ATL: IRMA - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
From that last GFS am I calculating correctly that tropical storm force winds for south east florida from Saturday at 6am to Monday at 10am ish?
Someone tell me I am way off please.
Someone tell me I am way off please.
0 likes
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5
- Posts: 4423
- Age: 43
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
The reality the GFS really isnt that far removed to the east...literally 50 miles maybe. The difference though in that 50 miles would be billions of dollars considering it would keep Irmas east quads off shore. Modeling is all but locked in in regards to FL impacts.
2 likes
GATOR NATION IS E V E R Y W H E R E !
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Also, CMC is about to make second landfall at 102 hours near to the Savannah River but probably on the SC side of the border. In the upper levels, CMC is now also faster with the trough existing the NE Coast and the high building in. This follows the NAM and GFS showing the stronger Canadian High Pressure building in that we've been talking about for a week.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=591
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=591
0 likes
- Evil Jeremy
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5463
- Age: 32
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
gatorcane wrote:Anybody have text UKMET?
12UTC 07.09.2017 20.0N 69.0W INTENSE
00UTC 08.09.2017 21.2N 71.7W INTENSE INTENSIFYING RAPIDLY
12UTC 08.09.2017 21.7N 74.5W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
00UTC 09.09.2017 22.0N 76.7W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
12UTC 09.09.2017 22.0N 78.7W INTENSE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
00UTC 10.09.2017 22.5N 80.1W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
12UTC 10.09.2017 23.3N 80.9W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
00UTC 11.09.2017 24.7N 81.1W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
12UTC 11.09.2017 26.7N 81.3W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
00UTC 12.09.2017 29.4N 81.1W INTENSE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
12UTC 12.09.2017 31.9N 81.3W STRONG WEAKENING SLIGHTLY
00UTC 13.09.2017 34.2N 81.3W MODERATE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
12UTC 13.09.2017 35.9N 80.8W MODERATE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
Track is very similar to 00z run.
1 likes
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Pughetime12 wrote:Steve wrote:Yeah, GFS is still probably too far east. It's got Irma near to coming in along the GA Coast at 96 hours (which is valid Monday at 7am). It's probably a little too deep and a little too far east still though the 2nd landfall point makes sense in its run and will probably be at least close.
If it comes in more west, wouldn't it come in further down in Georgia? With it getting pushed NW once it's in Georgia, I'm wondering if that would lessen some of the wind speeds in the coastal areas of GA/SC.
Possibly so. Sorry about the ambiguous post there. What I mean to say was that first landfall and inside of 80 hours would probably trend still west. The second landfall point looks as good as any. Assuming it does get back into the SE Atlantic, which I would agree with the NHC that it should, it could be anywhere along the SC/GA Coastline, my only beef is that since GFS is farther east earlier (more time over water), it deepens it probably more than it should before GA/SC Landfall. Hope that makes more sense.
0 likes
- Meteorcane
- Category 2
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 6:49 am
- Location: North Platte Nebraska
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
shawn6304 wrote:From that last GFS am I calculating correctly that tropical storm force winds for south east florida from Saturday at 6am to Monday at 10am ish?
Someone tell me I am way off please.
Looking at a point near Miami beach sustained tropical storm force winds on the GFS arrive around 11AM local on Saturday and ending late Sunday night/very early monday morning.
0 likes
- chris_fit
- Category 5
- Posts: 3255
- Age: 42
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
- Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Evil Jeremy wrote:gatorcane wrote:Anybody have text UKMET?
12UTC 07.09.2017 20.0N 69.0W INTENSE
00UTC 08.09.2017 21.2N 71.7W INTENSE INTENSIFYING RAPIDLY
12UTC 08.09.2017 21.7N 74.5W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
00UTC 09.09.2017 22.0N 76.7W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
12UTC 09.09.2017 22.0N 78.7W INTENSE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
00UTC 10.09.2017 22.5N 80.1W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
12UTC 10.09.2017 23.3N 80.9W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
00UTC 11.09.2017 24.7N 81.1W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
12UTC 11.09.2017 26.7N 81.3W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
00UTC 12.09.2017 29.4N 81.1W INTENSE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
12UTC 12.09.2017 31.9N 81.3W STRONG WEAKENING SLIGHTLY
00UTC 13.09.2017 34.2N 81.3W MODERATE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
12UTC 13.09.2017 35.9N 80.8W MODERATE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
Track is very similar to 00z run.
Eyeballing it, landfall around Marathon Key then up the spine - not sure if it's E/W of the 00Z
1 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Evil Jeremy wrote:gatorcane wrote:Anybody have text UKMET?
12UTC 07.09.2017 20.0N 69.0W INTENSE
00UTC 08.09.2017 21.2N 71.7W INTENSE INTENSIFYING RAPIDLY
12UTC 08.09.2017 21.7N 74.5W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
00UTC 09.09.2017 22.0N 76.7W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
12UTC 09.09.2017 22.0N 78.7W INTENSE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
00UTC 10.09.2017 22.5N 80.1W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
12UTC 10.09.2017 23.3N 80.9W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
00UTC 11.09.2017 24.7N 81.1W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
12UTC 11.09.2017 26.7N 81.3W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
00UTC 12.09.2017 29.4N 81.1W INTENSE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
12UTC 12.09.2017 31.9N 81.3W STRONG WEAKENING SLIGHTLY
00UTC 13.09.2017 34.2N 81.3W MODERATE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
12UTC 13.09.2017 35.9N 80.8W MODERATE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
Track is very similar to 00z run.
Well inland in Florida. Landfall at Big Pine Key, moves N-NW west of Lake O, and runs up straight thru Orlando.
2 likes
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5
- Posts: 4423
- Age: 43
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
ronjon wrote:Evil Jeremy wrote:gatorcane wrote:Anybody have text UKMET?
12UTC 07.09.2017 20.0N 69.0W INTENSE
00UTC 08.09.2017 21.2N 71.7W INTENSE INTENSIFYING RAPIDLY
12UTC 08.09.2017 21.7N 74.5W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
00UTC 09.09.2017 22.0N 76.7W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
12UTC 09.09.2017 22.0N 78.7W INTENSE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
00UTC 10.09.2017 22.5N 80.1W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
12UTC 10.09.2017 23.3N 80.9W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
00UTC 11.09.2017 24.7N 81.1W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
12UTC 11.09.2017 26.7N 81.3W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
00UTC 12.09.2017 29.4N 81.1W INTENSE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
12UTC 12.09.2017 31.9N 81.3W STRONG WEAKENING SLIGHTLY
00UTC 13.09.2017 34.2N 81.3W MODERATE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
12UTC 13.09.2017 35.9N 80.8W MODERATE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
Track is very similar to 00z run.
Well inland in Florida. Landfall at Big Pine Key, moves N-NW west of Lake O, and runs up straight thru Orlando.
Right or not it sticks to its guns...
1 likes
GATOR NATION IS E V E R Y W H E R E !
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Evil Jeremy wrote:gatorcane wrote:Anybody have text UKMET?
12UTC 07.09.2017 20.0N 69.0W INTENSE
00UTC 08.09.2017 21.2N 71.7W INTENSE INTENSIFYING RAPIDLY
12UTC 08.09.2017 21.7N 74.5W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
00UTC 09.09.2017 22.0N 76.7W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
12UTC 09.09.2017 22.0N 78.7W INTENSE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
00UTC 10.09.2017 22.5N 80.1W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
12UTC 10.09.2017 23.3N 80.9W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
00UTC 11.09.2017 24.7N 81.1W INTENSE INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
12UTC 11.09.2017 26.7N 81.3W INTENSE LITTLE CHANGE
00UTC 12.09.2017 29.4N 81.1W INTENSE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
12UTC 12.09.2017 31.9N 81.3W STRONG WEAKENING SLIGHTLY
00UTC 13.09.2017 34.2N 81.3W MODERATE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
12UTC 13.09.2017 35.9N 80.8W MODERATE WEAKENING RAPIDLY
Track is very similar to 00z run.
Very little change in the track compared to last night's, what I can tell.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
I don't care about the "sudden" consistency of the gfs, I'll put my eggs in ukm basket
1 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4072
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
UKMET pretty much locked in on a SE FL hit, up through the spine or a couple of miles east of it.
This run knocks out Metro Dade and Broward.
This run knocks out Metro Dade and Broward.
2 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
USTropics wrote:12z UKMET plots:
Inland over Cuba? Surely that affects her intensity.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Wonder now based on the westward trends in models if the Euro will shift west.
1 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Wonder now based on the westward trends in models if the Euro will shift west. Starting to look more and more like a possible Donna path.
1 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
lando wrote:I don't care about the "sudden" consistency of the gfs, I'll put my eggs in ukm basket
I'm not sure it's right though. It's the only model (or one of the only major models) to still insist that it goes over Cuba, and not just a brush-by either. Once in a while it is right when it is an outlier (reference Ivan 2004, Matthew 2016). I'm not sure this time. If I only had one model basket, it would be the ECMWF which has even outperformed the NHC so far with Irma.
1 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Ronjon-
How serious do we take the UKM model and that track if verified would change impacts on the west coast is that correct?
How serious do we take the UKM model and that track if verified would change impacts on the west coast is that correct?
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Steve wrote:lando wrote:I don't care about the "sudden" consistency of the gfs, I'll put my eggs in ukm basket
I'm not sure it's right though. It's the only model (or one of the only major models) to still insist that it goes over Cuba, and not just a brush-by either. Once in a while it is right when it is an outlier (reference Ivan 2004, Matthew 2016). I'm not sure this time. If I only had one model basket, it would be the ECMWF which has even outperformed the NHC so far with Irma.
UKMET is also showing a Cuba landfall.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests