ATL: HARVEY - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
Since this is the leftovers from Harvey, does this become Harvey if it forms again? And I'm surprised it's not tagged as an Invest yet? Or will it skip the Invest stage since it is the remnants of a former storm?
1 likes
- tropicwatch
- Category 5
- Posts: 3387
- Age: 61
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
- Location: Panama City Florida
- Contact:
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
Does confirm circulation is under convection, now it just needs the low to close.
[quote="panamatropicwatch"]Latest WindSat:
[/quoteD
[quote="panamatropicwatch"]Latest WindSat:

1 likes
Tropicwatch
Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'
Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:37 pm
- Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
ConvergenceZone wrote:Since this is the leftovers from Harvey, does this become Harvey if it forms again? And I'm surprised it's not tagged as an Invest yet? Or will it skip the Invest stage since it is the remnants of a former storm?
Yes.
0 likes
- HurricaneBrain
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:07 pm
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
And the center of that convection looks to be about 50-75 miles NNE of the latest marine surface plot.
panamatropicwatch wrote:Does confirm circulation is under convection, now it just needs the low to close.
Last edited by HurricaneBrain on Tue Aug 22, 2017 10:18 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
HurricaneBrain wrote:And the center of that convection looks to be about 50-75 miles NNE of the latest marine surface plot.panamatropicwatch wrote:Does confirm circulation is under convection, now it just needs the low to close.
I remember someone pointing that out as the spot earlier

1 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- HurricaneBrain
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:07 pm
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
X is roughly where the latest plot is, and I'm seeing a closing center further north, anyone else agree?


1 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
And if the center is in fact organizing there (50-75 miles NNE of what was expected), I think it increases the chances for a landfall farther north and east. Its what I've been saying. If true, lets wait for this to be inputed into models.
1 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
I have it roughly in that position where the X is above...
whats scary is it is not wasting any time in consolidating a center. I mean it just moved of the Yuc geezz
whats scary is it is not wasting any time in consolidating a center. I mean it just moved of the Yuc geezz
3 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
Possible that 92l and Harvey hook up - center forms between them - central gulf. ULL may help the cause
Not a pro
Not a pro
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
its pretty apparent that northern vort/circ I mentioned earlier developed and took over quite rapidly. convective pattern has improved quite a bit.
which by the way is north of all the models intialized positions. models likely to shift towards eastern texas now.
which by the way is north of all the models intialized positions. models likely to shift towards eastern texas now.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:37 pm
- Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:its pretty apparent that northern vort/circ I mentioned earlier developed and took over quite rapidly. convective pattern has improved quite a bit.
which by the way is north of all the models intialized positions. models likely to shift towards eastern texas now.
I am in eastern Texas. What do you thing our rain count will be?
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
sphelps8681 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:its pretty apparent that northern vort/circ I mentioned earlier developed and took over quite rapidly. convective pattern has improved quite a bit.
which by the way is north of all the models intialized positions. models likely to shift towards eastern texas now.
I am in eastern Texas. What do you thing our rain count will be?
That is tough to say for anyone. depending on what model you look at currently. its not good either way. always best to just prepare for the worst and hope for the best.
the eratic motion in some of the models is concerning. lets just hope it does not make landfal, stall, then move back over water organize again and well you know... not good.
1 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:37 pm
- Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:sphelps8681 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:its pretty apparent that northern vort/circ I mentioned earlier developed and took over quite rapidly. convective pattern has improved quite a bit.
which by the way is north of all the models intialized positions. models likely to shift towards eastern texas now.
I am in eastern Texas. What do you thing our rain count will be?
That is tough to say for anyone. depending on what model you look at currently. its not good either way. always best to just prepare for the worst and hope for the best.
the eratic motion in some of the models is concerning. lets just hope it does not make landfal, stall, then move back over water organize again and well you know... not good.
Went through Rita and Ike. Home is not flood prone and stock up today on supplies. I am ready!!
1 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
One quick observation, the current shear is a LOT higher than the models are analyzing. SHIPS had about 5 kts. It's more like 15, but will soon decrease
1 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
So as soon as it closes it off it will be minimum 45 Kt TS.
1 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
Alyono wrote:One quick observation, the current shear is a LOT higher than the models are analyzing. SHIPS had about 5 kts. It's more like 15, but will soon decrease
Eh 15 is not bad..probably of that ULL next to it
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1753
- Age: 25
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
- Location: Jupiter, FL
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
ROCK wrote:Alyono wrote:One quick observation, the current shear is a LOT higher than the models are analyzing. SHIPS had about 5 kts. It's more like 15, but will soon decrease
Eh 15 is not bad..probably of that ULL next to it
Not enough to kill it unfortunately
1 likes
- Hurricaneman
- Category 5
- Posts: 7351
- Age: 45
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
- Location: central florida
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
With winds like that on the windsat this may already be a tropical storm with 50mph winds, if so imo this is already stronger than any model has this up to this point which gets me increasingly worried
2 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Remnants - Discussion
Got a good anticyclone over head but yeah the ULL not in the best position currently..25knoys of shear close to it.
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/w ... oom=&time=
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/w ... oom=&time=
1 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests