ATL: IRMA - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4030
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
Is it me or is this about to miss the 18z forecast point to its North? It stopped its WSW motion...moving due West.
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
- Hurricane Andrew
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1891
- Age: 26
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
- Location: KS
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
She looks kinda sick this morning...inner core undisturbed, but outer convection dying from dry air.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... imated.gif
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... imated.gif
0 likes
The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd
Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)
"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War
- 1900hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 6059
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
mike2kt wrote:1900hurricane wrote:Looks like the dry air wrap has advanced even further into the circulation than it was yesterday.
https://i.imgur.com/4zZ7ruJ.jpg?1
I'm a bit confused, how do you get that's dry air from a scale that shows temperature?
Lower PW air emits higher brightness temperatures. It can make it confusing in the presence of convection if you don't know what you're looking for. You can cross-compare the 89 GHz brightness temperatures to the derived PWs in the updated post to see how they relate to each other.
Last edited by 1900hurricane on Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
**Edit: A bit after posting this analysis, I realized I had an error in it that makes it flat out wrong. For my follow up posts detailing my error, please go to the next page of this thread.**
The 11AM NHC coordinates are 17.7N, 48.4W. That means that she is located to the south of all 50 0Z EPS members!! ALL of them are between 18N and 20.5N when at 48.4W. This is a very significant indicator and, therefore, I'm fully expecting further SW adjustments in the EPS mean and probably also in the more volatile Euro operational as well as general model consensus as we move forward. That means increased risks for the Leeward Islands, Virgin Islands, PR, and the entire NE Caribbean. This also means the risk for FL, Bahamas, Hispaniola (especially Dominican Republic), Cuba (especially eastern), and the US GOM coast is continuing to increase as the SW trends continue.
The 11AM NHC coordinates are 17.7N, 48.4W. That means that she is located to the south of all 50 0Z EPS members!! ALL of them are between 18N and 20.5N when at 48.4W. This is a very significant indicator and, therefore, I'm fully expecting further SW adjustments in the EPS mean and probably also in the more volatile Euro operational as well as general model consensus as we move forward. That means increased risks for the Leeward Islands, Virgin Islands, PR, and the entire NE Caribbean. This also means the risk for FL, Bahamas, Hispaniola (especially Dominican Republic), Cuba (especially eastern), and the US GOM coast is continuing to increase as the SW trends continue.
Last edited by LarryWx on Sun Sep 03, 2017 12:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
7 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Hurricane Andrew
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1891
- Age: 26
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
- Location: KS
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
Honestly she looks pretty sick to me RN, if recon were to fly in, I'd predict they would find a weak C2, not a C3. But I am no pro...
0 likes
The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd
Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)
"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War
- northjaxpro
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

2 likes
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!
________________________________________________________________________________________
Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019
________________________________________________________________________________________
Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019
- eastcoastFL
- Category 5
- Posts: 3901
- Age: 43
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
- Location: Palm City, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
AutoPenalti wrote:Is it me or is this about to miss the 18z forecast point to its North? It stopped its WSW motion...moving due West.
I don't see it. Still appears to be heading wsw to me.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
Notice that he was sure to include Houston in his cone? Nothing against Bastardi, but that was intentional.
1 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Hurricane Andrew
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1891
- Age: 26
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
- Location: KS
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
I mean...wouldn't the circulation be impinged if it travels that close to the Hispanola shredder?
0 likes
The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd
Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)
"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
SoupBone wrote:
Notice that he was sure to include Houston in his cone? Nothing against Bastardi, but that was intentional.
that was early on. the first of the four pics is the current synopsis.
0 likes
Robbielyn McCrary
I know just about enough to sound like I know what I'm talking about sometimes. But for your safety please follow the nhc for truly professional forecasting.
I know just about enough to sound like I know what I'm talking about sometimes. But for your safety please follow the nhc for truly professional forecasting.

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
eastcoastFL wrote:AutoPenalti wrote:Is it me or is this about to miss the 18z forecast point to its North? It stopped its WSW motion...moving due West.
I don't see it. Still appears to be heading wsw to me.
The clouds filled in the eye a bit, but it does appear to be moving more west than anything now if that continues it'll likely stop the south drift on the models (hoping at least, especially for the Caribbean islands).
Last edited by BobHarlem on Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:41 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes
- SFLcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 10163
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
- Location: Lake Worth Florida
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
LarryWx wrote:The 11AM NHC coordinates are 17.7N, 48.4W. That means that she is located to the south of all 50 0Z EPS members!! ALL of them are between 18N and 20.5N when at 48.4W. This is a very significant indicator and, therefore, I'm fully expecting further SW adjustments in the EPS mean and probably also in the more volatile Euro operational as well as general model consensus as we move forward. That means increased risks for the Leeward Islands, Virgin Islands, PR, and the entire NE Caribbean. This also means the risk for FL, Bahamas, Hispaniola (especially Dominican Republic), Cuba (especially eastern), and the US GOM coast is continuing to increase as the SW trends continue.
Not what I'd like to here but fantastic post!
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
robbielyn wrote:SoupBone wrote:Ken711 wrote:
Notice that he was sure to include Houston in his cone? Nothing against Bastardi, but that was intentional.
that was early on. the first of the four pics is the current synopsis.
It says "with diminishing weight", not that it isn't still a consideration. Am I missing something?
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Extratropical94
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 3538
- Age: 30
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
BobHarlem wrote:eastcoastFL wrote:AutoPenalti wrote:Is it me or is this about to miss the 18z forecast point to its North? It stopped its WSW motion...moving due West.
I don't see it. Still appears to be heading wsw to me.
The clouds filled in the eye a bit, but it does appear to be moving more west than anything now if that continues it'll likely stop the south drift on the models (hoping at least, especially for the Caribbean islands).
Looks like it. In the last frames you can see the eye getting closer to 18°N again.

0 likes
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel
- SouthDadeFish
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 2835
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
- Location: Miami, FL
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
LarryWx wrote:The 11AM NHC coordinates are 17.7N, 48.4W. That means that she is located to the south of all 50 0Z EPS members!! ALL of them are between 18N and 20.5N when at 48.4W. This is a very significant indicator and, therefore, I'm fully expecting further SW adjustments in the EPS mean and probably also in the more volatile Euro operational as well as general model consensus as we move forward. That means increased risks for the Leeward Islands, Virgin Islands, PR, and the entire NE Caribbean. This also means the risk for FL, Bahamas, Hispaniola (especially Dominican Republic), Cuba (especially eastern), and the US GOM coast is continuing to increase as the SW trends continue.
First of all, this likely belongs in the model thread, but regardless, I don't think this is correct. According to Brian Tang's page, verification looks to be well within the plume of 00Z ensembles. What information did you use to make this analysis?
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
NHC did not mention dry air intrusions for today. Do not believe it will affect the overall structure.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
The eye wall replacement cycle wobbled Irma SW some of that motion was actually modeled.
Still hoping it goes north of todays 18Z forecast point.
Still hoping it goes north of todays 18Z forecast point.
1 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion
Been busy most of the weekend so I've only occasionally checked the models. Watching closely in Raleigh and plan on getting some supplies to deal with potential power outages in the next day or two. Don't plan on dealing with a potential last minute rush.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests