ATL: HARVEY - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
MaineWeatherNut
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3001 Postby MaineWeatherNut » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:05 am

BYG Jacob wrote:
Hurricaneman wrote:Recon confirms an erc going on

Where did it confirm an EWRC


It confirmed Concentric Eyewalls of 10nm and 20nm.
0 likes   
The content of this post does NOT constitute official forecast and should not be used as such. They are the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or Storm2K. For official information, please refer to the local meteorological centers of respective areas.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3002 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:08 am

MaineWeatherNut wrote:
BYG Jacob wrote:
Hurricaneman wrote:Recon confirms an erc going on

Where did it confirm an EWRC


It confirmed Concentric Eyewalls of 10nm and 20nm.


those are not concentric eyewalls.. depending and the flight path.. they flew through two curved bands.. concentric would be in all quads.
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

BYG Jacob

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3003 Postby BYG Jacob » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:08 am

MaineWeatherNut wrote:
BYG Jacob wrote:
Hurricaneman wrote:Recon confirms an erc going on

Where did it confirm an EWRC


It confirmed Concentric Eyewalls of 10nm and 20nm.

I don't think so.
Last edited by BYG Jacob on Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Exalt
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:55 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3004 Postby Exalt » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:08 am

storm_in_a_teacup wrote:
1900hurricane wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
If the eye clears out there with the CDO remaining the same, that would be T6.0?

Depends on what you mean by cleared out. A clear eye is probably at least off-white if not warm medium grey. The color shades of the CDO drop off pretty sharp, so there is some room for error there, but at the moment I'd probably embed in light grey, with the black and white shades just missing width requirements (eye number 5.0 for LG). OW eye with W ring gets a 0.5 eye adjustment and a WMG eye with W ring gets me a 1.0 eye adjustment, yielding 5.5 and 6.0, respectively. Add 0.5 to each if B meets width requirements and 1.0 if W does.


What do the B, OW, W, and WMG stand for? I guess I'm just wondering where we can find out about these Dvorak ratings. The only experience I have with Dvorak is the keyboard layout.


WMG, or warm medium grey, is indication of a warm eye (a signal of an intensifying tropical cyclone).
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5850
Age: 42
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3005 Postby Hammy » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:08 am

MaineWeatherNut wrote:
BYG Jacob wrote:
Hurricaneman wrote:Recon confirms an erc going on

Where did it confirm an EWRC


It confirmed Concentric Eyewalls of 10nm and 20nm.


Will that halt intensification?
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

MaineWeatherNut
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3006 Postby MaineWeatherNut » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:09 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
MaineWeatherNut wrote:
BYG Jacob wrote:Where did it confirm an EWRC


It confirmed Concentric Eyewalls of 10nm and 20nm.


those are not concentric eyewalls.. depending and the flight path.. they flew through two curved bands.. lol


Latest Airforce Recon VDM:

L. OPEN SE
M. CO10-20

Edit: Actually that's the latest NOAA VDM
Last edited by MaineWeatherNut on Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
The content of this post does NOT constitute official forecast and should not be used as such. They are the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or Storm2K. For official information, please refer to the local meteorological centers of respective areas.

stephen23
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:57 pm
Location: North Fort Worth

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3007 Postby stephen23 » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:09 am

chaser1 wrote:Pin the Pressure on the Donkey time lol, anyone's guess on lowest (GOM) pressure that Harvey achieves? I"m going to guess 937mb, but filling a bit prior to landfall.


I'm wondering why you think pressure will come up some prior to landfall. I saw what you wrote earlier about upwelling. But, from what I have heard about this particular area the warm water extends deeper then usual and upwelling in this area just feeds more warm water.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3008 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:10 am

wkwally wrote:I have a strong feeling that by the time I wake up it could be a cat 3 But just my guess and I am not a pro met.


Just on eye balling not looking at data i suspect you would find 90kt plus in the core
its a very small area with max speed.
0 likes   

Exalt
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:55 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3009 Postby Exalt » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:10 am

Hammy wrote:
MaineWeatherNut wrote:
BYG Jacob wrote:Where did it confirm an EWRC


It confirmed Concentric Eyewalls of 10nm and 20nm.


Will that halt intensification?


IMO this never really had a completely constructed eyewall to begin with due to curved banding (ala the ragged presentation earlier this evening), and is now finishing building a larger eyewall in tandem with intensifying. I'm not a pro-met but if it's handling intensification during an EWRC like it is now, it should be fine.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9488
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3010 Postby ROCK » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:10 am

EWRC going on? That means the expansion of the wind field after it's done...basically he is juicing now..awesome
2 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3011 Postby txwatcher91 » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:11 am

If it’s truly developing a second eyewall then that will expand the size and wind field of the system. Will have to wait and see if that continues, it’s unusual to see an EWRC in a cat 1 or 2 storm.
0 likes   

BYG Jacob

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3012 Postby BYG Jacob » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:12 am

ROCK wrote:EWRC going on? That means the expansion of the wind field after it's done...basically he is juicing now..awesome

That would be really bad this far out, like, really bad.
2 likes   

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2131
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Bermuda

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3013 Postby Kazmit » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:12 am

This only has to strengthen 10kts to become a major... and it has 24 hours to do so.
1 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3014 Postby Blinhart » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:12 am

I think tomorrow here in Louisiana they will doing voluntary evacuation of the upper part of Cameron Parish and all of Vermillion Parish, and then if it looks like it will be at minimum a Cat 1 around the SW coast of Louisiana they will upgrade it to mandatory on Saturday or Sunday, and voluntary in Jeff Davis, Acadia, and Calcasieu Parishes, now if it is going to be stronger there will be more mandatory according to their storm surge predictions. I know in the past where I live it is Cat 4 or higher it is mandatory yet 1 mile south of where I live it is Cat 3 and 10 miles south it is Cat 2.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Bizzles
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 473
Age: 39
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:22 am
Location: Columbus, NJ

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3015 Postby Bizzles » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:13 am

txwatcher91 wrote:If it’s truly developing a second eyewall then that will expand the size and wind field of the system. Will have to wait and see if that continues, it’s unusual to see an EWRC in a cat 1 or 2 storm.

Maybe an indication that it is strengthening very rapidly.
0 likes   
Andrew '92 Opal '95 Blizzard '96 Izzy '03 Irene '11 Sandy '12

The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion is not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Exalt
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:55 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3016 Postby Exalt » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:13 am

stephen23 wrote:
chaser1 wrote:Pin the Pressure on the Donkey time lol, anyone's guess on lowest (GOM) pressure that Harvey achieves? I"m going to guess 937mb, but filling a bit prior to landfall.


I'm wondering why you think pressure will come up some prior to landfall. I saw what you wrote earlier about upwelling. But, from what I have heard about this particular area the warm water extends deeper then usual and upwelling in this area just feeds more warm water.


The Gulf tends to have dry air right up at the coast that usually causes most landfalling cyclones to drop a slight amount in intensity prior to landfall (most prominent example being Katrina), also just simple interaction with landmasses can cause cyclones to have a disruption in intensification or cause a drop in strength.

Although from what I've seen conditions look fair for Harvey.
0 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3017 Postby 1900hurricane » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:14 am

storm_in_a_teacup wrote:
1900hurricane wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
If the eye clears out there with the CDO remaining the same, that would be T6.0?

Depends on what you mean by cleared out. A clear eye is probably at least off-white if not warm medium grey. The color shades of the CDO drop off pretty sharp, so there is some room for error there, but at the moment I'd probably embed in light grey, with the black and white shades just missing width requirements (eye number 5.0 for LG). OW eye with W ring gets a 0.5 eye adjustment and a WMG eye with W ring gets me a 1.0 eye adjustment, yielding 5.5 and 6.0, respectively. Add 0.5 to each if B meets width requirements and 1.0 if W does.


What do the B, OW, W, and WMG stand for? I guess I'm just wondering where we can find out about these Dvorak ratings. The only experience I have with Dvorak is the keyboard layout.

They are all abbreviations for color shades on the Basic Dvorak enhanced infrared color curve. B is black, OW is off-white, W is white, and WMG is warm medium grey. More on the Dvorak Technique can be found here.
1 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9488
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3018 Postby ROCK » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:14 am

Um Where the H is Steve?
Talk me off he ledge bro!!
Last edited by ROCK on Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

BRweather
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:50 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3019 Postby BRweather » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:14 am

ECMWF will be running in a little over 30 minutes.

So far it has been giving the most logical outcome in my opinion. Also the most consistent.

Very curious to see if it budges, but after seeing the 00Z NAM with the upper-level dropsonde information and how it mimicked the 12z ECMWF, I do not know why it would change now.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3020 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:15 am

MaineWeatherNut wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
MaineWeatherNut wrote:
It confirmed Concentric Eyewalls of 10nm and 20nm.


those are not concentric eyewalls.. depending and the flight path.. they flew through two curved bands.. lol


Latest Airforce Recon VDM:

L. OPEN SE
M. CO10-20

Edit: Actually that's the latest NOAA VDM


if a ERC has started this early something forced it. the dynamics for a ERC dont occur until a mature pressure gradient exists. I highly doubt that is what is happening. likely just a misinterpretation.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests