ATL: IRMA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1801 Postby AutoPenalti » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:12 am

Is it me or is this about to miss the 18z forecast point to its North? It stopped its WSW motion...moving due West.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1802 Postby Ken711 » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:15 am

0 likes   

Raebie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1803 Postby Raebie » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:15 am

First recon flight is at 5 PM today, correct?
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1804 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:16 am

She looks kinda sick this morning...inner core undisturbed, but outer convection dying from dry air.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... imated.gif
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1805 Postby 1900hurricane » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:16 am

mike2kt wrote:
1900hurricane wrote:Looks like the dry air wrap has advanced even further into the circulation than it was yesterday.

https://i.imgur.com/4zZ7ruJ.jpg?1


I'm a bit confused, how do you get that's dry air from a scale that shows temperature?

Lower PW air emits higher brightness temperatures. It can make it confusing in the presence of convection if you don't know what you're looking for. You can cross-compare the 89 GHz brightness temperatures to the derived PWs in the updated post to see how they relate to each other.
Last edited by 1900hurricane on Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6326
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1806 Postby LarryWx » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:17 am

**Edit: A bit after posting this analysis, I realized I had an error in it that makes it flat out wrong. For my follow up posts detailing my error, please go to the next page of this thread.**

The 11AM NHC coordinates are 17.7N, 48.4W. That means that she is located to the south of all 50 0Z EPS members!! ALL of them are between 18N and 20.5N when at 48.4W. This is a very significant indicator and, therefore, I'm fully expecting further SW adjustments in the EPS mean and probably also in the more volatile Euro operational as well as general model consensus as we move forward. That means increased risks for the Leeward Islands, Virgin Islands, PR, and the entire NE Caribbean. This also means the risk for FL, Bahamas, Hispaniola (especially Dominican Republic), Cuba (especially eastern), and the US GOM coast is continuing to increase as the SW trends continue.
Last edited by LarryWx on Sun Sep 03, 2017 12:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
7 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1807 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:25 am

Honestly she looks pretty sick to me RN, if recon were to fly in, I'd predict they would find a weak C2, not a C3. But I am no pro...
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1808 Postby northjaxpro » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:25 am

:uarrow: Excellent analysis Larry! You're on top of it. A very significant southward miss at 48.4 longitude as indicated in that post. Yeah, there will be likely continued subtle shifts of the models as time progresses.
2 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3901
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1809 Postby eastcoastFL » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:29 am

AutoPenalti wrote:Is it me or is this about to miss the 18z forecast point to its North? It stopped its WSW motion...moving due West.


I don't see it. Still appears to be heading wsw to me.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1810 Postby SoupBone » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:31 am




Notice that he was sure to include Houston in his cone? Nothing against Bastardi, but that was intentional.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1811 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:32 am

I mean...wouldn't the circulation be impinged if it travels that close to the Hispanola shredder?
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
robbielyn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1298
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 9:45 am
Location: brooksville, fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1812 Postby robbielyn » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:35 am

SoupBone wrote:



Notice that he was sure to include Houston in his cone? Nothing against Bastardi, but that was intentional.

that was early on. the first of the four pics is the current synopsis.
0 likes   
Robbielyn McCrary
I know just about enough to sound like I know what I'm talking about sometimes. But for your safety please follow the nhc for truly professional forecasting. :D

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2128
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1813 Postby BobHarlem » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:36 am

eastcoastFL wrote:
AutoPenalti wrote:Is it me or is this about to miss the 18z forecast point to its North? It stopped its WSW motion...moving due West.


I don't see it. Still appears to be heading wsw to me.


The clouds filled in the eye a bit, but it does appear to be moving more west than anything now if that continues it'll likely stop the south drift on the models (hoping at least, especially for the Caribbean islands).
Last edited by BobHarlem on Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:41 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1814 Postby SFLcane » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:37 am

LarryWx wrote:The 11AM NHC coordinates are 17.7N, 48.4W. That means that she is located to the south of all 50 0Z EPS members!! ALL of them are between 18N and 20.5N when at 48.4W. This is a very significant indicator and, therefore, I'm fully expecting further SW adjustments in the EPS mean and probably also in the more volatile Euro operational as well as general model consensus as we move forward. That means increased risks for the Leeward Islands, Virgin Islands, PR, and the entire NE Caribbean. This also means the risk for FL, Bahamas, Hispaniola (especially Dominican Republic), Cuba (especially eastern), and the US GOM coast is continuing to increase as the SW trends continue.


Not what I'd like to here but fantastic post!
0 likes   

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1815 Postby SoupBone » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:39 am

robbielyn wrote:
SoupBone wrote:
Ken711 wrote:



Notice that he was sure to include Houston in his cone? Nothing against Bastardi, but that was intentional.

that was early on. the first of the four pics is the current synopsis.


It says "with diminishing weight", not that it isn't still a consideration. Am I missing something?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1816 Postby Extratropical94 » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:44 am

BobHarlem wrote:
eastcoastFL wrote:
AutoPenalti wrote:Is it me or is this about to miss the 18z forecast point to its North? It stopped its WSW motion...moving due West.


I don't see it. Still appears to be heading wsw to me.


The clouds filled in the eye a bit, but it does appear to be moving more west than anything now if that continues it'll likely stop the south drift on the models (hoping at least, especially for the Caribbean islands).


Looks like it. In the last frames you can see the eye getting closer to 18°N again.

Image
0 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1817 Postby SouthDadeFish » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:46 am

LarryWx wrote:The 11AM NHC coordinates are 17.7N, 48.4W. That means that she is located to the south of all 50 0Z EPS members!! ALL of them are between 18N and 20.5N when at 48.4W. This is a very significant indicator and, therefore, I'm fully expecting further SW adjustments in the EPS mean and probably also in the more volatile Euro operational as well as general model consensus as we move forward. That means increased risks for the Leeward Islands, Virgin Islands, PR, and the entire NE Caribbean. This also means the risk for FL, Bahamas, Hispaniola (especially Dominican Republic), Cuba (especially eastern), and the US GOM coast is continuing to increase as the SW trends continue.


First of all, this likely belongs in the model thread, but regardless, I don't think this is correct. According to Brian Tang's page, verification looks to be well within the plume of 00Z ensembles. What information did you use to make this analysis?
0 likes   

User avatar
MetroMike
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 952
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:13 pm
Location: Tampa Bay
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1818 Postby MetroMike » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:46 am

NHC did not mention dry air intrusions for today. Do not believe it will affect the overall structure.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5305
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1819 Postby Nimbus » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:50 am

The eye wall replacement cycle wobbled Irma SW some of that motion was actually modeled.
Still hoping it goes north of todays 18Z forecast point.
1 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1820 Postby RL3AO » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:51 am

Been busy most of the weekend so I've only occasionally checked the models. Watching closely in Raleigh and plan on getting some supplies to deal with potential power outages in the next day or two. Don't plan on dealing with a potential last minute rush.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests