ATL: TEDDY - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)

#401 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 17, 2020 8:58 am

My guess is that they go with 110kt at advisory time.
0 likes   

User avatar
AnnularCane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:18 am
Location: Wytheville, VA

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)

#402 Postby AnnularCane » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:06 am

Teddy: "Can't a guy even take a nap without everyone giving up on him?"
2 likes   

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1916
Age: 21
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Williamsburg VA for college, Bermuda otherwise

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#403 Postby Kazmit » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:06 am

Image
6 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4628
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)

#404 Postby ElectricStorm » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:07 am

RL3AO wrote:
aspen wrote:Dvorak estimates just shot up to T#6.2/120 kt now that positive eye temps are present.


The raw is still a little higher. It still is getting kept down by intensification limits.

I've never really understood the intensification restraints. Why do they have those?
1 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139779
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#405 Postby cycloneye » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:07 am

NOAAS P-3 is flying now.

NOAA WILL FLY TWO 7-HOUR P-3 RESEARCH MISSIONS INTO
HURRICANE TEDDY, THE FIRST DEPARTING TISX AT 17/1200Z,
3 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1812
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#406 Postby kevin » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:09 am

Laura and Sally were more important due to their impact on populated areas, but purely from a meteorology perspective this is probably the most anticipated recon of the season so far.
9 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)

#407 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:09 am

Weather Dude wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
aspen wrote:Dvorak estimates just shot up to T#6.2/120 kt now that positive eye temps are present.


The raw is still a little higher. It still is getting kept down by intensification limits.

I've never really understood the intensification restraints. Why do they have those?


Because observation shows that TCs usually have a limit on how fast they can intensify and it's useful to have those built into a automated algorithm. Think about how many times recon has flown into a plane and we see a low pressure but the winds "haven't caught up yet". That's the limit in action.
4 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4628
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)

#408 Postby ElectricStorm » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:11 am

RL3AO wrote:
Weather Dude wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
The raw is still a little higher. It still is getting kept down by intensification limits.

I've never really understood the intensification restraints. Why do they have those?


Because observation shows that TCs usually have a limit on how fast they can intensify and it's useful to have those built into a automated algorithm. Think about how many times recon has flown into a plane and we see a low pressure but the winds "haven't caught up yet". That's the limit in action.

That makes sense. I just remember it being weird with storms like Hagibis where they just explode and ADT stays lower
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
TheStormExpert
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8487
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:38 pm
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#409 Postby TheStormExpert » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:11 am

3 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by storm2k.org.

User avatar
Ubuntwo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1090
Age: 30
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:41 pm

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)

#410 Postby Ubuntwo » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:15 am

RL3AO wrote:
Weather Dude wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
The raw is still a little higher. It still is getting kept down by intensification limits.

I've never really understood the intensification restraints. Why do they have those?


Because observation shows that TCs usually have a limit on how fast they can intensify and it's useful to have those built into a automated algorithm. Think about how many times recon has flown into a plane and we see a low pressure but the winds "haven't caught up yet". That's the limit in action.

In this case it displays a limitation of Dvorak. Chances are it's been steadily intensifying this whole time instead of shooting up just now - I find Dvorak underestimates in the phase just before a TC presents a visible eye.
Last edited by Ubuntwo on Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
6 likes   
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC

Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)

#411 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:19 am

Weather Dude wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
Weather Dude wrote:I've never really understood the intensification restraints. Why do they have those?


Because observation shows that TCs usually have a limit on how fast they can intensify and it's useful to have those built into a automated algorithm. Think about how many times recon has flown into a plane and we see a low pressure but the winds "haven't caught up yet". That's the limit in action.

That makes sense. I just remember it being weird with storms like Hagibis where they just explode and ADT stays lower


The original Dvorak technique had a constraint of 2.5 in 24 hours which was way too low. The current version of ADT has constraints for storms with eyes of 0.5/hr, 1.7/6 hr, 2.7/12 hr, and 3.2/18 hr. That let's it deal with explosive intensification a lot better than older versions.
0 likes   

tomatkins
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 220
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:11 pm

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)

#412 Postby tomatkins » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:23 am

RL3AO wrote:
Weather Dude wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
The raw is still a little higher. It still is getting kept down by intensification limits.

I've never really understood the intensification restraints. Why do they have those?


Because observation shows that TCs usually have a limit on how fast they can intensify and it's useful to have those built into a automated algorithm. Think about how many times recon has flown into a plane and we see a low pressure but the winds "haven't caught up yet". That's the limit in action.

I hope recon flying into another plane is relatively rare for the sake of our brave hurricane hunters.
7 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)

#413 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:24 am

tomatkins wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
Weather Dude wrote:I've never really understood the intensification restraints. Why do they have those?


Because observation shows that TCs usually have a limit on how fast they can intensify and it's useful to have those built into a automated algorithm. Think about how many times recon has flown into a plane and we see a low pressure but the winds "haven't caught up yet". That's the limit in action.

I hope recon flying into another plane is relatively rare for the sake of our brave hurricane hunters.


Ha. I'll keep that typo. That's a pretty funny one.
3 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#414 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:33 am

The cloud tops of that convective burst has gone from the eastern eyewall to the southwest eyewall in 80 minutes. I wouldn't be shocked if recon finds a 125 to 130kt storm when they arrive.
1 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2914
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#415 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:35 am

Really hoping the NHC goes with at least 100 knots here... there's simply no evidence for only 95 knots at this time.
0 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#416 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:36 am

Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Really hoping the NHC goes with at least 100 knots here... there's simply no evidence for only 95 knots at this time.


If they go less than 110kt I'll be surprised.

Image
4 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4628
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#417 Postby ElectricStorm » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:41 am

This storm is likely already stronger than the NHC previous forecasts peak intensity
4 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#418 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:42 am

The 11am advisory will probably be 110kt and the 12 or 1pm special update/advisory will probably be 125 kt.
5 likes   

User avatar
BYG Jacob
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 893
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:46 pm
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#419 Postby BYG Jacob » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:45 am

RL3AO wrote:
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Really hoping the NHC goes with at least 100 knots here... there's simply no evidence for only 95 knots at this time.


If they go less than 110kt I'll be surprised.

https://i.imgur.com/TonNbFT.gif

You know a storm is going ham when convective bursts obscure the eye
1 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#420 Postby supercane4867 » Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:49 am

105kt sounds about right.

Image
3 likes   


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests