ATL: PHILIPPE - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9856
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#21 Postby Blown Away » Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:41 pm

Image
12z GFS not real excited about developing 93L, but seems to move the LLC/energy into SGOM, across the Keys/SFL, and then ENE through the Bahamas... GFS still wanting to develop something in the EPAC...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05...
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23499
Age: 46
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#22 Postby gatorcane » Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:44 pm

Blown Away wrote:https://i.imgur.com/6sVgSub.gif
12z GFS not real excited about developing 93L, but seems to move the LLC/energy into SGOM, across the Keys/SFL, and then ENE through the Bahamas... GFS still wanting to develop something in the EPAC...


Yeah it really insists something is going to develop in the EPAC which of course would not allow invest 93l to deepen as much on the model. But I don't buy the EPAC storm and neither does the NHC apparently looking at the TWO for the EPAC which doesn't mention anything about development.

The other thing you will notice about the GFS is that it moves 93L partially inland over the Yucatan for a period of time which further prohibits development despite favorable upper-level conditions over the NW Caribbean. Same for the CMC now.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#23 Postby Alyono » Tue Oct 24, 2017 1:50 pm

ec going with the convective feedback system over the EPAC. This reminds me of Nate
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9856
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#24 Postby Blown Away » Tue Oct 24, 2017 1:58 pm

Alyono wrote:ec going with the convective feedback system over the EPAC. This reminds me of Nate

Image
12z Euro... You can see the convective feedback, but the energy falling in line with other models moving @NE across Cuba/Fl Straits/Central Bahamas...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05...
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
TheStormExpert
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8487
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:38 pm
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#25 Postby TheStormExpert » Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:18 pm

Alyono wrote:ec going with the convective feedback system over the EPAC. This reminds me of Nate

What’s your thoughts on how this might play out? Do you see a Nate repeat for Florida?
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by storm2k.org.

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23499
Age: 46
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#26 Postby gatorcane » Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:59 pm

gatorcane wrote:12Z UKMET looks to hit SE FL at 980-990MB so another west shift:

NEW TROPICAL CYCLONE FORECAST TO DEVELOP AFTER 66 HOURS
FORECAST POSITION AT T+ 66 : 16.9N 83.1W

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 27.10.2017 72 17.1N 83.9W 1005 30
0000UTC 28.10.2017 84 19.4N 83.4W 1001 34
1200UTC 28.10.2017 96 22.3N 82.7W 990 51
0000UTC 29.10.2017 108 25.2N 80.7W 981 61
1200UTC 29.10.2017 120 27.8N 77.2W 989 54
0000UTC 30.10.2017 132 33.1N 72.8W 988 54
1200UTC 30.10.2017 144 42.9N 73.5W 979 48


Image
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#27 Postby Frank2 » Tue Oct 24, 2017 3:22 pm

Let's hope not, and the shear forecast is for strong shear throughout the forecast cycle...

Frank
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23499
Age: 46
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#28 Postby gatorcane » Tue Oct 24, 2017 3:52 pm

Strongest run yet from the NAM (yeah I know it is the NAM):

Image
0 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#29 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Tue Oct 24, 2017 5:11 pm

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
CyclonicFury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1970
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 12:32 pm
Location: NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#30 Postby CyclonicFury » Tue Oct 24, 2017 5:12 pm

GFS continues to show the EPAC convective feedbackcane. Not sure if we can get accurate model depictions until it figures this out - I wonder if this is increasing the shear predicted on the GFS and ECMWF operational models. SHIPS model shows shear remaining low to moderate throughout the forecast period. NHC not seeing anything in the EPAC.
0 likes   
NCSU B.S. in Meteorology Class of 2021. Tropical weather blogger at http://www.cyclonicfury.com. My forecasts and thoughts are NOT official, for official forecasts please consult the National Hurricane Center.

LarryWx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5686
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#31 Postby LarryWx » Tue Oct 24, 2017 5:23 pm

The 12Z EPS has only one of 50 members with a sub 1000 mb TC hitting FL (far south).
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
CyclonicFury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1970
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 12:32 pm
Location: NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#32 Postby CyclonicFury » Tue Oct 24, 2017 5:31 pm

LarryWx wrote:The 12Z EPS has only one of 50 members with a sub 1000 mb TC hitting FL (far south).

How many total members show any form of development into a TD or TS?
0 likes   
NCSU B.S. in Meteorology Class of 2021. Tropical weather blogger at http://www.cyclonicfury.com. My forecasts and thoughts are NOT official, for official forecasts please consult the National Hurricane Center.

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#33 Postby Frank2 » Tue Oct 24, 2017 5:53 pm

GFS continues to show the EPAC convective feedbackcane. Not sure if we can get accurate model depictions until it figures this out - I wonder if this is increasing the shear predicted on the GFS and ECMWF operational models. SHIPS model shows shear remaining low to moderate throughout the forecast period. NHC not seeing anything in the EPAC.


I think the GFS is correct, because the southern end of the trough is forecast to be over SFL this weekend...
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2800
Age: 45
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#34 Postby blp » Tue Oct 24, 2017 6:17 pm

I wonder if the normally conservative Ukmet has the right idea on this one since it does not develop the EPAC microcanes.

Image
2 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
TheStormExpert
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8487
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:38 pm
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#35 Postby TheStormExpert » Tue Oct 24, 2017 6:19 pm

blp wrote:I wonder if the normally conservative Ukmet has the right idea on this one since it does not develop the EPAC microcanes.

Image

Wouldn’t be the first time this season it has gotten something right.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by storm2k.org.

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#36 Postby Frank2 » Tue Oct 24, 2017 7:15 pm

Current model cluster. My guess the UK is underestimating the trough:

https://www.sfwmd.gov/weather-radar/hur ... odel-plots
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9593
Age: 46
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#37 Postby SFLcane » Tue Oct 24, 2017 7:20 pm

Frank2 wrote:Current model cluster. My guess the UK is underestimating the trough:

https://www.sfwmd.gov/weather-radar/hur ... odel-plots


Close enough regardless for SFL to see impacts possibly in the form of heavy rainfall. Let’s hope that’s all
0 likes   

joey
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:11 pm

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#38 Postby joey » Tue Oct 24, 2017 9:10 pm

SFLcane wrote:
Frank2 wrote:Current model cluster. My guess the UK is underestimating the trough:

https://www.sfwmd.gov/weather-radar/hur ... odel-plots


Close enough regardless for SFL to see impacts possibly in the form of heavy rainfall. Let’s hope that’s all


Be very interesting to see how this one will play out we should know by the weekend right?
0 likes   

User avatar
TheStormExpert
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8487
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:38 pm
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#39 Postby TheStormExpert » Tue Oct 24, 2017 9:12 pm

joey wrote:
SFLcane wrote:
Frank2 wrote:Current model cluster. My guess the UK is underestimating the trough:

https://www.sfwmd.gov/weather-radar/hur ... odel-plots


Close enough regardless for SFL to see impacts possibly in the form of heavy rainfall. Let’s hope that’s all


Be very interesting to see how this one will play out we should know by the weekend right?

It’ll be heading out by the weekend. I’m starting to think the models might’ve been onto something with the E-PAC development.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by storm2k.org.

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 40
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Models

#40 Postby WeatherEmperor » Tue Oct 24, 2017 10:45 pm

0z GFS starts EPAC development at 42hrs. Perhaps it was right all along??

Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests