Ubuntwo wrote:A ship SE of the storm's center just reported 48kt sustained winds.
You are correct, and an area when the recon hasn't sampled yet.
SHIP S 1200 26.90 -92.20 43 98 170 48.0 - 13.1 4.0 - - 29.68
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Ubuntwo wrote:A ship SE of the storm's center just reported 48kt sustained winds.
GCANE wrote:999.5 from 1001.8 mb in 1.5 hrs
wx98 wrote:Good reminder of the time of year. I’ve been very skeptical from the start of those calling for RI to Cat 2, 3, 4. It appears slightly stronger this morning, yet slightly more disorganized than last night. A minimal hurricane will be difficult at this rate, unless it can get it’s act together this afternoon.
Highteeld wrote:6z euro has around a 994 mb landfall, but the model is about 4 to 5 mb too high for central pressure for the current hour.
texsn95 wrote:Is she on a more NW track now?
Cpv17 wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:Hanna needs to get some convection going on it’s NW side in order to RI or intensify into a hurricane. Hanna kind of reminds me of Hurricane Alex in 2010 where the pressure was dropping yet the winds weren’t increasing due to its large and broad size. Never was able to maintain major status before heading into NE Mexico south of the Texas border.
This is why places like Brownsville will probably get more rain than places like Victoria and points north of there. Odd. Very little convection north of the center. I guess the dry air is doing that.
Cpv17 wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:Hanna needs to get some convection going on it’s NW side in order to RI or intensify into a hurricane. Hanna kind of reminds me of Hurricane Alex in 2010 where the pressure was dropping yet the winds weren’t increasing due to its large and broad size. Never was able to maintain major status before heading into NE Mexico south of the Texas border.
This is why places like Brownsville will probably get more rain than places like Victoria and points north of there. Odd. Very little convection north of the center. I guess the dry air is doing that.
Texashawk wrote:texsn95 wrote:Is she on a more NW track now?
Looking at long range radar, it seems that way, maybe moving 310 erratically right now?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests