ATL: IRMA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
KBBOCA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:27 am
Location: Formerly Boca Raton, often West Africa. Currently Charlotte NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7081 Postby KBBOCA » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:38 pm

Latest update from NWS Key West.

Extreme wind threat.
Extreme storm surge threat.

Image

 https://twitter.com/NWSKeyWest/status/905933005759414272


0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7082 Postby Steve » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:38 pm

superdeluxe wrote:Is it a bit irresponsible for this promet to be posting this?

it feels a bit hyperbolic

@RyanMaue
Based on size of Hurricane #Irma + Category 4/5 landfall winds/surge & track up I-75 to Atlanta, are we contemplating a Trillion $ disaster?


Wing nut and hype media. He should be better than that. Call attention to the storm, not click bait for your Twitter. Trillion dollars is beyond preposterous.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7083 Postby Extratropical94 » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:38 pm

917.8 extrapolated, but keep in mind that we've already had 7 mb errors with these readings.
Last edited by Extratropical94 on Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7084 Postby Michele B » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:39 pm

KBBOCA wrote:
superdeluxe wrote:Is it a bit irresponsible for this promet to be posting this?

it feels a bit hyperbolic

@RyanMaue
Based on size of Hurricane #Irma + Category 4/5 landfall winds/surge & track up I-75 to Atlanta, are we contemplating a Trillion $ disaster?


Yes, I quibble a lot with Ryan Maue's tweets. Most of his info is sound, but he does go for the sensationalist approach at times. Sadly with Irma, most of his sensationalism early on proved right on target, so I've downplayed my criticism of him.

But I agree with you, this latest tweet seems over done.


Jury's still out. He may be right on this one.
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9155
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Main Recon Thread (Data only)

#7085 Postby Sciencerocks » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:39 pm

000
URNT15 KNHC 072336
AF309 1811A IRMA HDOB 18 20170907
232630 2052N 07125W 6967 02842 9658 +131 +089 209088 090 091 010 00
232700 2053N 07126W 6963 02823 9626 +142 +090 212093 094 091 007 00
232730 2054N 07128W 6964 02799 9593 +151 +087 213097 099 089 007 00
232800 2055N 07129W 6969 02776 9585 +137 +090 213101 103 086 003 00
232830 2056N 07131W 6965 02754 9559 +136 +087 212104 105 087 000 00
232900 2057N 07132W 6967 02724 9524 +142 +082 212109 110 088 000 00
232930 2058N 07133W 6966 02690 9477 +151 +081 212114 116 093 000 03
233000 2100N 07135W 6965 02650 9430 +152 +096 214116 117 097 000 00
233030 2101N 07136W 6965 02597 9382 +144 +103 213120 120 100 002 00
233100 2102N 07137W 6957 02545 9341 +120 +116 211109 120 102 004 00
233130 2103N 07139W 6975 02479 9276 +138 +111 213083 097 100 003 03
233200 2104N 07140W 6961 02461 9219 +164 +112 213060 074 077 004 00
233230 2105N 07142W 6970 02435 9188 +180 +103 213037 052 054 002 00
233300 2106N 07144W 6966 02429 9187 +172 +106 217016 030 031 001 03
233330 2107N 07145W 7006 02371 9178 +176 +106 217001 011 019 000 00
233400 2108N 07147W 6957 02432 9178 +171 +101 060010 014 016 001 00
233430 2109N 07148W 6967 02420 9187 +164 +109 056018 021 019 002 00
233500 2111N 07149W 6965 02429 9195 +161 +109 063027 030 029 002 00
233530 2112N 07151W 6964 02439 9203 +160 +107 064037 041 034 002 00
233600 2113N 07152W 6969 02444 9219 +158 +101 056047 051 045 001 00
$$
;

This part of the eye wall appears to be quite weak! Only cat3 winds.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7086 Postby NDG » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:40 pm

SE quadrant definitely weaker but that's where is missing an inner eyewall, pressure remains low.

232930 2058N 07133W 6966 02690 9477 +151 +081 212114 116 093 000 03
233000 2100N 07135W 6965 02650 9430 +152 +096 214116 117 097 000 00
233030 2101N 07136W 6965 02597 9382 +144 +103 213120 120 100 002 00
233100 2102N 07137W 6957 02545 9341 +120 +116 211109 120 102 004 00
233130 2103N 07139W 6975 02479 9276 +138 +111 213083 097 100 003 03
233200 2104N 07140W 6961 02461 9219 +164 +112 213060 074 077 004 00
233230 2105N 07142W 6970 02435 9188 +180 +103 213037 052 054 002 00
233300 2106N 07144W 6966 02429 9187 +172 +106 217016 030 031 001 03
233330 2107N 07145W 7006 02371 9178 +176 +106 217001 011 019 000 00
233400 2108N 07147W 6957 02432 9178 +171 +101 060010 014 016 001 00
233430 2109N 07148W 6967 02420 9187 +164 +109 056018 021 019 002 00
233500 2111N 07149W 6965 02429 9195 +161 +109 063027 030 029 002 00
233530 2112N 07151W 6964 02439 9203 +160 +107 064037 041 034 002 00
1 likes   

User avatar
SEASON_CANCELED
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 887
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:17 am
Location: 8 Bit Charlie Sheen

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7087 Postby SEASON_CANCELED » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:40 pm

Evil Jeremy wrote:
SEASON_CANCELED wrote:turnpike is overwhelmed. would advise to use back roads


I love the back roads for evacuations. Used them to get far from Jacksonville/Matthew last year (and back). They're generally empty, more peaceful, and you get to see new sights.



There are (going by drudge) thousands of cars abandoned because they ran out of gas on the pike

Not confirmed
0 likes   
i am a big stupid ugly moron with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt stinks and i like to kiss my own butt

User avatar
SkeetoBite
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 515
Age: 59
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 8:25 am
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7088 Postby SkeetoBite » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:40 pm

KBBOCA wrote:
KBBOCA wrote:
Zarniwoop wrote:If it goes up the spine, Orlando wouldn't get devastating winds would it? We just moved from there and have a fair number of friends I need to start working on if this is predicted to hold together bizarrely well over land.



So, I think you should be prepared for significant winds in Orlando. NHC graphic to follow as soon as I find it.


Here's the latest windspeed probabilities from NHC.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/text/refresh/MI ... 2058.shtml

If I'm reading it correctly, 63% cumulative percent chance of sustained winds of 58 MPH; 42% cumulative probability of winds 74 MPH.

Also, look at your forecast office (Melbourne FL). They have a graphical weather forecast which shows you the risks ahead. It takes a bit of playing with to figure out, but here's Sunday night wind gusts:
https://graphical.weather.gov/sectors/mlb.php

For Sunday night, gusts in Orlando could reach 89 knots (102 MPH)!

Image


To make these images more useful; convert KTS to MPH by Multiplying knots by 1.151
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7089 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:41 pm

pressure is down a few mB for sure.. need the dropsonde though..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15984
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7090 Postby Kingarabian » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:41 pm

Doesn't look like a cat.5 anymore. I know it's the weaker side but the winds are barely 120kts -- unless im missing something.
Last edited by Kingarabian on Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
AdamFirst
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2491
Age: 36
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:54 am
Location: Port Saint Lucie, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7091 Postby AdamFirst » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:41 pm

Sitting back and watching some football, as this is probably one of the last normal days we got.

Gotta help prep my job tomorrow for the storm.
2 likes   
Dolphins Marlins Canes Golden Panthers HEAT
Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Wilma 2005 - Fay 2008 - Isaac 2012 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Dorian 2019 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022 - Milton 2024

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7092 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:41 pm

For those who don't want to evacuate: you may not get help from the north for several days.

Florida is a peninsula. With the only land routes to the north, they will have to come that way. Problem is that the storm is going in that direction and will remain dangerous at least through Monday or Tuesday. FEMA and private aid will NOT drive through hurricane conditions, so that means outside help may not come until midweek even if they wanted to help sooner.

I'd suggest having at least 7-10 days worth of supplies if staying back, not just 72 hours.
2 likes   

facemane
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 1:36 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7093 Postby facemane » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:42 pm

Kingslayer1254 wrote:Can someone please explain to me how this system is to turn right .. I mean can something this big just hit the brakes and turn right??


Absolutely it can. A strong cyclone tends to move poleward. A blocking high pressure ridge to the north is the reason they move west or northwest in the Atlantic basin. If the ridge get's weakened,the storm will seek it out and move more north.
2 likes   

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7094 Postby Extratropical94 » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:42 pm

NDG wrote:SE quadrant definitely weaker but that's where is missing an inner eyewall, pressure remains low.

232930 2058N 07133W 6966 02690 9477 +151 +081 212114 116 093 000 03
233000 2100N 07135W 6965 02650 9430 +152 +096 214116 117 097 000 00
233030 2101N 07136W 6965 02597 9382 +144 +103 213120 120 100 002 00
233100 2102N 07137W 6957 02545 9341 +120 +116 211109 120 102 004 00
233130 2103N 07139W 6975 02479 9276 +138 +111 213083 097 100 003 03
233200 2104N 07140W 6961 02461 9219 +164 +112 213060 074 077 004 00
233230 2105N 07142W 6970 02435 9188 +180 +103 213037 052 054 002 00
233300 2106N 07144W 6966 02429 9187 +172 +106 217016 030 031 001 03
233330 2107N 07145W 7006 02371 9178 +176 +106 217001 011 019 000 00
233400 2108N 07147W 6957 02432 9178 +171 +101 060010 014 016 001 00
233430 2109N 07148W 6967 02420 9187 +164 +109 056018 021 019 002 00
233500 2111N 07149W 6965 02429 9195 +161 +109 063027 030 029 002 00
233530 2112N 07151W 6964 02439 9203 +160 +107 064037 041 034 002 00


The decayed part of the inner eyewall still has higher winds than the outer eyewall. Two wind maxima clearly visible on the last two datasets.
1 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7095 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:43 pm

very distinct double wind maximum.

Image
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7096 Postby 1900hurricane » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:44 pm

stormreader wrote:
1900hurricane wrote:Considering the current state of eyewall replacement, I still think we're 12-18 hours away from returning to a single eyewall with a clearing eye. The outer eyewall does appear to be gaining dominance on microwave imagery, but considering the large radius of the outer eyewall, it may take some time for it to fully kill of the inner eyewall.

I should also mention that eyewall replacement is still rather unpredictable, even as it is occurring. I've seen plenty of storms botch eyewall replacement for whatever reason and end up in a structural flux. I've also seen systems complete massive eyewall replacement projects in relatively short periods of time when I fully didn't expect it to even complete. Eyewall replacement has kicked my butt in the past, and I'm sure it will in the future. Whether it does here in this instance with Irma remains to be seen.

Putting you on the spot, an average time between ERC's for Cat 4's and 5's might be???? or is it something not that well understood?

I'd say about 24 hours, but it is something that has rather large variance. Some systems have pulled it off in as short a time as <12 hours, but there are others that can show little to no progression for multiple days and end up getting stuck with two relatively well formed concentric eyewall, which kills the pressure gradient in the core but also greatly increases wind radii. How to predict the duration of eyewall replacement ahead of time is a low skill affair though since there is still much we need to learn on the topic.
2 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

KBBOCA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:27 am
Location: Formerly Boca Raton, often West Africa. Currently Charlotte NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7097 Postby KBBOCA » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:44 pm

A good NPR article with a pretty detailed round up of devastation caused by Irma to the Northern Leewards, British & US Virgin Islands & Puerto Rico
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/ ... icane-irma

Thankfully the death toll seems to still be remarkably low given the immense physical destruction of so much property.
2 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7098 Postby NDG » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:45 pm

Kingarabian wrote:Doesn't look like a cat.5 anymore. I know it's the weaker side but the winds are barely 120kts -- unless im missing something.


The pressure has not gone up and it has not sampled the NW quadrant yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7099 Postby Steve » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:45 pm

Come on Michelle. Lets be serious. If it hits 100B, it will be one of only two storms in history though we are still counting Harvey. If it hits 175B, it will be the only one. So multiply that times six.

People believe anything nowadays.
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#7100 Postby hurricaneCW » Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:46 pm

Kingarabian wrote:Doesn't look like a cat.5 anymore. I know it's the weaker side but the winds are barely 120kts -- unless im missing something.


Perhaps it's weaker but pressure is still very low and the majority of models showed some weakening over the next 24 hrs before restrengthening in the straits.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests