ATL: LAURA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#381 Postby Blown Away » Wed Aug 19, 2020 7:47 am

Image
Image

Sure does look like consolidation happening @12.3N/44.6W...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

wx98
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 9:24 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#382 Postby wx98 » Wed Aug 19, 2020 7:47 am

NDG wrote:
wx98 wrote:
NDG wrote:
Is initialized well, but it does show the eastern vorticity taking over as it rotates westward and the western vorticity dying out later today, we will see if it is right, but doubtful.

https://i.imgur.com/PmG24xZ.gif


If the western vort is what they would begin issuing advisories on, and this shows the eastern vort taking over, maybe they are waiting until one completely dies so the other can become dominant. That way they don’t begin tracking a dying vort.


No advisories yet when a well defined surface closed circulation is still not present, even the most aggressive models, HWRF & ICON, do not show a well defined closed circulation until at least tomorrow.


Obviously that is the case, as I was saying. They wouldn’t begin tracking a dying vort. So if one isn’t dominant and well-defined, that’s what they are waiting on.
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#383 Postby SFLcane » Wed Aug 19, 2020 7:47 am

we'll know in 6-12 hours if the Euro is wrong about the convection.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#384 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Aug 19, 2020 7:51 am

First ASCAT missed the center. but all is not lost..

there is no longer a vort or a convergence boundary to the NE. my suspicions of it being much more Circular are looking good.

Image
4 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145286
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#385 Postby cycloneye » Wed Aug 19, 2020 7:52 am

Blown Away , is more south.

98L INVEST 200819 1200 11.7N 44.4W ATL 25 1009
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#386 Postby toad strangler » Wed Aug 19, 2020 7:54 am

Gaining absolutely no latitude. Something we haven't seen from models yet is a shift to S of the GA's.
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#387 Postby SFLcane » Wed Aug 19, 2020 7:56 am

Aric Dunn wrote:First ASCAT missed the center. but all is not lost..

there is no longer a vort or a convergence boundary to the NE. my suspicions of it being much more Circular are looking good.

http://projects.knmi.nl/scatterometer/tile_prod/products/asc_a_20200819_10_28_flag.png


I mean sure.. It shed the first vort max but NHC definitely won't classify with waning convection. Not gonna change the fact that it can't sustain convection over the LLC.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#388 Postby gatorcane » Wed Aug 19, 2020 7:58 am

As I have been saying, look at all the dry air and the upper low with westerly shear ahead. We don’t need models to tell us the environment is not particularly conducive. Euro and GFS agree:

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=24
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#389 Postby Hurricaneman » Wed Aug 19, 2020 7:59 am

toad strangler wrote:Gaining absolutely no latitude. Something we haven't seen from models yet is a shift to S of the GA's.


I wouldn’t be surprised if this went south of those islands, seems the ridge is stronger than modeled and the models are saying this is moving at 300 when it’s moving 265/270
Last edited by Hurricaneman on Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#390 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:00 am

SFLcane wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:First ASCAT missed the center. but all is not lost..

there is no longer a vort or a convergence boundary to the NE. my suspicions of it being much more Circular are looking good.

http://projects.knmi.nl/scatterometer/tile_prod/products/asc_a_20200819_10_28_flag.png


I mean sure.. It shed the first vort max but NHC definitely won't classify with waning convection. Not gonna change the fact that it can't sustain convection over the LLC.


Convection always wains during this phase. and it has been sustained convection over the center... just because you dont see -90 top does not mean there is no updrafts or convergence.

Pulsing down of convection often leads to Genesis. as it allows the circ to contract increases convergence and when convection pulses back up.. off we go..
3 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#391 Postby SFLcane » Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:00 am

gatorcane wrote:As I have been saying, look at all the dry air and the upper low with westerly shear ahead. We don’t need models to tell us the environment is not particularly conducive. Euro and GFS agree:

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=24


Ok shear is definitely not the problem.
3 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#392 Postby Nimbus » Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:01 am

toad strangler wrote:Gaining absolutely no latitude. Something we haven't seen from models yet is a shift to S of the GA's.


The switch to western vortex has the models initializing correctly.
If the spin up into a TS comes later in the NHC48 hour window then the track will be a little further south.
I think the GFS would have kept the core off the south coast of PR if it were run tomorrow (without TC genesis at the time of the run)
Last edited by Nimbus on Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#393 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:01 am

gatorcane wrote:As I have been saying, look at all the dry air and the upper low with westerly shear ahead. We don’t need models to tell us the environment is not particularly conducive. Euro and GFS agree:

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=24


go back a couple of pages this has been covered already..
3 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#394 Postby toad strangler » Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:01 am

gatorcane wrote:As I have been saying, look at all the dry air and the upper low with westerly shear ahead. We don’t need models to tell us the environment is not particularly conducive. Euro and GFS agree:

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=24


Well, the only problem with this statement is that the NHC says conditions are conducive. So ... there is that.

2. An elongated area of low pressure, located a little over 1000 miles
east of the Windward Islands continues to produce a concentrated
area of showers and thunderstorms mainly on the west side of the
disturbance. Environmental conditions are conducive for further
development, and a tropical depression is expected to form during
the next day or two while the system moves generally
west-northwestward at 15 to 20 mph across the central and western
portions of the tropical Atlantic.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...high...90 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...high...90 percent.
Last edited by toad strangler on Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:07 am, edited 4 times in total.
5 likes   

User avatar
JaxGator
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:33 pm
Location: Jacksonville Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#395 Postby JaxGator » Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:03 am

gatorcane wrote:As I have been saying, look at all the dry air and the upper low with westerly shear ahead. We don’t need models to tell us the environment is not particularly conducive. Euro and GFS agree:

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=24


A lot of the models show the TUTT retrograding westward and it’s already starting doing that in the past 12 hours in the satellite loop Aric posted. I rather not 98L develop (unless it was certain OTS). And NHC sees favorable conditions.
Last edited by JaxGator on Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
The posts or stuff said are NOT an official forecast. Please look to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.

Floyd-1999, Frances-2004, Jeanne-2004, Fay-2008, Beryl-2012, Debby-2012, Colin-2016, Hermine-2016, Julia-2016, Matthew-2016, Irma-2017, Elsa-2021, Idalia-2023, Debby-2024, Helene-2024.


Go Gators! Go Jags!

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#396 Postby SFLcane » Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:03 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
SFLcane wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:First ASCAT missed the center. but all is not lost..

there is no longer a vort or a convergence boundary to the NE. my suspicions of it being much more Circular are looking good.

http://projects.knmi.nl/scatterometer/tile_prod/products/asc_a_20200819_10_28_flag.png


I mean sure.. It shed the first vort max but NHC definitely won't classify with waning convection. Not gonna change the fact that it can't sustain convection over the LLC.


Convection always wains during this phase. and it has been sustained convection over the center... just because you dont see -90 top does not mean there is no updrafts or convergence.

Pulsing down of convection often leads to Genesis. as it allows the circ to contract increases convergence and when convection pulses back up.. off we go..


Or it never comes back and the Euro is right. We will see.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#397 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:05 am

SFLcane wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
SFLcane wrote:
I mean sure.. It shed the first vort max but NHC definitely won't classify with waning convection. Not gonna change the fact that it can't sustain convection over the LLC.


Convection always wains during this phase. and it has been sustained convection over the center... just because you dont see -90 top does not mean there is no updrafts or convergence.

Pulsing down of convection often leads to Genesis. as it allows the circ to contract increases convergence and when convection pulses back up.. off we go..


Or it never comes back and the Euro is right. We will see.


the convection is not gone.. pulse down does not mean convection vanishes like a fart in the wind.. lol
5 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#398 Postby SFLcane » Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:05 am

06z EPS certainly shows no sign.
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#399 Postby AutoPenalti » Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:06 am

DMAX did its job. Let's see what happens within the next 12 hours.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#400 Postby toad strangler » Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:07 am

SFLcane wrote:06z EPS certainly shows no sign.


Does 6z poof the wave or is there still a wave?
0 likes   


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests