncweatherwizard wrote:On a related note, I wonder if the double pressure minimum (http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/recon/re ... series.png) is real or if it had something to do with the flight path.


They did a counterclockwise loop on the last pass through the eye.
Last edited by craptacular on Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

stephen23
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:57 pm
Location: North Fort Worth

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9793 Postby stephen23 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:15 pm

Image
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9794 Postby Alyono » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:15 pm

ncweatherwizard wrote:In the recent north to south transect, the outer eyewall has higher flight level winds on both sides of the core. The surface wind is quite a bit more complicated. I wouldn't say the EWRC is near completion because the inner eyewall remains very intense, but the cycle is definitely progressing.

On a related note, I wonder if the double pressure minimum (http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/recon/re ... series.png) is real or if it had something to do with the flight path.


flight path
0 likes   

bjackrian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 156
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:41 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9795 Postby bjackrian » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:15 pm

54kt gust at Vero Beach, sustained at 34kt.

KVRB 070402Z AUTO 35034G54KT 1 1/2SM +RA BR BKN014 BKN022 OVC027 26/24 A2935 RMK AO2 PK WND 35054/0402
0 likes   

Lifeless
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 8:28 am
Location: Extra-Tropical-London, UK

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9796 Postby Lifeless » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:16 pm

ncweatherwizard wrote:In the recent north to south transect, the outer eyewall has higher flight level winds on both sides of the core. The surface wind is quite a bit more complicated. I wouldn't say the EWRC is near completion because the inner eyewall remains very intense, but the cycle is definitely progressing.

On a related note, I wonder if the double pressure minimum (http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/recon/re ... series.png) is real or if it had something to do with the flight path.


The recon data shows it going in a loop near the eyewall, perhaps something to do with that flight movement?
0 likes   
Disclaimer: I am by no means even remotely a professional meteorologist, I'm just a Brit interested in tropical weather in the Atlantic. Always refer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) or National Weather Service (NWS) for professional advice.

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3352
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9797 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:16 pm

craptacular wrote:Last VDM from hurricane hunters only reported one larger eye now:
L. Eye Character: Closed
M. Eye Shape & Diameter: Circular with a diameter of 48 nautical miles (55 statute miles)


Major development. The previous VDM only reported a 12 nautical mile eye.
0 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9798 Postby Sanibel » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:16 pm

That inner eyewall better not landfall because if it hits a river mouth it will ram surge with that one good band.
Last edited by Sanibel on Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

ncweatherwizard
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1243
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:45 am
Location: Ft. Collins, CO

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9799 Postby ncweatherwizard » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:16 pm

craptacular wrote:
ncweatherwizard wrote:On a related note, I wonder if the double pressure minimum (http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/recon/re ... series.png) is real or if it had something to do with the flight path.


They did a counterclockwise loop on the last pass through the eye.


Ok. That makes sense. Thanks!
0 likes   

User avatar
Uhoh13
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:03 am
Location: Kansas/Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9800 Postby Uhoh13 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:19 pm

So I'll pose this question again. If Matt and Nicole meet can they marry? Or is it more like trump and Rosie? Seriously, can they join or will the repel each other like two spinning tops coming together?
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests