cycloneye wrote:@MJVentrice
I strongly believe that models will better align with invest #90L on track and intensity once this storm pushes off the Yucatan on Saturday. Until then, there is still room for change in the models.
https://twitter.com/MJVentrice/status/999642080367529984
ATL: ALBERTO - Post-Tropical
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models
I believe it will be sooner than Saturday before 90L pushes off the Yucatan. IMO
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2434
- Age: 32
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia
ATL: INVEST 90L - Models
If the 06Z GFS were to verify and 90L (future Alberto) make landfall in the U.S. as a hurricane on 28 May, the storm would be the earliest such seasonal occurrence known. Since 1851, the earliest hurricane landfall in the continental U.S. during the calendar year was Cat-1 Alma (1966), which struck on 9 June. However, preliminary reanalysis has found that a Cat-2 hurricane struck on 28 May 1863. So Alberto-to-be might tie that event as the earliest in to occur in a season, but certainly would not be nearly as intense. Interestingly, both Alma and the 1863 hurricane made landfall very close to Apalachicola, FL.
Edit: Thanks to whoever moved my post to the appropriate thread.
Edit: Thanks to whoever moved my post to the appropriate thread.

Last edited by Shell Mound on Thu May 24, 2018 8:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
gatorcane wrote:I am a bit surprised the overnight models have gone more bullish with all of the shear in the GOM and the last 06Z GFS run shifted considerably west. I am guessing since 90L is more organized right now than models previously thought, the models are responding accordingly. Blend of ECMWF and GFS looks to be the best track at this point.
It appears models are trying to develop an anticyclone over 90L as it moves into the GOM. If this verifies it would likely provide a 24-48 hour window for some steady intensification, especially if it passes right over the loop current where the SST's are quite warm and deep.

1 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 4806
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
- Location: South Florida
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models
A closer look at the 06Z Navgem

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
gatorcane wrote:I am a bit surprised the overnight models have gone more bullish with all of the shear in the GOM and the last 06Z GFS run shifted considerably west. I am guessing since 90L is more organized right now than models previously thought, the models are responding accordingly. Blend of ECMWF and GFS looks to be the best track at this point.
Think the agreement is the system is underneath the upper low, which is an area of very low shear
3 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
That's exactly right 91. Yesterday, some of the local tv stations were showing the upper flow on their in-house products, and the shear backs off west and basically splits an alleyway where 90L comes up through. It's a much lower shear zone with some of the shear to the north becoming positioned in such a way as to vent. I'm not saying this is going to happen, just that's what the upper flow looked like in those outputs. But there's a fairly good chance that by Sunday or Monday, we have a much better looking and more concentric system than anyone was talking about all week. It's still likely to be somewhat lopsided, but even money the radar and satellite presentations aren't what people have been saying it was going to look like. I think even the global models "IR/Radar outputs" are starting to latch onto that idea as well.
1 likes
- ouragans
- Category 1
- Posts: 490
- Age: 53
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:09 pm
- Location: Abymes, Guadeloupe F.W.I
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion : STWO=40%-80%
cycloneye wrote:12z Best Track:
Location: 19.3°N 88.2°W
Maximum Winds: 25 kt
Minimum Central Pressure: 1009 mb
That's weird. I generally use TropicalAtlantic to read Best Track data and it says there was no update since 6z...
EDIT: TropicalTidbits says "There are currently no invests in any ocean basin."

Last edited by ouragans on Thu May 24, 2018 9:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Personal forecast disclaimer
This post is a personal point of view, not an information. Please refer to official statements for life-threatening decisions.
David '79, Frederic '79, Hugo '89, Iris, Luis & Marilyn '95, Georges '98, Lenny '99, Dean '07, Irma '17, Maria '17, Fiona '22, Philippe '23, Tammy '23
16°13'33.3,"6N -61°36'39.5"W
This post is a personal point of view, not an information. Please refer to official statements for life-threatening decisions.
David '79, Frederic '79, Hugo '89, Iris, Luis & Marilyn '95, Georges '98, Lenny '99, Dean '07, Irma '17, Maria '17, Fiona '22, Philippe '23, Tammy '23
16°13'33.3,"6N -61°36'39.5"W
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models
I wonder why they even still use the NAVGEM. I guess it's statistically better than flipping coins, but it's become one of the worst models in any of the suite. Rarely does it lead the pack with trends, and it's probably been 20 years or so since it scored highly. Even in the tropics, I'd take the NAM over it - particularly after the NAM led the way showing a future extreme Harvey when even the top globals had nearly dissipated it coming off the Yucatan. Blind squirrel meeting a nut or improvement? Who knows.
Speaking of the NAM, it's out to 33 hours and seemingly emerging off the Yucatan. We'll see where it goes for 84.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 2412&fh=27
Speaking of the NAM, it's out to 33 hours and seemingly emerging off the Yucatan. We'll see where it goes for 84.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 2412&fh=27
2 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:This kinda reminds me of Cindy last year, and Bill in 2015. Could this drift all the way to SW LA or TX?
Same here.. I would not rule it out.
You're saying you wouldn't rule out Texas?
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23691
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
VIS loop. I have a feeling a lot of discussion will be upcoming over the next couple of days about whether the center is relocating under the deeper convection over the Yucatan channel:
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=12
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=12
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
I see we have multiple vorts around.. lol last nights all died. looks like convection is about to spit out another one.. soo we wait..
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
Also a bunch of mid level dry air has been pulled in from the west again. so today may be a little slow with convection. Except for another round of land convection producing more vorts later...
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
Well it would seem that based on trends the steady rains should remain west of peninsular florida so hopefully we can salvage our holiday weekend to some degree. with a stout southeast wind we should still see plenty of convection converging on the west coast though...so duck and cover space will be a requirement. Doesn't look like our low is in any hurry to move and the convection is firing over lots of deep warm water in the Yucatan channel
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models
Nam barely makes it passed the central gulf before turning W to wsw and is quite a bit stronger..
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
I am not canceling my outdoor plans here in SE Florida the storm will be too far away from this part of the state.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
SoupBone wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:This kinda reminds me of Cindy last year, and Bill in 2015. Could this drift all the way to SW LA or TX?
Same here.. I would not rule it out.
You're saying you wouldn't rule out Texas?
Aric, what indicators are you seeing that would not rule out a Texas impact?
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
SoupBone wrote:SoupBone wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:
Same here.. I would not rule it out.
You're saying you wouldn't rule out Texas?
Aric, what indicators are you seeing that would not rule out a Texas impact?
Stronger ridging building in. and no long wave trough to pick it up. the ICON model and others have hinted at the idea. however, if it were to happen it would likely only be a weak low pressure.
1 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
psyclone wrote:Well it would seem that based on trends the steady rains should remain west of peninsular florida so hopefully we can salvage our holiday weekend to some degree. with a stout southeast wind we should still see plenty of convection converging on the west coast though...so duck and cover space will be a requirement. Doesn't look like our low is in any hurry to move and the convection is firing over lots of deep warm water in the Yucatan channel
it's a lopsided system that's broad so it may not be the case - we could still see heavy rains along the Fl west coast perhaps 30-50 miles inland - we'll see. It could be a redo of Debbie in 2012.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/post/tropical-storm-debby-generates-incredible-rainfall-over-north-florida/2012/06/26/gJQAnzJP4V_blog.html?utm_term=.068c92777281
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests