ATL: HARVEY - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
sphelps8681
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 785
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:37 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1681 Postby sphelps8681 » Tue Aug 22, 2017 8:51 pm

Frank P wrote:
sphelps8681 wrote:
Digital-TC-Chaser wrote:http://fltwx.db.erau.edu/get_loop.php?&cnt=27&dir=model_erau/NAM/FLLWS/US/

http://fltwx.db.erau.edu/get_loop.php?& ... AM/FPW/US/


Looks a tad further north.

Look further north and a hint of a N or NNE component at the very end of the run... that run looks like a Galveston impact :D


Yes I see!! Definitely a a more N/NNE move there.
0 likes   

weatherguy425
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX > Lubbock, TX > Savannah, GA
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1682 Postby weatherguy425 » Tue Aug 22, 2017 8:57 pm

sphelps8681 wrote:
Frank P wrote:
sphelps8681 wrote:
Looks a tad further north.

Look further north and a hint of a N or NNE component at the very end of the run... that run looks like a Galveston impact :D


Yes I see!! Definitely a a more N/NNE move there.



*Be careful* judging perceived motion with variables such as PWATS, Wind; especially with a system that has modeled structure changes through the course of the run.
0 likes   

Craters
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 421
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:34 pm
Location: Alvin, TX (south of Houston)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1683 Postby Craters » Tue Aug 22, 2017 8:57 pm

Alyono wrote:
Because the model does not start running until after 21z.

Also gfs uses a 3dvar based system that maps all obs to the starting model time


Ah! Okay -- thank you!
0 likes   
Nothing that I post here should ever be treated as a forecast or anything resembling one. Please check with your local NWS office or the NHC for forecasts, watches, and warnings.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1684 Postby Steve » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:13 pm

NAM 12km is out to 24 hours and organizing, 1004mb and probably a bit NW of where I thought it would be in 24 hours. CAVEAT: Best Track was around 20N so it's 5 degrees to far south to even pretend like it's any good. But it's the only game in town now.


https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=708
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10152
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1685 Postby Blown Away » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:16 pm

Nearly all the 00z intensity models do not take Ex Harvey to Hurricane...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1686 Postby Steve » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:17 pm

Okay it loops it down there a couple times buying time. Too out of range imho
0 likes   

Thetxhurricanemaster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Age: 34
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
Location: Corpus christi

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1687 Postby Thetxhurricanemaster » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:18 pm

Steve wrote:NAM 12km is out to 24 hours and organizing, 1004mb and probably a bit NW of where I thought it would be in 24 hours. CAVEAT: Best Track was around 20N so it's 5 degrees to far south to even pretend like it's any good. But it's the only game in town now.


https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=708

This run is more reasonable and it has the data fed into it from the NOAA missions today !
0 likes   

User avatar
mcheer23
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 436
Age: 32
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:24 pm
Location: Sugar Land, Texas

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1688 Postby mcheer23 » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:25 pm

00Z Nam so far is further north
0 likes   

User avatar
msp
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 4:58 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1689 Postby msp » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:30 pm

Both 12km and 32km NAM are stronger and further north than 18z
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1690 Postby lrak » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:30 pm

If you look at the new 200mb Vorticity - North Atlantic Map it shows a new ULL low in the BOC. I wonder if this is going to steer it between the two?
0 likes   
AKA karl

Also
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts on this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. My posts are my basic observations and are definitely not backed by any "well some" meteorological knowledge. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145510
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1691 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:30 pm

@EricBlake12
All G-IV dropsondes should be in the 00z models, along w/special soundings across the South- time to watch for any #Harvey model shifts


 https://twitter.com/EricBlake12/status/900163038866804736


3 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1692 Postby stormlover2013 » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:43 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 42
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1693 Postby Hammy » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:50 pm

I think we can toss the NAM intensity forecast.
1 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
jason1912
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 8:24 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1694 Postby jason1912 » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:51 pm

Hopefully that 3KM NAM forecast is wrong :eek:
2 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4229
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1695 Postby South Texas Storms » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:51 pm

Hammy wrote:I think we can toss the NAM intensity forecast.


And it's track. Has it heading towards Louisiana without a landfall in Texas at the end of the run. Only model to show that.
0 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1696 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:52 pm

Let us all hope and pray that the NAM does not verify. Heading toward LA at the end as a very strong hurricane. Kind of stalled out off the Texas coastline. :eek:
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1697 Postby stormlover2013 » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:52 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1698 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:53 pm

Hammy wrote:I think we can toss the NAM intensity forecast.



Why? I see the 3km is showing something crazy, but 32km not so much. At least in my opinion.
1 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
HurricaneBrain
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:07 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1699 Postby HurricaneBrain » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:55 pm

Question is, did that gulfstream jet data have a factor in the NAM running further north? And will it have the same effect on 0z GFS?
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1700 Postby Steve » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:56 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=nam&region=watl&pkg=mslp_pcpn&runtime=2017082300&fh=69&xpos=0&ypos=140


The 3km resolution is the best one in my opinion. And it cuts off south of 25N. So it stalls it and loops it around because it's out of range. Crazy enough it's down to like the 920s and nowhere near land. I think that's a throw away. Because there is no reason that wouldn't get to Cat 4 or 5 the way it's going with the run. I seriously doubt (hope) that isn't the way this is going to go and don't buy it. Unless I'm dead wrong, it's a great teaching example of why you can't look at the NAM that far south. I'm not fully against the ideas of a hit up closer to Galveston from the lower res runs, but globals and time will have to convince me.

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... =0&ypos=10
Last edited by Steve on Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests