ATL: IRMA - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- SouthFLTropics
- Category 5

- Posts: 4258
- Age: 50
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
- Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
0 likes
Fourth Generation Florida Native
Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24
Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Cunxi Huang wrote:This is a dramatic change from 18z GFS ensemble. Most members agree a landfall.
Yep...most ensembles are now South Carolina and points south..not a good trend if you are in Florida
Last edited by caneseddy on Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
The ensembles are showing increasing likelihood of a CONUS hit. We wait and watch.
0 likes
- Ivanhater
- Storm2k Moderator

- Posts: 11165
- Age: 38
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
- Location: Pensacola
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Most show a continued wnw heading indicating we may see some further SW shifts in the future with a stronger high moving into place
2 likes
Michael
-
curtadams
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
- Location: Orange, California
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Not quite. There's *one* member landfalling near NYC and a couple more scattered about in odd places. The operational is certainly an atypical member, but it's not entirely out of the spread.1900hurricane wrote:It's interesting to see the GEFS spread considerably to the southwest in the medium range when compared to the operational run. The GEFS envelope is generally thought to be a little under-dispersive in many cases, but the operational run isn't even in the envelope.
1 likes
- 1900hurricane
- Category 5

- Posts: 6063
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
curtadams wrote:Not quite. There's *one* member landfalling near NYC and a couple more scattered about in odd places. The operational is certainly an atypical member, but it's not entirely out of the spread.1900hurricane wrote:It's interesting to see the GEFS spread considerably to the southwest in the medium range when compared to the operational run. The GEFS envelope is generally thought to be a little under-dispersive in many cases, but the operational run isn't even in the envelope.
Well, kind of. That one member with a similar track is much slower than the operational run. By 12Z September 10 (tau 210), there are no members remotely close to the operational run.


0 likes
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
-
stormreader
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
AxaltaRacing24 wrote:The one thing that I am concerned about is that no matter how powerful the windshield wiping is, we still have our 3 best models showing landfalls, which is the last thing this country needs.
Not going out to sea. Personally, I'm ruling out the Outer Banks and points north. So don't think it will even be close to going out to sea. Still possible it approaches SE coast and makes a strong NW jog toward the Cape Fear, NC area, but that's about as far north as I think it would go. So broad area for me is Cape Fear, NC down to the coast of Cuba. See how that plays out for a couple of days. If that looks to verify, then further refine it then.
1 likes
-
Dean4Storms
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Anything beyond 5 days is subject to big changes with any model or ensemble. Just an extrapolation of the slightest track or speed change now can make hundreds of miles difference out 6-10 days. A difference of hitting Florida to New England in this situation right now.
0 likes
-
TheStormExpert
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
So should we be expecting a westward shift on the 00z GFS run showing a Florida landfall? 
0 likes
-
stormreader
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Ivanhater wrote:Most show a continued wnw heading indicating we may see some further SW shifts in the future with a stronger high moving into place
Very possible.
0 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 23703
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
TheStormExpert wrote:So should we be expecting a westward shift on the 00z GFS run showing a Florida landfall?
Yes I think we will see a significant west shift. Often times the ensembles gives clues on what the next OP run will do. Yikes that is some ensemble run.
Last edited by gatorcane on Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
-
Langinbang187
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Hybridstorm_November2001 wrote:Hurricane Andrew wrote:Langinbang187 wrote:Definitely favoring the Euro setup here. That ridge over Atlantic Canada looks comically overdone.
On the contrary, the trough or amount of cutoffing could be overdone as well.
Keep in mind we've had roughly two weeks of clear, cool weather from the last ridge up here, so the next one could be a monster too.
We haven't had a "monster ridge" in Nova Scotia all Summer. I'm not banking on it.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
1900hurricane wrote:curtadams wrote:Not quite. There's *one* member landfalling near NYC and a couple more scattered about in odd places. The operational is certainly an atypical member, but it's not entirely out of the spread.1900hurricane wrote:It's interesting to see the GEFS spread considerably to the southwest in the medium range when compared to the operational run. The GEFS envelope is generally thought to be a little under-dispersive in many cases, but the operational run isn't even in the envelope.
Well, kind of. That one member with a similar track is much slower than the operational run. By 12Z September 10 (tau 210), there are no members remotely close to the operational run.
Oh, I REALLY don't like this image!
Except that would bring us NE winds....which is the only good part. I wouldn't have to worry about the one tree I'm worried would fall in a storm. NE winds will take it down away from the house!
0 likes
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022, Milton - 2024
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
ColdMiser123 wrote:Blown Away wrote:ColdMiser123 wrote:The GEFS have a ridiculous signal into Florida at 18z.
Can you post image?
Had to do a double take when I first ran through this on WSI.
Yeah, I saw this. Looks like Charley again.
I don't want to go through that again! But preps are just about done, so...now we wait.
0 likes
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022, Milton - 2024
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Holy Hannah, did you see the strength of those members striking SE FL? I think they were all cat 5.
1 likes
-
TheStormExpert
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
gatorcane wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:So should we be expecting a westward shift on the 00z GFS run showing a Florida landfall?
Yes I think we will see a significant west shift. Often times the ensembles gives clues on what the next OP run will do. Yikes that is some ensemble run.
Yeah starting to think that MAYBE unfortunately the models are starting to come in-line with Irma getting blocked and forced west into the U.S. likely somewhere along the SE U.S. coastline including Florida.
0 likes
-
otowntiger
- Category 5

- Posts: 1932
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
yeah the Euro did do well with Harvey like you say, only 3-4 days out. How did it do 8-9 days out?ROCK wrote:Steve wrote:Landfall is is 8 1/2 days from 18z today which means the storm hits NYC Sunday morning at 1am. 8 1/2 days is a long time in the model world but inside of model "fantasy land". And I'd caution everyone that the GFS and European haven't exactly been good in the mid-range which is what we'll be in throughout the labor day weekend. Unless all tracks come into agreement, don't expect to see the real solution, unless one accidentally hits it, before next Tuesday when we get inside of 5 days.
IDK Steve the EURO was pretty good with Harv around 3-4 days. It was the first model to throw out the wacky mid TX coast hit then bounced back to MX then back up the coast. Probably the reason the NHC is weighing so heavily on it this year. By far it has out performed the GFS as we all know...I also like the UKMET model this year...Not bad squirrely has the others. JMO
0 likes
-
jlauderdal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
the recurve idea east of the bahamas sure did die a quick death..Cunxi Huang wrote:This is a dramatic change from 18z GFS ensemble. Most members agree a landfall.
0 likes
-
hurricaneCW
- Category 5

- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
- Location: Toms River, NJ
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
You can speculate all you want but none of it is legit because it's 8+ days out. I can't even take these runs seriously until Irma is near the islands.
As far as I know all options remain on the table.
As far as I know all options remain on the table.
6 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests





