ATL: SAM - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8812
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#101 Postby aspen » Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:06 pm

It’ll really throw the models for a loop if 98L consolidates way quicker than forecast and further north than expected. The model consensus doesn’t show a TS until Friday, and the disturbance takes a SW dip during the next 24-36 hours before coming back north.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#102 Postby Hammy » Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:09 pm



How does the GFS continuously handle the ridging this poorly?
1 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4051
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#103 Postby Category5Kaiju » Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:18 pm

aspen wrote:It’ll really throw the models for a loop if 98L consolidates way quicker than forecast and further north than expected. The model consensus doesn’t show a TS until Friday, and the disturbance takes a SW dip during the next 24-36 hours before coming back north.


The way I imagine it is like a Douglas 2020-like path except in the Atlantic MDR.
2 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#104 Postby grapealcoholic » Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:19 pm

aspen wrote:It’ll really throw the models for a loop if 98L consolidates way quicker than forecast and further north than expected. The model consensus doesn’t show a TS until Friday, and the disturbance takes a SW dip during the next 24-36 hours before coming back north.

A stronger storm would go further south and west

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143863
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#105 Postby cycloneye » Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:44 pm

00z Best Track:

AL, 98, 2021092200, , BEST, 0, 96N, 296W, 25, 1010, DB
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#106 Postby Teban54 » Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:52 pm

Looks like 98L is getting its act together fairly quickly. So much for the struggle calls or even Peter 2.0 calls earlier when it was devoid of convection.
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143863
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#107 Postby cycloneye » Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:52 pm

0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
ouragans
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 481
Age: 53
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:09 pm
Location: Abymes, Guadeloupe F.W.I
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#108 Postby ouragans » Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:53 pm

Invest 98L
As of 00:00 UTC Sep 22, 2021:

Location: 9.6°N 29.6°W
Maximum Winds: 25 kt Gusts: N/A
Minimum Central Pressure: 1010 mb
Environmental Pressure: N/A
Radius of Circulation: N/A
Radius of Maximum wind: 80 nm
0 likes   
Personal forecast disclaimer
This post is a personal point of view, not an information. Please refer to official statements for life-threatening decisions.

David '79, Frederic '79, Hugo '89, Iris, Luis & Marilyn '95, Georges '98, Lenny '99, Dean '07, Irma '17, Maria '17, Fiona '22, Philippe '23, Tammy '23
16°13'33.3,"6N -61°36'39.5"W

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10162
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#109 Postby SFLcane » Tue Sep 21, 2021 8:09 pm

This is a go for development. Environment ahead looks quite favorable unlike previous Mdr waves
3 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7177
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#110 Postby jlauderdal » Tue Sep 21, 2021 8:12 pm

Hammy wrote:


How does the GFS continuously handle the ridging this poorly?
Its the same gfs that drives the system through the ridge down the road
1 likes   

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4051
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#111 Postby Category5Kaiju » Tue Sep 21, 2021 8:15 pm

Image

Assuming everything goes in favor for future Sam, a very strong Cat 4 or even a Cat 5 cannot be ruled out. Just saying... :eek:
3 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

User avatar
Stormybajan
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 447
Joined: Thu May 20, 2021 3:21 pm
Location: Windward Islands

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#112 Postby Stormybajan » Tue Sep 21, 2021 8:17 pm


I saw this and was like wow...thankfully someone else noticed it also, pretty cool feature like an umbilical cord :lol: . 98L seems to want to get the party started a bit earlier than expected and a touch north of most models
0 likes   
Sad West Indies and Manchester United fan ⚽️

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8903
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#113 Postby Sciencerocks » Tue Sep 21, 2021 9:06 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
WiscoWx02
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 391
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2021 8:09 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#114 Postby WiscoWx02 » Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:09 pm

HWRF 00Z drops it. Could be a dud run, or maybe the beginning of the normal model drop off we have seen so much of lately?
0 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#115 Postby Teban54 » Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:16 pm

WiscoWx02 wrote:HWRF 00Z drops it. Could be a dud run, or maybe the beginning of the normal model drop off we have seen so much of lately?

Given the current organization trends, that seems extremely unlikely.

What you're seeing is the 18z HWRF, not 00z. As mentioned in the models thread, the 18z HWRF run was erroneous in that it focused on another random area of low pressure.
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5017
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#116 Postby ElectricStorm » Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:18 pm

Teban54 wrote:
WiscoWx02 wrote:HWRF 00Z drops it. Could be a dud run, or maybe the beginning of the normal model drop off we have seen so much of lately?

Given the current organization trends, that seems extremely unlikely.

Yeah the 18z run was a dud, 0z hasn't ran yet. 98L is actually behaving similar to the 12z HWRF which showed a big blowup of convection today, which has happened. That run went on to have a Cat 4 approaching the islands.
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#117 Postby grapealcoholic » Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:20 pm

It's too bad both ASCATs missed
0 likes   

User avatar
WiscoWx02
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 391
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2021 8:09 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#118 Postby WiscoWx02 » Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:21 pm

Weather Dude wrote:
Teban54 wrote:
WiscoWx02 wrote:HWRF 00Z drops it. Could be a dud run, or maybe the beginning of the normal model drop off we have seen so much of lately?

Given the current organization trends, that seems extremely unlikely.

Yeah the 18z run was a dud, 0z hasn't ran yet. 98L is actually behaving similar to the 12z HWRF which showed a big blowup of convection today, which has happened. That run went on to have a Cat 4 approaching the islands.


Ohhhhhh. Wasn't aware of that yet oops. Thanks for that update guys!
0 likes   

IcyTundra
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1205
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#119 Postby IcyTundra » Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:23 pm

WiscoWx02 wrote:HWRF 00Z drops it. Could be a dud run, or maybe the beginning of the normal model drop off we have seen so much of lately?


If you look at the HWRF-Parent (same as HWRF expect it is a wider view) it still develops 98L. HWRF-Parent is a lower resolution than the HWRF so it would likely be stronger than what it is showing. HWRF sometimes has an issue with systems that haven't developed yet where it sometimes just loses the system and latches onto a seperate low pressure system that is not related to what it is supposed to be tracking. https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 92118&fh=3
2 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5017
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#120 Postby ElectricStorm » Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:23 pm

WiscoWx02 wrote:
Weather Dude wrote:
Teban54 wrote:Given the current organization trends, that seems extremely unlikely.

Yeah the 18z run was a dud, 0z hasn't ran yet. 98L is actually behaving similar to the 12z HWRF which showed a big blowup of convection today, which has happened. That run went on to have a Cat 4 approaching the islands.


Ohhhhhh. Wasn't aware of that yet oops. Thanks for that update guys!

Yeah sometimes HWRF/HMON randomly lose a storm and then show nothing, which happened at 18z. They should be better once an actual center forms within the next few days.
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests