ATL: IRMA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
weathaguyry
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1272
Age: 22
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:16 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2201 Postby weathaguyry » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:49 pm

Any chance that if it does move NE with the trough, could the high take over and move it back west? Not saying this will happen, but I'm just curious as to what would happen
0 likes   
My posts are only my opinions and NOT official forecasts. For official forecasts, consult the National Hurricane Center or the National Weather Service.

Irene 11', Sandy 12', Fay 20’, Isaias 20’, Elsa 21’, Henri 21’, Ida 21’

Snowman67
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 633
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:44 pm
Location: Tomball, TX

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2202 Postby Snowman67 » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:49 pm

LarryWx wrote:
jdjaguar wrote:
LarryWx wrote:From met. Dave Tolleris ("DT") today: some hilarious lines about the strength of Irma being repeatedly shown by the GFS:

"The 0z SATURDAY operational GFS model continues to be well ...close to worthless piece of crap. I say this because I cannot follow or comprehend why anybody would follow a the model which consistent produces run after run the most extreme outlandish hurricane intensities ever seen the western hemisphere. Run after run the operational GFS model continues to show the most severe intense hurricane of all time in the Bahamas and then slamming into Southeast as category 5 sometime around September 10."

"Once again the operational GFS model remains firmly entrenched on the idea of a historic record shattering extreme hurricane a massive as portions slamming into the southeastern U.S.. The model continues or hurricane stronger than hurricane Gilbert in 1988 as it approaches the South Carolina North Carolina Wilmington area. This is essentially unchanged from last few model runs."

http://www.wxrisk.com/sunday-sept-3-upd ... to-se-usa/

What do you find hilarious?
Records can and are broken.

I hope I can laugh in 8 days

Not laughing at the moment.


I find DT to be funny in general, especially because he rants along with numerous typos in his writeups. Have you ever read or heard him? Also, I do think he has a very valid point about the ridiculously low pressures being shown on the GFS. They have been WAY lower than anything on record that''s ever occurred near the SE coast. Do you really believe them? I don't. Yes, the signal is for an extremely strong storm of cat 4 to possibly an unprecedented in some areas cat 5. But do you really believe the recent runs showing pressures in the 880s just off NC/SC? That's like 50+ mb stronger than anything else on record in that area! Hazel had 938 mb and it was moving very fast..


It's almost as crazy as the models that showed parts of SE Texas getting over 50 inches of rain with Hurricane Harvey. Oh wait, we did...
0 likes   
Any forecast I make is based on my opinion only. Please refer to the NWS or NHC for official forecasts.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11503
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2203 Postby GCANE » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:50 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2204 Postby fci » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:51 pm

gatorcane wrote:Getting somewhat concerning here in SE Florida watching these models. But have been here before where models try to obliterate us about 6-7 days out and then once you get inside 3-4 days they have gradually shifted off us. Ike is a good example. Looked like a shoe-in hit but models kept shifting past us to the south. Not saying we will get so lucky yet again but we will know more in a few days once the system is in the vicinity of Puerto Rico and NE Leewards.

All attention should be on the islands at this point as the margin for error with the consensus model tracks is razor thin as far as core hurricane fore winds impacting the islands or something less, maybe a brush. Time to start watching every wobble.


Since I am a slave to climatology/history (whichever suits me better, LOL); I see Ike (almost exactly the same time 9 years ago) or Floyd here. I do not want to see Frances or Jeanne!
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2205 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:51 pm

You dont see that too often.. latest satellite is showing a the larger eye trying to clear out while.. what looks like an older midlevel circ lagging behind. This is clearly lopsided due to the ne shear. Its likely going to push this farther south than forecast.. ..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3900
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2206 Postby eastcoastFL » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:52 pm

Latest track graphics, data and coordinates from the Navy:
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/tcweb/cgi-bi ... 92W.INVEST,

They have the best graphics of the cone and map IMO.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2207 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:54 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:You dont see that too often.. latest satellite is showing a the larger eye trying to clear out while.. what looks like an older midlevel circ lagging behind. This is clearly lopsided due to the ne shear. Its likely going to push this farther south than forecast.. ..

I'm not seeing that..?
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2208 Postby GeneratorPower » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:55 pm

Blinhart wrote:
GeneratorPower wrote:
tgenius wrote:What I have to imagine is tomorrow at some point, (could be 11am or 5pm) but SFL will be in that 5 day cone. I'm praying the storm lifts, but reality is its been 12 years since a storm in SFL, and the unfortunate reality is you can only be lucky for so long. :/


South FL will not be in the cone in my estimation. The NHC will either slow the system down or adjust the track to the right to prevent that. They won't put FL on alert unless they're reasonably sure it will happen. Seen it many times.


definitively disagree with this statement.


Let's test my assertion. If you see that cone undeservedly avoiding Miami-Dade you'll know for sure.
0 likes   

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3900
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2209 Postby eastcoastFL » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:56 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
eastcoastFL wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:The horses in ocala would be running for the barn for sure..


Ocala might be my fall back spot. I'm on the coast in Martin county. Ocala would have to be safer for us.
You and blown away can carpool to the mountains of ocala...although heading south could end up.better...who knows


Good point maybe I'll make a key largo trip instead
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145710
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: IRMA - Recon Discussion Thread

#2210 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:56 pm

@TropicalATL
#Irma loop from @NOAA_HurrHunter's lower fuselage radar on WP-3D Orion aircraft. 3:24pm to 9:04pm AST. 5pm AST NHC track. (Credit: NOAA-AOC)


 https://twitter.com/TropicalATL/status/904517748885217280


2 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2211 Postby Blinhart » Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:00 pm

eastcoastFL wrote:Latest track graphics, data and coordinates from the Navy:
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/tcweb/cgi-bi ... 92W.INVEST,

They have the best graphics of the cone and map IMO.


If you look at that map, Miami is already in it.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3900
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2212 Postby eastcoastFL » Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:00 pm

GeneratorPower wrote:
Blinhart wrote:
GeneratorPower wrote:
South FL will not be in the cone in my estimation. The NHC will either slow the system down or adjust the track to the right to prevent that. They won't put FL on alert unless they're reasonably sure it will happen. Seen it many times.


definitively disagree with this statement.


Let's test my assertion. If you see that cone undeservedly avoiding Miami-Dade you'll know for sure.



I doubt the NHC will make up a track or change the speed simply to spare Florida from preparation. The backlash if they didn't do that would be much worse. We've been in many cones that didn't land here.

The naval site already has the Florida coast line in their cone: https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/tcweb/cgi-bi ... 92W.INVEST,
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3900
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2213 Postby eastcoastFL » Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:02 pm

Blinhart wrote:
eastcoastFL wrote:Latest track graphics, data and coordinates from the Navy:
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/tcweb/cgi-bi ... 92W.INVEST,

They have the best graphics of the cone and map IMO.


If you look at that map, Miami is already in it.


Yup. I just mentioned that in another post. It'll be deeper in it on the next update. Still plenty of time for changes but if you're off of work tomorrow I'd get some prepping out of the way. I did most of mine over the weekend just to not be amongst the herd when it gets closer.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2214 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:07 pm

The center is diving more wsw.. here are the last 3 recon fixes and you can see the eye clearing.. (a little old) already pretty much at 17n and diving.. this is very very important.

Image
2 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2215 Postby fci » Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:07 pm

GeneratorPower wrote:
Blinhart wrote:
GeneratorPower wrote:
South FL will not be in the cone in my estimation. The NHC will either slow the system down or adjust the track to the right to prevent that. They won't put FL on alert unless they're reasonably sure it will happen. Seen it many times.


definitively disagree with this statement.


Let's test my assertion. If you see that cone undeservedly avoiding Miami-Dade you'll know for sure.


I'm sorry but I just don't buy the conspiracy theory of areas avoiding the cone.
Didn't happen with Ike and I don't see it as realistic
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!

dexterlabio
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3470
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2216 Postby dexterlabio » Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:10 pm

LarryWx wrote:

Indeed, Dave has eaten many a word due to his always seeming to go out on a limb well in advance. He has had many major fails amongst his successes. I'm not a fan of him for accuracy as a result. He's very much a hit or miss forecaster. And I don't at all agree with throwing the GFS out just because of the extremely low pressures. But one thing I think he's right about is that the 880s pressures being shown just off SC/NC are going to verify as having been way too low should Irma happen to go that way (hopefully it will stay offshore, regardless). The lowest on record there is 938 mb (Hazel of 1954). What's the lowest I could see offshore SC/NC should a very strong Irma go near there? Realistically, around 920 mb and that's probably overdone and would be absolutely devastating there.



I agree with Larry. Since the GFS upgrade, we've seen this model showing sub-900 howlers in mid-latitude regions. We saw this one happened with a few typhoons that were forecast to hit Japan earlier this year. Not saying Irma won't become a Cat5 for a moment, but an 880mb system that north and close to the east coast is something else.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2217 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:12 pm

Hello pinhole eye...I expect to see significant strengthening over the next 12-24 hours...24/7 recon presence will be helpful.
1 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

BucMan2
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 10:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2218 Postby BucMan2 » Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:13 pm

Aric- hope you are well- please explain why the dive wsw
Is vey important and what implications on the track might it have moving forward? Thank you
0 likes   

User avatar
CourierPR
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1335
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2219 Postby CourierPR » Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:13 pm

fci wrote:
GeneratorPower wrote:
Blinhart wrote:
definitively disagree with this statement.


Let's test my assertion. If you see that cone undeservedly avoiding Miami-Dade you'll know for sure.


I'm sorry but I just don't buy the conspiracy theory of areas avoiding the cone.
Didn't happen with Ike and I don't see it as realistic


I recall when Floyd was headed for So. FL. the NHC Director, Jerry Jarrell said that even though they were thinking the storm would turn, they had to issue hurricane warnings because the risk was too great.
1 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2220 Postby AutoPenalti » Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:13 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:The center is diving more wsw.. here are the last 3 recon fixes and you can see the eye clearing.. (a little old) already pretty much at 17n and diving.. this is very very important.

Image

About to miss the forecast point to the south I think.
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests