ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Age: 27
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#81 Postby AutoPenalti » Thu Aug 01, 2019 4:17 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
AutoPenalti wrote:Funny enough that once this was declared an invest models just said No.


Could be the input parameters from the invest. Before the invest maybe it was more open ranged data... and now its defined with a size and strict location. Who knows. Some piece of information was included and muddled everything up more.

Though this is also nothing new.. few more runs and we will have a better idea.

Why does it need to be declared an invest in order for better data to be inputted? That seems a bit illogical.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#82 Postby northjaxpro » Thu Aug 01, 2019 4:26 pm

Well, I have to ask since Uncle SAL has 96L on its last rites currently, is it time to call upon Bones to come to Sick Bay to make his final diagnosis on 96L?
Last edited by northjaxpro on Thu Aug 01, 2019 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#83 Postby floridasun78 » Thu Aug 01, 2019 4:34 pm

model dont well forecasting sal and shear because you saw past few days show 96l becoming big system now we see sal affecting it as did with 95l
0 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1709
Age: 23
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#84 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Thu Aug 01, 2019 5:15 pm

northjaxpro wrote:Well, I have to ask since Uncle SAL has 96L on its last rites currently, is it time to call upon Bones to come to Sick Bay to make his final diagnosis on 96L?

no
3 likes   

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#85 Postby northjaxpro » Thu Aug 01, 2019 5:45 pm

:uarrow: I'll give 96L a couple of days more while on life support to see if it can make it past 55 degrees Longitude with still a pulse. I will give it one last chance to resurrect itself, but the outlook does not good. 96L battling up against long odds of surviving well into this weekend,.let.alone next week.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

hohnywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 504
Age: 33
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:34 pm
Location: Hastings-on-Hudson, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#86 Postby hohnywx » Thu Aug 01, 2019 6:00 pm

northjaxpro wrote:Well, I have to ask since Uncle SAL has 96L on its last rites currently, is it time to call upon Bones to come to Sick Bay to make his final diagnosis on 96L?


This isn’t directed at you specifically, but posts like these add so little to the discussion. This system was never supposed to strengthen at this location in the MDR. Just because the models backed off today on development does not mean it won’t come back tomorrow. Again, the NHC (the people that actually get paid for this) chose to keep development chances at 70% at 2 PM.
6 likes   

User avatar
DioBrando
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 917
Age: 27
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 12:45 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#87 Postby DioBrando » Thu Aug 01, 2019 6:02 pm

hohnywx wrote:
northjaxpro wrote:Well, I have to ask since Uncle SAL has 96L on its last rites currently, is it time to call upon Bones to come to Sick Bay to make his final diagnosis on 96L?


This isn’t directed at you specifically, but posts like these add so little to the discussion. This system was never supposed to strengthen at this location in the MDR. Just because the models backed off today on development does not mean it won’t come back tomorrow. Again, the NHC (the people that actually get paid for this) chose to keep development chances at 70% at 2 PM.

So you think this will redevelop later on?
0 likes   
blonde stacey (xe/xem/xir)

ava_ati
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 8:36 am
Location: Saint Augustine

ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#88 Postby ava_ati » Thu Aug 01, 2019 6:24 pm

gatorcane wrote:70% chance of development suddenly seems much too high at this point. Seems they will need to drop that number a decent amount on the next update. Big time model bust on this one.


You think so? I mean yeah it was on again off again... But the GFS had way more "this is nothing runs" than it did moster major runs and the ECMWF was never super bullish, especially later in the runs (it had troubles detecting the SAL early). At this point I think a Cat 3+ into Miami would be a bust

Go look at the 18z July 27th run (4 days ago)

Image

Even the 12z Euro from the 27th had nothing more than an open wave through the Carrib (the one higher up around VA's lat was 95L)

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#89 Postby northjaxpro » Thu Aug 01, 2019 6:36 pm

I have been a member for 9 years on Storm 2k, and we need to have some lighter moments at times on these forums. I have learned through the years. I actually appreciate the esteemed resident mod/ pro met of Storm2k, Wxman57 , for bringing Bones in for bringing in some moments to take the edge off of some you on here.

It is part of the discussion, in a looser way. Either you feel that the SAL and potential eventual shear will kill off 96L for good, or if 96L will make one of the great resurrections in TC history... 8-) You decide..
Last edited by northjaxpro on Thu Aug 01, 2019 6:41 pm, edited 3 times in total.
9 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

USTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2414
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#90 Postby USTropics » Thu Aug 01, 2019 6:38 pm

Besides the operational models, ensemble support has really diminished. Ukmet has 6% ensemble support, ECMWF has 18%, and GFS has 30% (https://ruc.noaa.gov/hfip/tceps/tceps.php?stm=96L.2019&dtg=2019080112)

This is essentially what is referred to as a 'dry wave'. No sustainable convection, not only from the SAL to the north but also dry, anomalous mid-level air located to the south:

mid-level WV CIMSS product:
Image

12z GFS:
Image

Development chances are dwindling but not nonexistent, there still remains a sharp wave axis with a pronounced vorticity signature. This is still a potent 'seed', and perhaps when it reaches west of 50W it can rebuild some convection (see GFS image above, a better environment remains there).
0 likes   

hohnywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 504
Age: 33
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:34 pm
Location: Hastings-on-Hudson, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#91 Postby hohnywx » Thu Aug 01, 2019 6:59 pm

DioBrando wrote:
hohnywx wrote:
northjaxpro wrote:Well, I have to ask since Uncle SAL has 96L on its last rites currently, is it time to call upon Bones to come to Sick Bay to make his final diagnosis on 96L?


This isn’t directed at you specifically, but posts like these add so little to the discussion. This system was never supposed to strengthen at this location in the MDR. Just because the models backed off today on development does not mean it won’t come back tomorrow. Again, the NHC (the people that actually get paid for this) chose to keep development chances at 70% at 2 PM.

So you think this will redevelop later on?


I’m not a meteorologist, nor do I play one on TV, so I don’t issue forecasts. I take my information from the NHC.
1 likes   

Cpv17
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4331
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:24 pm
Location: Wharton/El Campo, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#92 Postby Cpv17 » Thu Aug 01, 2019 7:28 pm

This is one of those systems that will probably remain weak till it gets near the Bahamas or the NW Caribbean. That area seems to be the sweet spot for development and of course the entire GOM. Of course this system may never even make it to those areas. It’s way early still guys. As long as the vorticity holds together, I wouldn’t write it off.
2 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#93 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Aug 01, 2019 10:56 pm

I guess i missed all fun while i was driving lol.. great conversations lol
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#94 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Aug 01, 2019 11:11 pm

As usual.. gfs back with development and stronger ridging.. never saw that coming lol oh wait...i did
Sorry less titled ridge axis..
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Thu Aug 01, 2019 11:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#95 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Thu Aug 01, 2019 11:23 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:As usual.. gfs back with development and stronger ridging.. never saw that coming lol oh wait... i did
Sorry less titled ridge axis..


GFS is not developing this at 0z.
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#96 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Aug 01, 2019 11:25 pm

tarheelprogrammer wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:As usual.. gfs back with development and stronger ridging.. never saw that coming lol oh wait... i did
Sorry less titled ridge axis..


GFS is not developing this at 0z.


Before it passes PR.... and much more orginization than previous runs..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5594
Age: 40
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#97 Postby Hammy » Fri Aug 02, 2019 12:31 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
tarheelprogrammer wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:As usual.. gfs back with development and stronger ridging.. never saw that coming lol oh wait... i did
Sorry less titled ridge axis..


GFS is not developing this at 0z.


Before it passes PR.... and much more orginization than previous runs..


It's beyond 240h and the GFS can hardly be considered reliable north of 25, and it's essentially doing what it did with 95L--toying with development out of range until getting the actual conditions resolved.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

bamajammer4eva
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:21 am
Location: Ozark, AL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#98 Postby bamajammer4eva » Fri Aug 02, 2019 12:37 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
tarheelprogrammer wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:As usual.. gfs back with development and stronger ridging.. never saw that coming lol oh wait... i did
Sorry less titled ridge axis..


GFS is not developing this at 0z.


Before it passes PR.... and much more orginization than previous runs..


Loop of last 5 GFS runs showing the trend near PR from 8/1 @ 00z to 8/2 @ 00z. It does bring it back for a frame or 2, High seems to be weaker with each run however.

Image
0 likes   

bamajammer4eva
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:21 am
Location: Ozark, AL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#99 Postby bamajammer4eva » Fri Aug 02, 2019 1:03 am

Cpv17 wrote:This is one of those systems that will probably remain weak till it gets near the Bahamas or the NW Caribbean. That area seems to be the sweet spot for development and of course the entire GOM. Of course this system may never even make it to those areas. It’s way early still guys. As long as the vorticity holds together, I wouldn’t write it off.


Its gonna have to get near the Yucatan or western tip of Cuba to develop according to this

 https://twitter.com/MJVentrice/status/1157016490639593472


0 likes   

dexterlabio
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3407
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#100 Postby dexterlabio » Fri Aug 02, 2019 2:19 am

NOT saying this is gonna go Harvey, but didn't that invest that became Harvey only ramp up when it got near the mainland or something...I can remember posts pointing to its total dissipation with little support from the models that it would regenerate.. But it did anyway and even packed a punch. My point is systems are tagged as invests for a reason so we should look onto every possibilities or scenarios. :)
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2019”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 88 guests