ronyan wrote:Just curious why has the NHC not labeled this potential TC at this point?
Because it's not close enough for watches to be issued.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
ronyan wrote:Just curious why has the NHC not labeled this potential TC at this point?
ronyan wrote:Just curious why has the NHC not labeled this potential TC at this point?
ronyan wrote:Just curious why has the NHC not labeled this potential TC at this point?
SoupBone wrote:Can someone explain how it's possible for a system to not only maintain a TS as far north as San Antonio, but strengthen as well? Does this not seem incredibly absurd to anyone else?
RL3AO wrote:ronyan wrote:Just curious why has the NHC not labeled this potential TC at this point?
Because it's not close enough for watches to be issued.
gatorcane wrote:NEXSTAT provides a good SAT imagery loop. Looks to be organizing:
https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/nexsat-bin/ ... PE=Instant
TheStormExpert wrote:Like hd44 said RH seems to be lacking some probably in thanks to that ULL in the NW Gulf. This is why convection is limited at best.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests