ATL: ISAIAS - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139086
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: ISAIAS - Models

#2481 Postby cycloneye » Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:40 am

0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139086
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: ISAIAS - Models

#2482 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 04, 2020 12:56 pm

Question for the model huggers. Which model or models performed the best with Isaias from the start as a Tropical Wave east of the Lesser Antilles?
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

fox13weather
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:49 pm

Re: ATL: ISAIAS - Models

#2483 Postby fox13weather » Tue Aug 04, 2020 1:03 pm

ronjon wrote:
fox13weather wrote:
MoliNuno wrote:With so many models showing Isaias moving inland within 36 hours, why is the NHC consistently hugging the right side of guidance?


So many? The ECMWF has actually trended to the east the past few runs ...consensus is up the coast and I have lost track of the number of storm that were supposed to make landfall on the east coast of Florida only to stay 50 miles offshore...


No the ECM actually shifted inland quite a bit in its 12z run from its offshore 00z previous run. So much so that Rick Knabb (former director of NHC) now on TWC consistently showed that run to warn tonight the center might likely come inland in Florida. The 18z Euro shifted slightly east from the 12z run, but it still tracks inland. Meanwhile, the major models on the right side of the guidance at 12z such as the GFS, GFS para, and HWRF have all shifted West on their 18z runs. Add in the UKMET, CMC, ICON, and NAVGEM as other models that now track inland in Florida and I think that's shaping up to be a pretty strong consensus. Could Iasias still stay offshore? Sure but Weight of evidence suggests less likely at this point.


..as i was saying ....I have lost track of the number of storm that were supposed to make landfall on the east coast of Florida only to stay 50 miles offshore...
4 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8606
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: ISAIAS - Models

#2484 Postby Steve » Tue Aug 04, 2020 3:14 pm

cycloneye wrote:Question for the model huggers. Which model or models performed the best with Isaias from the start as a Tropical Wave east of the Lesser Antilles?


It's hard to say. Some of them were almost dead on many many days out. But most of them had issues along the way. I thought the Canadian was too far west for several runs late when it should have known better (near interaction with Florida). UKMET did in some of its runs as well. Also the EC. NAM kept it offshore of Florida and HRRR mostly did though it timed a lot of the pulses pretty well (expected when a short term model runs every hour).

Here's an interesting run for you though. I went back 6 days (ICON 18z last Wednesday).
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 2918&fh=48

Compare that to the GFS which wasn't bad but was too far East
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 918&fh=144

Here's the Canadian from 6 hours later (Thursday 00Z). Like the GFS it was in the ballpark but too far west instead of being too far East like the GFS
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 000&fh=222

EC was similar to the CMC (this is last Thursday 00z)
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 000&fh=108

Just something to reference next time ICON gets arbitrarily trashed. I'm still feeling it out, but it's had some success this year.

Next Point of Comparison will be 00Z Saturday. For those of you who endlessly remind us that but it's the NAM or routinely bash it saying it's not to be used for the tropics, the rest of us understand that. We also understand this. It worked very well for those upcoming 60 hours. That's not a lot of time (2 1/2 days), but it shows some value there.

NAM 3k 00Z Saturday
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0100&fh=84
2 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4162
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: ISAIAS - Models

#2485 Postby toad strangler » Tue Aug 04, 2020 3:17 pm

fox13weather wrote:
ronjon wrote:
fox13weather wrote:
..as i was saying ....I have lost track of the number of storm that were supposed to make landfall on the east coast of Florida only to stay 50 miles offshore...


It's been nearly 15 years now since a Hurricane FL East Coast landfall.
0 likes   

SconnieCane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Re: ATL: ISAIAS - Models

#2486 Postby SconnieCane » Tue Aug 04, 2020 5:13 pm

toad strangler wrote:
fox13weather wrote:
ronjon wrote:


It's been nearly 15 years now since a Hurricane FL East Coast landfall.


...and the one that didn't stay offshore and go north missed south/west (Irma). Force field in effect.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139086
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: ISAIAS - Models

#2487 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 04, 2020 5:14 pm

Steve wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Question for the model huggers. Which model or models performed the best with Isaias from the start as a Tropical Wave east of the Lesser Antilles?


It's hard to say. Some of them were almost dead on many many days out. But most of them had issues along the way. I thought the Canadian was too far west for several runs late when it should have known better (near interaction with Florida). UKMET did in some of its runs as well. Also the EC. NAM kept it offshore of Florida and HRRR mostly did though it timed a lot of the pulses pretty well (expected when a short term model runs every hour).

Here's an interesting run for you though. I went back 6 days (ICON 18z last Wednesday).
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 2918&fh=48

Compare that to the GFS which wasn't bad but was too far East
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 918&fh=144

Here's the Canadian from 6 hours later (Thursday 00Z). Like the GFS it was in the ballpark but too far west instead of being too far East like the GFS
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 000&fh=222

EC was similar to the CMC (this is last Thursday 00z)
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 000&fh=108

Just something to reference next time ICON gets arbitrarily trashed. I'm still feeling it out, but it's had some success this year.

Next Point of Comparison will be 00Z Saturday. For those of you who endlessly remind us that but it's the NAM or routinely bash it saying it's not to be used for the tropics, the rest of us understand that. We also understand this. It worked very well for those upcoming 60 hours. That's not a lot of time (2 1/2 days), but it shows some value there.

NAM 3k 00Z Saturday
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0100&fh=84


Thank you for that.
1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8606
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: ISAIAS - Models

#2488 Postby Steve » Tue Aug 04, 2020 5:51 pm

No problem. That's just the stuff I saw. I always forget the link where they evaluate the models, but I'm sure someone will have it.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9863
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: ISAIAS - Models

#2489 Postby Blown Away » Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:24 pm

Steve wrote:No problem. That's just the stuff I saw. I always forget the link where they evaluate the models, but I'm sure someone will have it.


Steve, you did a good job posting models and providing your opinions on how Isaias would impact the NE.
1 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05...
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8606
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: ISAIAS - Models

#2490 Postby Steve » Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:33 pm

Blown Away wrote:
Steve wrote:No problem. That's just the stuff I saw. I always forget the link where they evaluate the models, but I'm sure someone will have it.


Steve, you did a good job posting models and providing your opinions on how Isaias would impact the NE.


Thanks Blown. I just typed what I thought I saw. I started paying much closer attention late last week when most of the talk was on Florida. But it seemed likely there would be a Part 2/3 because the way out for the system was to the north through SC/NC and essentially up the entire east coast but fairly close to the coast. Where we got lucky, and it was a curiosity to me early last weekend, was why wasn't a storm coming up through that part of the ocean likely to strengthen into a monster storm. Most of the models I looked at showed maybe 977 or 978 as the absolute lowest. So the models were telegraphing that we might have caught a break. I assume the combination of the date, super dry air early on to the west, Phase 4 MJO and the SW shear was what held it back. But on the other hand, there was a decent chance a strong tropical storm or possibly lower end hurricane was going to hit and no doubt affect 10's of millions of people and plenty of us here. So I thought it was worth putting out whatever effort I could for anyone who had time to see what I was looking at.
1 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4162
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: ISAIAS - Models

#2491 Postby toad strangler » Wed Aug 05, 2020 7:04 pm

Steve wrote:
Blown Away wrote:
Steve wrote:No problem. That's just the stuff I saw. I always forget the link where they evaluate the models, but I'm sure someone will have it.


Steve, you did a good job posting models and providing your opinions on how Isaias would impact the NE.


Thanks Blown. I just typed what I thought I saw. I started paying much closer attention late last week when most of the talk was on Florida. But it seemed likely there would be a Part 2/3 because the way out for the system was to the north through SC/NC and essentially up the entire east coast but fairly close to the coast. Where we got lucky, and it was a curiosity to me early last weekend, was why wasn't a storm coming up through that part of the ocean likely to strengthen into a monster storm. Most of the models I looked at showed maybe 977 or 978 as the absolute lowest. So the models were telegraphing that we might have caught a break. I assume the combination of the date, super dry air early on to the west, Phase 4 MJO and the SW shear was what held it back. But on the other hand, there was a decent chance a strong tropical storm or possibly lower end hurricane was going to hit and no doubt affect 10's of millions of people and plenty of us here. So I thought it was worth putting out whatever effort I could for anyone who had time to see what I was looking at.


Vigorous westerly shear was the main culprit and it weaponized the dry air by reaming it right into Isaias kitchen. So shear is numero uno and why peninsular FL saw next to nothing.
3 likes   


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests