ATL: TEDDY - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)
My guess is that they go with 110kt at advisory time.
0 likes
- AnnularCane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2658
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:18 am
- Location: Wytheville, VA
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)
Teddy: "Can't a guy even take a nap without everyone giving up on him?"
2 likes
- Kazmit
- Category 5
- Posts: 1916
- Age: 21
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
- Location: Williamsburg VA for college, Bermuda otherwise
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/12ksfmK.png)
6 likes
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- ElectricStorm
- Category 5
- Posts: 4628
- Age: 23
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
- Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)
RL3AO wrote:aspen wrote:Dvorak estimates just shot up to T#6.2/120 kt now that positive eye temps are present.
The raw is still a little higher. It still is getting kept down by intensification limits.
I've never really understood the intensification restraints. Why do they have those?
1 likes
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Boomer Sooner!
Boomer Sooner!
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 139779
- Age: 67
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion
NOAAS P-3 is flying now.
NOAA WILL FLY TWO 7-HOUR P-3 RESEARCH MISSIONS INTO
HURRICANE TEDDY, THE FIRST DEPARTING TISX AT 17/1200Z,
HURRICANE TEDDY, THE FIRST DEPARTING TISX AT 17/1200Z,
3 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion
Laura and Sally were more important due to their impact on populated areas, but purely from a meteorology perspective this is probably the most anticipated recon of the season so far.
9 likes
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)
Weather Dude wrote:RL3AO wrote:aspen wrote:Dvorak estimates just shot up to T#6.2/120 kt now that positive eye temps are present.
The raw is still a little higher. It still is getting kept down by intensification limits.
I've never really understood the intensification restraints. Why do they have those?
Because observation shows that TCs usually have a limit on how fast they can intensify and it's useful to have those built into a automated algorithm. Think about how many times recon has flown into a plane and we see a low pressure but the winds "haven't caught up yet". That's the limit in action.
4 likes
- ElectricStorm
- Category 5
- Posts: 4628
- Age: 23
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
- Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)
RL3AO wrote:Weather Dude wrote:RL3AO wrote:
The raw is still a little higher. It still is getting kept down by intensification limits.
I've never really understood the intensification restraints. Why do they have those?
Because observation shows that TCs usually have a limit on how fast they can intensify and it's useful to have those built into a automated algorithm. Think about how many times recon has flown into a plane and we see a low pressure but the winds "haven't caught up yet". That's the limit in action.
That makes sense. I just remember it being weird with storms like Hagibis where they just explode and ADT stays lower
0 likes
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Boomer Sooner!
Boomer Sooner!
- TheStormExpert
- Category 5
- Posts: 8487
- Age: 30
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:38 pm
- Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion
3 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by storm2k.org.
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)
RL3AO wrote:Weather Dude wrote:RL3AO wrote:
The raw is still a little higher. It still is getting kept down by intensification limits.
I've never really understood the intensification restraints. Why do they have those?
Because observation shows that TCs usually have a limit on how fast they can intensify and it's useful to have those built into a automated algorithm. Think about how many times recon has flown into a plane and we see a low pressure but the winds "haven't caught up yet". That's the limit in action.
In this case it displays a limitation of Dvorak. Chances are it's been steadily intensifying this whole time instead of shooting up just now - I find Dvorak underestimates in the phase just before a TC presents a visible eye.
Last edited by Ubuntwo on Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
6 likes
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC
Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma
Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)
Weather Dude wrote:RL3AO wrote:Weather Dude wrote:I've never really understood the intensification restraints. Why do they have those?
Because observation shows that TCs usually have a limit on how fast they can intensify and it's useful to have those built into a automated algorithm. Think about how many times recon has flown into a plane and we see a low pressure but the winds "haven't caught up yet". That's the limit in action.
That makes sense. I just remember it being weird with storms like Hagibis where they just explode and ADT stays lower
The original Dvorak technique had a constraint of 2.5 in 24 hours which was way too low. The current version of ADT has constraints for storms with eyes of 0.5/hr, 1.7/6 hr, 2.7/12 hr, and 3.2/18 hr. That let's it deal with explosive intensification a lot better than older versions.
0 likes
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)
RL3AO wrote:Weather Dude wrote:RL3AO wrote:
The raw is still a little higher. It still is getting kept down by intensification limits.
I've never really understood the intensification restraints. Why do they have those?
Because observation shows that TCs usually have a limit on how fast they can intensify and it's useful to have those built into a automated algorithm. Think about how many times recon has flown into a plane and we see a low pressure but the winds "haven't caught up yet". That's the limit in action.
I hope recon flying into another plane is relatively rare for the sake of our brave hurricane hunters.
7 likes
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion (Recon leaves at 10:30 AM EDT)
tomatkins wrote:RL3AO wrote:Weather Dude wrote:I've never really understood the intensification restraints. Why do they have those?
Because observation shows that TCs usually have a limit on how fast they can intensify and it's useful to have those built into a automated algorithm. Think about how many times recon has flown into a plane and we see a low pressure but the winds "haven't caught up yet". That's the limit in action.
I hope recon flying into another plane is relatively rare for the sake of our brave hurricane hunters.
Ha. I'll keep that typo. That's a pretty funny one.
3 likes
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion
The cloud tops of that convective burst has gone from the eastern eyewall to the southwest eyewall in 80 minutes. I wouldn't be shocked if recon finds a 125 to 130kt storm when they arrive.
1 likes
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5
- Posts: 2914
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion
Really hoping the NHC goes with at least 100 knots here... there's simply no evidence for only 95 knots at this time.
0 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Really hoping the NHC goes with at least 100 knots here... there's simply no evidence for only 95 knots at this time.
If they go less than 110kt I'll be surprised.
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/TonNbFT.gif)
4 likes
- ElectricStorm
- Category 5
- Posts: 4628
- Age: 23
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
- Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion
This storm is likely already stronger than the NHC previous forecasts peak intensity
4 likes
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Boomer Sooner!
Boomer Sooner!
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion
The 11am advisory will probably be 110kt and the 12 or 1pm special update/advisory will probably be 125 kt.
5 likes
Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion
RL3AO wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Really hoping the NHC goes with at least 100 knots here... there's simply no evidence for only 95 knots at this time.
If they go less than 110kt I'll be surprised.
https://i.imgur.com/TonNbFT.gif
You know a storm is going ham when convective bursts obscure the eye
1 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests