ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1961 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:49 am

shaneomac wrote:
CourierPR wrote:At 192 doesn't it appear that the trough is retrograding? I don't think this goes OTS.



Perhaps Maine hit again ? going to be interesting to watch unfold , figured the euro was to far south with the gom scenario . still long ways out for a consensus

Could just be a freak run also. You never know.
1 likes   

User avatar
CourierPR
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1335
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1962 Postby CourierPR » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:51 am

AutoPenalti wrote:
bamajammer4eva wrote:
CourierPR wrote:At 192 doesn't it appear that the trough is retrograding? I don't think this goes OTS.


Yeah its not retrograding west its just lifting as is the high so wouldn't steering just be gone??

A major might be driven by the mean flow in this case right?


I always think about how strong storms can pump the ridge.
1 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1963 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:51 am

Image
0 likes   

Langinbang187

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1964 Postby Langinbang187 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:51 am

That's a real decent shift N with Euro.
1 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10152
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1965 Postby Blown Away » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:51 am

Huge shift NE from 00z Euro at 216...
1 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1966 Postby Alyono » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:52 am

huge trough this time off of the east coast instead of a huge ridge
2 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1967 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:53 am

Alyono wrote:huge trough this time off of the east coast instead of a huge ridge

I'm glad this run showed this. It lets us see the two paths this could take depending on if the trough gets cut off or not.
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1968 Postby AutoPenalti » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:54 am

This is one run but maybe the GFS was right all along...

Maybe it's a freak run.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1969 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:56 am

AutoPenalti wrote:This is one run but maybe the GFS was right all along...

Maybe it's a freak run.

Who knows anymore? lol Back to square one tomorrow.
0 likes   

shaneomac
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:19 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1970 Postby shaneomac » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:57 am

AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
AutoPenalti wrote:This is one run but maybe the GFS was right all along...

Maybe it's a freak run.

Who knows anymore? lol Back to square one tomorrow.

Looks kinda consensus with the other models , mind you the ggem had the gom track tonight which is a red flag there lol
0 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1971 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:57 am

Either gets pushed into land or follows the NARROW ally out to sea.
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1972 Postby Bocadude85 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:57 am

AutoPenalti wrote:This is one run but maybe the GFS was right all along...

Maybe it's a freak run.


I think it's more of the two models coming together. Let's see if the 12Z run shows this or if it goes back to cutting the trough off. I remember the Euro had a fluke run or two with Harvey before going back to its original idea.
1 likes   

Langinbang187

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1973 Postby Langinbang187 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:58 am

Euro keeps it moving slow. Could still be a threat to the Mid Atlantic or The Canadian Maritimes if that run verified.
Last edited by Langinbang187 on Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1974 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:58 am

Full Euro run
Image
0 likes   

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1975 Postby SunnyThoughts » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:59 am

Hopefully this is a trend, and she will push out to sea.
3 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1976 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:00 am

SunnyThoughts wrote:Hopefully this is a trend, and she will push out to sea.

Islands and Bahamas would still get a piece of this if this run was reality. But yes a trend farther to the north would be nice.
0 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1977 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:02 am

EC was showing no trof over the se 12hrs ago refer to other early posts. GFS-CMC have been onto the trof anom from the getgo.. Wont be surprised to see the next ec run clear the islands if it picks up the microwave trof as per tvcn.
2 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1978 Postby wxmann_91 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:03 am

A couple of observations:

1) Models do have a tendency to erroneously cut off lows at the longer ranges (remember Matthew?). The Euro corrects this in tonight's run, and we see the result.

2) The ensembles in the longer ranges do hint at above-average heights building at the higher latitudes -- somewhere between Quebec and Newfoundland -- after the East Coast trof lifts out. If true, this has the *possibility* to prevent OTS recurvature of Irma in the very long ranges (assuming she's in the position between the US and Bermuda). Euro != auto-recurve. It also means that a slower Irma has a higher chance of impacting the U.S. That said, this is *very* preliminary and all subject to change. Nothing has changed in today's runs.
Last edited by wxmann_91 on Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:04 am, edited 2 times in total.
1 likes   

T'Bonz
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 421
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 5:23 pm
Location: Cary, North Carolina

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1979 Postby T'Bonz » Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:04 am

240 Euro was almost the same position as the 204 GFS. Just a bit west, but at the same latitude.

Interesting.
1 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1980 Postby AJC3 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:05 am

This far ahead of any potential impacts for the US (day 9+), how the individual operation global model runs trend toward each other is far, far less important the the broad overall trend over the course of a few days. This far out, folks who don't already do so really need to be looking a lot more at the model ensemble means, the various consenses, and their trends, rather than focusing on each 6-and 12-hourly model runs.

And to reiterate, the yammering about explicit operational model solutions out past a week "caving" to one another is well and truly pointless. And it goes without saying, as the mods and admins have repeatedly stressed, when and if thread deteriorate into "model war" mode, PMs will be sent and warnings issues as needed.

Carry on...
8 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 166 guests