ATL: IOTA - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
wx98
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1218
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 9:24 pm

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1441 Postby wx98 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:33 pm

Iceresistance wrote:
wx98 wrote:
Iceresistance wrote:I forgot the image!
Only 1 wind barb is below 10 knots
https://s8.gifyu.com/images/Really-tiny-eye.png

How does that indicate anything about the eye getting smaller? It’s already on the small side anyway.

It can get slightly smaller or larger over time right now.


That wasn’t an answer. I was generally curious. But ok...
5 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1793
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1442 Postby kevin » Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:33 pm

I think they'll keep it as a cat 5 for now and wait for the next recon plane in order to possibly downgrade it to a cat 4 before landfall if the new plane also doesn't measure 137+ kt winds.
Last edited by kevin on Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

wx98
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1218
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 9:24 pm

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1443 Postby wx98 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:35 pm

kevin wrote:I think they'll keep it as a cat 5 for now and wait for the next recon plane in order to possibly downgrade it to a cat 4 before landfall if the new plane also doesn't measure 137+ kt winds.

I think they will too. Post-season is the time to get it right scientifically.
0 likes   

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8931
Age: 20
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1444 Postby Iceresistance » Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:38 pm

There was a secondary increase in wind by Recon outside the eye, was it a max wind band or a secondary eyewall developing?

Image
0 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22506
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1445 Postby wxman57 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:41 pm

wx98 wrote:Yeah I didn’t expect to see 140 knots that pass so not surprised. The RFQ is still the NW so that should be stronger than the NE side. I was surprised by the SE eyewall being the strongest so far.


Pretty slow west movement, so anywhere on the north side may have max wind. Could even be on the SE side, depending on where the heaviest squalls have rotated.
2 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22506
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1446 Postby wxman57 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:44 pm

aspen wrote:
Weather Dude wrote:Looks like they're keeping it at 140 for now

31L IOTA 201116 1800 13.5N 82.3W ATL 140 918

Until we get data from the NW quad, that’s a safe estimate to go with.


Plane made its first pass NW-SE. NE quad had 115 kts (118 kts second pass). SE had 132 kts on the first pass. Max FL wind 145 kts so far. NE quad was 125-130 kts. It's certainly possible winds are 135-140 kts, but any 140kt winds are very isolated and hard for the plane to find. Pressure down just a tad to 919 mb.
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10787
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1447 Postby GCANE » Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:45 pm

Eye is still 12nm wide.
Borderline pinhole
2 likes   

underthwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1931
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 2:14 pm
Location: Brazoria County Texas

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1448 Postby underthwx » Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:49 pm

Buck wrote:
wx98 wrote:Lack of SFMR or FL wind data to support 140 kts would indicate this is no longer Cat 5. Still an incredibly intense high-end Category 4.


Good. We got a crazy, record breaking storm... now I hope it implodes before landfall. They need a break down there.

For sure Buck
1 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1449 Postby supercane4867 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:03 pm

Very clear concentric eyewall signal on the fresh AMSR pass

Image
4 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1450 Postby SouthDadeFish » Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:05 pm

The deepest convection is located in the southern eyewall. That's probably why recon is finding stronger winds within the southern part of the vortex.

 https://twitter.com/MikeFischerWx/status/1328428442300407808


8 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1793
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1451 Postby kevin » Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:06 pm

It looks like a perfectly shaped storm. Were it not for recon I would have assumed continuous strengthening over the last few hours. Luckily that doesn't seem to be the case, but I don't think we can rule out some strengthening before landfall. However, even if it weakens I don't think it'll fall below 125 kts before landfall so whatever happens a catastrophic landfall unfortunately seems unavoidable.
5 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4623
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1452 Postby ElectricStorm » Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:18 pm

As mentioned by others earlier I think they'll keep it a 5 at this advisory. I think the recon hit the bullseye earlier today to find that tiny area of Cat 5 winds and since the pressure has remained steady since then I think there's a chance they missed that tiny area on this mission. Microwave shows that there may be a chance for an ERC before landfall so it likely won't be a 5 for all that much longer anyway, which is a tad bit of good news for CA but there's not any difference between a 130kt landfall or a 140kt landfall. What an impressive storm overall. For sure was a Cat 5 and may still be for a little while longer. Really praying for those folks about to experience their second Cat 4+ hit in 2 weeks...
3 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5566
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1453 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:25 pm

supercane4867 wrote:Very clear concentric eyewall signal on the fresh AMSR pass

https://i.imgur.com/hLEKrEV.jpg

Agreed, no question. The flattening of the gradient would also explain the decrease in winds despite consistent pressure. One thing I note though is how narrow the moat is between them, practically nonexistent, which would explain the lack of a significant double wind maximum. Could this be a meld in progress?
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14942
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1454 Postby NDG » Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:27 pm

I just don't see it weakening much if any over the next few hours before landfall without an EWRC starting.

Image
4 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1793
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1455 Postby kevin » Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:44 pm

After we (and I assume the NHC themselves as well) were a bit frustrated by the recon issues with Eta, I think this is also a time to praise the NHC for their excellent recon coverage of Iota. A constant and demanding schedule of one flight every 6 hours with a plane in the air at pretty much all times and no issues whatsoever except for one unfortunate bird strike.
15 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8061
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1456 Postby aspen » Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:47 pm

This will be the final recon flight into Iota. I can’t believe how well recon has done with this storm compared to Eta — minimal connection issues, an every flight runs like clockwork and as planned.
14 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

wx98
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1218
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 9:24 pm

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1457 Postby wx98 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:48 pm

BULLETIN
Hurricane Iota Advisory Number 14
NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL AL312020
400 PM EST Mon Nov 16 2020

...CATEGORY 5 IOTA CLOSING IN ON NICARAGUA...
...EXPECTED TO BRING CATASTROPHIC WINDS, LIFE-THREATENING STORM
SURGE, AND TORRENTIAL RAINFALL TO CENTRAL AMERICA...


SUMMARY OF 400 PM EST...2100 UTC...INFORMATION
----------------------------------------------
LOCATION...13.6N 82.7W
ABOUT 55 MI...90 KM ESE OF PUERTO CABEZAS NICARAGUA
ABOUT 100 MI...165 KM SSE OF CABO GRACIAS A DIOS ON NIC/HON BORDER
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...160 MPH...260 KM/H
PRESENT MOVEMENT...W OR 275 DEGREES AT 9 MPH...15 KM/H
MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...919 MB...27.14 INCHES
3 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8061
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1458 Postby aspen » Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:55 pm

kevin wrote:After we (and I assume the NHC themselves as well) were a bit frustrated by the recon issues with Eta, I think this is also a time to praise the NHC for their excellent recon coverage of Iota. A constant and demanding schedule of one flight every 6 hours with a plane in the air at pretty much all times and no issues whatsoever except for one unfortunate bird strike.

One of the planes hit a bird?
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1793
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1459 Postby kevin » Mon Nov 16, 2020 4:00 pm

aspen wrote:
kevin wrote:After we (and I assume the NHC themselves as well) were a bit frustrated by the recon issues with Eta, I think this is also a time to praise the NHC for their excellent recon coverage of Iota. A constant and demanding schedule of one flight every 6 hours with a plane in the air at pretty much all times and no issues whatsoever except for one unfortunate bird strike.

One of the planes hit a bird?


Yes the flight earlier today that eventually measured cat 5 winds hit a bird during take-off so they had to switch planes. That's why that mission was delayed by ~1 hour.
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4623
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1460 Postby ElectricStorm » Mon Nov 16, 2020 4:02 pm

kevin wrote:
aspen wrote:
kevin wrote:After we (and I assume the NHC themselves as well) were a bit frustrated by the recon issues with Eta, I think this is also a time to praise the NHC for their excellent recon coverage of Iota. A constant and demanding schedule of one flight every 6 hours with a plane in the air at pretty much all times and no issues whatsoever except for one unfortunate bird strike.

One of the planes hit a bird?


Yes the flight earlier today that eventually measured a cat 5 winds hit a bird during take-off so they had to switch planes. That's why that mission was delayed by ~1 hour.

I was wondering why there were 2 mission 6s listed on tropical tidbits. I thought they just got the flight number wrong or something
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], StormWeather and 13 guests