ATL: ETA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1361 Postby supercane4867 » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:35 pm

Satellite presentation of Eta is almost in uncharted waters for the North Atlantic basin. It's behaving like a SPAC system so far.

Image
16 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1362 Postby aspen » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:37 pm

Kingarabian wrote:
supercane4867 wrote:3 hours until next recon. Planned to take off at 7:30PM central time.

Yeah should catch it at its peak. Can't wait.

All of my fingers are crossed that it actually makes it.

Meanwhile, some >-35C pixels are starting to show up in the eye, and the CDO is a solid, thick ring of pink (<-80C). Probably at least 125 kt and <935 mbar right now.
2 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1363 Postby RL3AO » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:37 pm

Chemmers wrote:Could it get to 8 maybe?


Sometimes it's worth looking back at Haiyan to remember what a true 8.0 is. Eta might be a cat 5 by landfall, but it's no Haiyan.


Image
14 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1364 Postby supercane4867 » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:39 pm

RL3AO wrote:
Chemmers wrote:Could it get to 8 maybe?


Sometimes it's worth looking back at Haiyan to remember what a true 8.0 is. Eta might be a cat 5 by landfall, but it's no Haiyan.


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/04/Haiyan_2013-11-07_1430Z_IR-BD_lineless.png/960px-Haiyan_2013-11-07_1430Z_IR-BD_lineless.png

It's all about eye temp and banding features. Eta does have a cold enough CDO but its eye temp has been lagging a lot.

Image
3 likes   

PandaCitrus
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1365 Postby PandaCitrus » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:40 pm

Is the track supposed to direct hit on Puerto Cabazas? That seems to be the only large down on the entire coast, very unlucky if that is the track. There's a lot of very unpopulated coast there.
2 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1366 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:40 pm

AF304 is on the tarmac. AF305 had an SFMR malfunction I heard, which is critical when dealing with a high-intensity hurricane.

ETA into Eta - if all goes well - is probably around 0230Z. In time for the 10 pm advisory.
9 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1367 Postby aspen » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:41 pm

Recon is on the runway! Please, PLEASE make it this time...
2 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1368 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:41 pm

supercane4867 wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
Chemmers wrote:Could it get to 8 maybe?


Sometimes it's worth looking back at Haiyan to remember what a true 8.0 is. Eta might be a cat 5 by landfall, but it's no Haiyan.


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/04/Haiyan_2013-11-07_1430Z_IR-BD_lineless.png/960px-Haiyan_2013-11-07_1430Z_IR-BD_lineless.png

It's all about eye temp and banding features. Eta does have a cold enough CDO but its eye temp has been lagging a lot.

https://i.imgur.com/dxIfWaX.jpg



That would be a borderline 6.5-7.0 there. Enough to justify 130 kt at the intermediate.
0 likes   

ClarCari
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:02 am

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1369 Postby ClarCari » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:41 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:AF304 is on the tarmac. AF305 had an SFMR malfunction I heard, which is critical when dealing with a high-intensity hurricane.

ETA into Eta - if all goes well - is probably around 0230Z. In time for the 10 pm advisory.


PRAISE THEEEE!!!

I can’t keep taking this much emotional abuse :oops:
2 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1370 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:43 pm

supercane4867 wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
Chemmers wrote:Could it get to 8 maybe?


Sometimes it's worth looking back at Haiyan to remember what a true 8.0 is. Eta might be a cat 5 by landfall, but it's no Haiyan.


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/04/Haiyan_2013-11-07_1430Z_IR-BD_lineless.png/960px-Haiyan_2013-11-07_1430Z_IR-BD_lineless.png

It's all about eye temp and banding features. Eta does have a cold enough CDO but its eye temp has been lagging a lot.

https://i.imgur.com/dxIfWaX.jpg

True but that may not be the case for long. This recent clearing looks like it could get all the way through
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1371 Postby supercane4867 » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:44 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:AF304 is on the tarmac. AF305 had an SFMR malfunction I heard, which is critical when dealing with a high-intensity hurricane.

ETA into Eta - if all goes well - is probably around 0230Z. In time for the 10 pm advisory.

Abandoning the entire mission because of SFMR malfunction is not worth it IMO. At least we could get some good FL level wind and pressure readings had they decided to go in.
2 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5303
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1372 Postby Nimbus » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:44 pm

PandaCitrus wrote:Is the track supposed to direct hit on Puerto Cabazas? That seems to be the only large down on the entire coast, very unlucky if that is the track. There's a lot of very unpopulated coast there.


last few frames look kind of weird slowing down or bucking the ridge maybe.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1373 Postby RL3AO » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:44 pm

Although a full ring of CDG is really impressive for any Atlantic hurricane.
9 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1374 Postby ozonepete » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:45 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
GCANE wrote:Looks south of forecast track

https://i.imgur.com/hnLf79E.png

https://i.imgur.com/OKeq97I.png



that it is and its heading south of all models and eps .. appears to be doing a loop/stall from some of the previous model runs.


I totally agree. This is doing a counterclockwise loop and it may stall out as well. The building high to its northwest may be getting stronger than was forecast.
4 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1375 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:45 pm

supercane4867 wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:AF304 is on the tarmac. AF305 had an SFMR malfunction I heard, which is critical when dealing with a high-intensity hurricane.

ETA into Eta - if all goes well - is probably around 0230Z. In time for the 10 pm advisory.

Abandoning the entire mission because of SFMR malfunction is not worth it IMO. At least we could get some good FL level wind and pressure readings had they decided to go in.


True, but that would defeat a lot of the purpose of the mission, especially considering the cost and safety issues with a high-intensity hurricane. It would be justifiable if this was a tropical storm or low-level invest mission, but not for a bombing major hurricane.
2 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3354
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1376 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:45 pm

Very possible Eta is nearing Category 5 status right now.

Image
8 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1377 Postby supercane4867 » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:47 pm

Also you don't have to get a T8.0 bulletin from SAB or TAFB for ADT to be as high or even go beyond that. Patricia never had an official T8.0 rating on the subjective Dvorak scale but has the highest ever ADT output on the planet.
1 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5049
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1378 Postby ElectricStorm » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:47 pm

supercane4867 wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:AF304 is on the tarmac. AF305 had an SFMR malfunction I heard, which is critical when dealing with a high-intensity hurricane.

ETA into Eta - if all goes well - is probably around 0230Z. In time for the 10 pm advisory.

Abandoning the entire mission because of SFMR malfunction is not worth it IMO. At least we could get some good FL level wind and pressure readings had they decided to go in.

Yeah for real they could have still got some valuable info...
0 likes   
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25

Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1379 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:47 pm

supercane4867 wrote:Also you don't have to get a T8.0 bulletin from SAB or TAFB for ADT to be as high or even go beyond that. Patricia never had an official T8.0 rating on the subjective Dvorak scale but has the highest ever ADT output on the planet.


Patricia also had a much warmer eye, but this could certainly get there.

The question: how high does NHC go on the intermediate advisory? I'd say high end cat 4.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1380 Postby RL3AO » Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:48 pm

I'd put it in the 125 to 130kt range now.
2 likes   


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest