ATL: IRMA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8021 Postby ronyan » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:08 pm

Extratropical94 wrote:
northjaxpro wrote:Storm2K site map shows at the moment Irma as Cat 5. So, is Irma back at Cat 5 strength officially?


That's likely some conversion error within the code behind the graphic. 135kt/155mph is Cat 4.


Yeah the straight conversion comes to about 155.25 so it may be just taking anything above 155 as cat 5. I do work with PHP so someone can send a PM if interested in getting that corrected.
Last edited by ronyan on Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

znel52

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8022 Postby znel52 » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:09 pm

dhweather wrote:
znel52 wrote:
Kenderkin17 wrote:So Irma is back to Cat. 5, and Jose is very very close to Cat 5 with many Cat 5 readings flagged from the most recent Recon. We may actually have two Cat 5 Hurricanes within the next few hours. It's a terrifying, amazing, and humbling all at the same time.


Irma stil a Cat 4 at 155. Has to be >157 for Cat 5. Minute difference but just the way the classification works.


Yes, I'd much rather be hit by an object doing 155mph than 157mph. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Practically the entire Florida peninsula is at risk here for hurricane force winds. There is a great deal of potential for widespread damage setting up here, and I hate it for everyone impacted. This will likely be a life changing event for many people.


Yeah that 2mph will get ya :wink:
3 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8023 Postby meriland29 » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:18 pm

Is this going from 150 to 155 the result of expected minor fluctuations or intensification due to EW reorganization? Curious..
0 likes   

BYG Jacob

Re: ATL: IRMA - Recon Discussion Thread

#8024 Postby BYG Jacob » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:18 pm

Extratropical94 wrote:Seems there is a problem with the recon data stream. No new updates from any of the five active planes for more than 15 minutes now.

Do you have a link to the livestream?
0 likes   

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Recon Discussion Thread

#8025 Postby Extratropical94 » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:19 pm

Blinhart wrote:How many different flights are there going on in Irma? Jose? Katia?


Previously today, 4 low-level and 1 upper-level. Right now there's just an upper-level NOAA mission on Irma that has just started.

The next departures are:
3pm EDT - NOAA low-level into IRMA
4:30pm EDT - USAF low-level into IRMA
4:45pm EDT - USAF low-level into JOSE
5pm EDT - USAF low-level into KATIA
0 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8026 Postby supercane4867 » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:21 pm

Irma should sweep through the Cuban coast tonight as satellite and recon passes both indicate a more westerly motion. However we can't overestimate the terrain effects since this part of Cuba is relatively flat and large storms tend to weaken slowly over land. That's why models rapidly intensifies Irma once she's off the coast again. I really don't expect much weakening tonight, let alone down to CAT2.
1 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11503
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8027 Postby GCANE » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:22 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
NC George
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 633
Age: 55
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:44 am
Location: Washington, NC, USA

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8028 Postby NC George » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:22 pm

bob rulz wrote:
Why haven't they opened up the other lanes to outbound traffic? They could keep 1 or 2 lanes of traffic open for any vehicles (mostly emergency/relief/supply vehicles) going the other direction.


Well, there's only 2 lanes going in each direction, so if they keep 2 lanes open going the other way, they just don't have contra-flow. I don't think having vehicles going opposite directions on the same side of the highway is a good idea.
0 likes   
Bertha '96, Fran '96, Bonnie '98, Dennis '99, Floyd '99 :eek: , Isabel '03, Irene '11, Matthew '16, Isaias '20, PTC16????

Avatar is heading into Florence 2018, moving friend's boat, only land between us and Hurricane Florence is Ocracoke Island!

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Recon Discussion Thread

#8029 Postby Extratropical94 » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:22 pm

BYG Jacob wrote:
Extratropical94 wrote:Seems there is a problem with the recon data stream. No new updates from any of the five active planes for more than 15 minutes now.

Do you have a link to the livestream?


Sorry, that was probably misleading, it's not a livestream. I meant the page where the recon data is shown as soon as it arrives from the planes.

http://tgftp.nws.noaa.gov/data/raw/ur/urnt15.knhc..txt for USAF missions

http://tgftp.nws.noaa.gov/data/raw/ur/urnt15.kwbc..txt for NOAA missions.
0 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

jdjaguar
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Jacksonville Beach, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8030 Postby jdjaguar » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:23 pm

Full8s wrote:
jdjaguar wrote:
Full8s wrote:I'm sure many of you have used this resource before, but for those who are inland like myself, and who are still anxiously following forecast wind speeds, this tabular forecast is very helpful:

http://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?w0=t&w1=td&w2=hi&w3=sfcwind&w3u=1&w4=sky&w5=pop&w6=rh&w7=rain&w8=thunder&w10u=0&w12u=1&w13u=1&AheadHour=0&FcstType=digital&textField1=28.3577&textField2=-82.6995&site=all&unit=0&dd=&bw=&AheadDay.x=60&AheadDay.y=6&AheadDay=48

Very useful. Thnx.

How do you plug in your location? Search box?


I did find it a bit cumbersome to navigate to this page, so I bookmarked it... but here's the path I took to get there:

forecast.weather.gov
enter zip code in top left box
select your location
scroll to the bottom of the page and find the heading "Additional Forecasts and Information"
select "tabular forecast"

Thanks!
2 likes   

Raebie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8031 Postby Raebie » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:24 pm

NC George wrote:
bob rulz wrote:
Why haven't they opened up the other lanes to outbound traffic? They could keep 1 or 2 lanes of traffic open for any vehicles (mostly emergency/relief/supply vehicles) going the other direction.


Well, there's only 2 lanes going in each direction, so if they keep 2 lanes open going the other way, they just don't have contra-flow. I don't think having vehicles going opposite directions on the same side of the highway is a good idea.


Especially since a good number of them are oil tankers. What could possibly go wrong?
1 likes   

User avatar
Meteorcane
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 559
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 6:49 am
Location: North Platte Nebraska

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8032 Postby Meteorcane » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:26 pm

ronyan wrote:
Extratropical94 wrote:
northjaxpro wrote:Storm2K site map shows at the moment Irma as Cat 5. So, is Irma back at Cat 5 strength officially?


That's likely some conversion error within the code behind the graphic. 135kt/155mph is Cat 4.


Yeah the straight conversion comes to about 155.25 so it may be just taking anything above 155 as cat 5. I do work with PHP so someone can send a PM if interested in getting that corrected.


I have also noticed the error with 130 mph being displayed as a Cat.4 on the above chart, that could be due to the fact they fairly recently changed the 3/4 threshold.
1 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8033 Postby bob rulz » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:28 pm

NC George wrote:
bob rulz wrote:
Why haven't they opened up the other lanes to outbound traffic? They could keep 1 or 2 lanes of traffic open for any vehicles (mostly emergency/relief/supply vehicles) going the other direction.


Well, there's only 2 lanes going in each direction, so if they keep 2 lanes open going the other way, they just don't have contra-flow. I don't think having vehicles going opposite directions on the same side of the highway is a good idea.


Hmm I was looking mainly later in the video when the traffic is going through the toll booths. Does it condense down to 2 lanes after that? If so, then forget what I said. And in hindsight, it is probably impractical to have only 1 lane going a certain direction. There aren't enough barriers in the world to divide entire freeway lanes of traffic up like that. Just a thought. I remember didn't they have contraflow travel on I-10 out of New Orleans before Katrina? Just wondering if it's practical to do so in Florida.
0 likes   

User avatar
Meteorcane
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 559
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 6:49 am
Location: North Platte Nebraska

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8034 Postby Meteorcane » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:30 pm

Meteorcane wrote:
ronyan wrote:
Extratropical94 wrote:
That's likely some conversion error within the code behind the graphic. 135kt/155mph is Cat 4.


Yeah the straight conversion comes to about 155.25 so it may be just taking anything above 155 as cat 5. I do work with PHP so someone can send a PM if interested in getting that corrected.


I have also noticed the error with 130 mph being displayed as a Cat.3 on the above chart, that could be due to the fact they fairly recently changed the 3/4 threshold.
0 likes   

BYG Jacob

Re: ATL: IRMA - Recon Discussion Thread

#8035 Postby BYG Jacob » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:30 pm

Extratropical94 wrote:
BYG Jacob wrote:
Extratropical94 wrote:Seems there is a problem with the recon data stream. No new updates from any of the five active planes for more than 15 minutes now.

Do you have a link to the livestream?


Sorry, that was probably misleading, it's not a livestream. I meant the page where the recon data is shown as soon as it arrives from the planes.

http://tgftp.nws.noaa.gov/data/raw/ur/urnt15.knhc..txt for USAF missions

http://tgftp.nws.noaa.gov/data/raw/ur/urnt15.kwbc..txt for NOAA missions.

Thanks!
0 likes   

JBCycloneStan
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 3:55 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8036 Postby JBCycloneStan » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:31 pm

Is everyone completely convinced of a Cuba landfall? People have pointed out the westerly direction as of late, but I've noticed a more WNW movement in the last few frames.

Also - people have been mentioning dry air from the mountains of hispanola and Cuba interfering with Irma's re-strengthening efforts. I haven't noticed any effect of dry air on the core though, so how convincing is this explanation really?
0 likes   

norva
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 10:41 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8037 Postby norva » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:32 pm

JBCycloneStan wrote:Is everyone completely convinced of a Cuba landfall? People have pointed out the westerly direction as of late, but I've noticed a more WNW movement in the last few frames.

Also - people have been mentioning dry air from the mountains of hispanola and Cuba interfering with Irma's re-strengthening efforts. I haven't noticed any effect of dry air on the core though, so how convincing is this explanation really?


I think it is expected to stay offshore, perhaps scrape the eye wall.
0 likes   

bordot
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 8
Age: 36
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 5:09 pm
Location: Las Vegas

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8038 Postby bordot » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:33 pm

NC George wrote:
bob rulz wrote:
Why haven't they opened up the other lanes to outbound traffic? They could keep 1 or 2 lanes of traffic open for any vehicles (mostly emergency/relief/supply vehicles) going the other direction.


Well, there's only 2 lanes going in each direction, so if they keep 2 lanes open going the other way, they just don't have contra-flow. I don't think having vehicles going opposite directions on the same side of the highway is a good idea.


I was stuck in gridlock during Hurricane Rita in Texas back in 2005 for over 30 hours before their contraflow plan was activated. If Florida's contraflow plan is anything similar to Texas', people going Southbound would only be allowed to drive on the feeder roads and not on the actual interstate. In my opinion, the benefits greatly outweigh the downsides - in those 30 hours I was in traffic, I moved maybe 15 miles in hot, humid Texas summer. It was one of the most miserable experiences in my life.
1 likes   

User avatar
Janie2006
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1329
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: coastal Ms aka home of the hurricanes

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8039 Postby Janie2006 » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:36 pm

Granted that it's the Florida peninsula and you only have x amount of space to work with, but don't folks take advantage of the highways, byways, and back roads? Knowing those has always been very, very handy in my experience. It pays to know the road system like the back of your hand.
1 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8040 Postby txwatcher91 » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:37 pm

JBCycloneStan wrote:Is everyone completely convinced of a Cuba landfall? People have pointed out the westerly direction as of late, but I've noticed a more WNW movement in the last few frames.

Also - people have been mentioning dry air from the mountains of hispanola and Cuba interfering with Irma's re-strengthening efforts. I haven't noticed any effect of dry air on the core though, so how convincing is this explanation really?


People often throw around the term "dry air" as the cause anytime a storm weakens or doesn't look as good as it once did when oftentimes there are other processes that cause the weakening or ragged appearance. I think Irma is just recovering from the EWRC and as soon as the inner eye fully gives up this will start looking really impressive. Cuba will probably have minimal effects as the eye is so large most of it would still be over water, and in some case, the frictional effects of land can help tighten up an eye after an EWRC.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests